User talk:Mr. PIM
Hello from Nick
Hello, Mr. PIM, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- Introduction
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome! ~ thesublime514 • talk • sign 21:02, April 8, 2007 (UTC)
inline PNG images in text for math symbols.[edit]
most of the edits you are making to the Group delay and phase delay are contrary to math style manual which recommends to avoid inline formulas as PNG images. before going farther, could you please review that? this is a sorta controversial thing since many other editors like to insert PNG inline with the text. PNG images inline are a little messy, especially if there are lots of them, which is why they want us to avoid doing that. r b-j 16:57, 8 May 2007 (UTC)
- That's the only way I know to make the typesetting in the equations the same as the typesetting in the text, so that the symbols look the same. What is the problem with PNG images within the text? --Mr. PIM 20:52, 9 May 2007 (UTC)
This edit was misguided. You need to read more carefully. The thing you got rid of clearly stated that the partial sums do exhibit the overshoot. It said THEIR POINTWISE LIMIT does not. And indeed it does not. Michael Hardy (talk) 01:01, 28 July 2008 (UTC)
Side lobe[edit]
Hi,
I reverted your elimination of link to German to de:Antennendiagramm#Nebenkeulen in the article Side lobe for two reasons:
- Side lobe IS an article about radiation pattern of an antenna as is the German one ;
- The link is for the specific section Nebenkeulen of that article that talk about side lobes.
Pierre cb (d) 17 septembre 2008 à 20:16 (CEST)
- Perhaps you can point to the policies on interwiki links, but I would think that articles should link to articles. If the German wikipedia were to write a full article on sidelobes, it would be appropriate for side lobe article to link to it. Note that the radiation pattern article already links to de:Antennendiagramm so in my POV it is inappropriate to have two distinct articles in the English Wikipedia link to the same article in the German Wikipedia. Mr. PIM (talk) 22:38, 21 September 2008 (UTC)
- Excuse me but it is not to me or you to set the rules. It is to the whole wikipedia community and I submitted this question to Wikipedia:Help_desk#Side_lobes. I hope that you will follow the discussion that it will bring and act according to the advices they will put there. I do not know what they will be but I intend to follow the rules myself. I just found this Wikipedia:Interlanguage_links#Inline_interlanguage_links though. Pierre cb (talk) 02:21, 22 September 2008 (UTC)
Newton[edit]
Fair enough. :) EVula // talk // ☯ // 21:35, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:38, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
File:Types of current by Zureks.jpg listed for discussion[edit]
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Types of current by Zureks.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination.
ATTENTION: This is an automated, bot-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 23:50, 19 December 2016 (UTC)
Nomination of Cosmic catastrophe for deletion[edit]
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cosmic catastrophe until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.