User talk:Mr Savva
Welcome to Wikipedia!!![edit]
|
Chris Troutman (talk) 14:01, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
Welcome![edit]
Hello, Mr Savva, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.
If you are interested in Russia-related topics, you may want to check out the WikiProject Russia and its task forces, the Russia Portal and the project discussion page. You might even want to add these pages to your watchlist.
Again, welcome! Chris Troutman (talk) 14:02, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
Reference errors on 10 January[edit]
Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:
- On the Federal Assembly (Russia) page, your edit caused a URL error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:23, 11 January 2017 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for April 8[edit]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Government of Russia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Olga Vasilyeva. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:59, 8 April 2017 (UTC)
June 2017[edit]
Hello, I'm MJ500. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Alexander Tkachov (politician), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. MJ500 Fancy a coffee? 06:01, 25 June 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message[edit]
Hello, Mr Savva. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Third Force in 2018 Presidential Elections[edit]
Hi,
As you're one of the biggest contributors to Russian presidential election, 2018 I thought I should consult you about this. Following the unsuccessful primaries of Third Force, all the candidates (except one) said that they plan to participate in the election -
"В день пресс-конференции одно из известных агентств распространило сообщение, будто бы Кремль запретил кандидатам «Третьей силы» идти на выборы, регистрироваться кандидатами в президенты. Но все присутствовавшие в пресс-центре «Комсомолки» опровергли эту информацию, и даже почти единогласно подняли руки в ответ на вопрос, кто из них решил дальше вести свою предвыборную кампанию. Не сделала этого лишь Ольга Анищенко, пояснив, что она еще подумает. Слишком серьезное дело, для которого нужны большие финансовые ресурсы. А глава «Союза горожан» Вячеслав Смирнов, ведший пресс-конференцию, посетовал, что «у нас нет административного барьера, зато есть финансовый». И потому перед каждым, кто решит идти на выборы, стоит главная задача - сбор денег и поиск спонсоров." Source: http://www.eg.ru/politics/427877/
Do you think we should add them to the Contested Access section? Or wait a bit until the situation becomes clearer?
I suppose at least now we can remove the part about the Third Force primaries.
YantarCoast (talk) 14:15, 12 December 2017 (UTC)
I think your idea is a good one, and it makes more sense than just adding them all as contested access candidates. Thanks! YantarCoast (talk) 17:57, 12 December 2017 (UTC)
- You have twice reverted in the article on Ksenia Sobchak. Please could you use the article talk page to explain your viewpoint.-- Toddy1 (talk) 09:31, 29 December 2017 (UTC)
Ways to improve Opinion polling for the Russian presidential election, 2000[edit]
Hi, I'm Babymissfortune. Mr Savva, thanks for creating Opinion polling for the Russian presidential election, 2000!
I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Can you please provide your references? Thanks.
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.
Happy New Year!!! Babymissfortune 15:55, 5 January 2018 (UTC)
Number of UR seats in the State Duma[edit]
Hi,
Recently you reverted my edit on United Russia, by changing the number of seats from 339 to 338.
But on State Duma and 7th State Duma you wrote that United Russia has 339 seats.
What is the reason for this difference?
YantarCoast (talk) 12:17, 22 January 2018 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for February 20[edit]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Vladimir Zhirinovsky presidential campaign, 2018, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Shadow government (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:19, 20 February 2018 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for May 12[edit]
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Fourth inauguration of Vladimir Putin, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Alexander Dyukov (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 11:26, 12 May 2018 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for July 15[edit]
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Minister of Foreign Affairs (Russia), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mikhail Yakovlev (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:18, 15 July 2018 (UTC)
A barnstar for you![edit]
|
The Rosetta Barnstar |
| Thanks for translating the Russian articles. I hope you'll keep going. Störm (talk) 10:44, 19 August 2018 (UTC) |
Disambiguation link notification for September 17[edit]
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Primorsky Krai gubernatorial election, 2018, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Andrey Tarasenko (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:37, 17 September 2018 (UTC)
Российский сенатор и учёный ещё не имеет статью здесь[edit]
Здравствуйте! Как я обнаружил, Вы неравнодушны к статьям на политические русские темы, зная язык. По этой причине у меня есть просьба: используя интервики, создать в английской Википедии статью про этого сенатора из ЛДПР (Совет Федерации ФС РФ). Да хоть такую же коротенькую. P.S. Сам я не умею создавать статьи. Жду Ваш ответ. Спасибо, надеюсь! - 95.27.104.37 (talk) 16:18, 29 October 2018 (UTC).
Politics of Russia template removals[edit]
Hi Mr Savva, could you please explain why you have removed the Template:Politics of Russia from numerous articles? Also it would be helpful to others if you could use edit summaries more often, to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. Thanks... --IamNotU (talk) 18:35, 31 October 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message[edit]
Hello, Mr Savva. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Party of Growth/meta/color listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Party of Growth/meta/color. Since you had some involvement with the Party of Growth/meta/color redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Stefan2 (talk) 21:57, 14 December 2018 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for January 31[edit]
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of members of the Federation Council (Russia), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Vladimir Kozhin (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:35, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
Ways to improve Cherez vse Vremena[edit]
Hello, Mr Savva,
Thanks for creating Cherez vse Vremena! I edit here too, under the username Hughesdarren and it's nice to meet you :-)
I wanted to let you know that I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-
Nice work on the article but there only appears to be one independent reference which may or may not be reliable. Using the bands own website and youtube clips definitely are not useful as references.
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Hughesdarren}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.
Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
Hughesdarren (talk) 08:41, 2 March 2019 (UTC)
Ways to improve Proklyatiye morey[edit]
Hello, Mr Savva,
Thanks for creating Proklyatiye morey! I edit here too, under the username Hughesdarren and it's nice to meet you :-)
I wanted to let you know that I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:-
Nice start to this article too, but again needs more independent reliable references (the bands website doesn'y apply here)
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Hughesdarren}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.
Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
Hughesdarren (talk) 08:46, 2 March 2019 (UTC)
References and punctuation[edit]
Hello Mr Savva. Just an FYI – you should put references after punctuation (like full stops, commas etc), not before. Cheers, Number 57 13:10, 22 March 2019 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for July 12[edit]
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Dmitry Ovsyannikov, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Governor of Sevastopol (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:20, 12 July 2019 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message[edit]
| Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Hello Mr Savva. When this article was controversially moved, you should have moved it back to its original title. Creating the same article at the old title messes up the page history as we effectively have two articles on the same topic. I have moved the article back to the old title, deleting the article you started there. Any further attempt to move the article should be done via the WP:RM process. Cheers, Number 57 21:20, 21 January 2020 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Category:2020 elections in Russia[edit]
A tag has been placed on Category:2020 elections in Russia requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 02:23, 22 January 2020 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for March 3[edit]
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Political parties in Russia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Left (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:27, 3 March 2020 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for March 28[edit]
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Vladimir Putin, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page State Council (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:57, 28 March 2020 (UTC)
"Minister of of Internal Affairs (Russia)" listed at Redirects for discussion[edit]
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Minister of of Internal Affairs (Russia). Since you had some involvement with the Minister of of Internal Affairs (Russia) redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Regards, SONIC678 04:32, 3 April 2020 (UTC)
Edit summaries[edit]
Hi. Please use edit summaries to explain your changes, especially when reverting. Thanks. El_C 12:48, 4 April 2020 (UTC)
April 2020[edit]
Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.
When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:
Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)
Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.
Edit summary content is visible in:
Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → 
Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary.
Thanks! Abbyjjjj96 (talk) 14:58, 1 May 2020 (UTC)
The article 2020 Presidential Address to the Federal Assembly has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Separately this topic is not notable enough, I propose to redirect to general article Presidential Address to the Federal Assembly. There is already a separate article on 2020 amendments to the Constitution of Russia
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Zotur (talk) 17:17, 1 June 2020 (UTC)
State Duma parties' colors[edit]
Ehi, Savva, thanks for updating the State Duma MPs diagram. However new colors differ from the previous image and the parties' list below the diagram in the info box. Could you correct those? The correct color codes are #D70000 for Communist Party, #FFC003 for A Just Russia, #411880 for Civic Platform, #EA484A for Rodina, #3F68B1 for LDPR and #0C2C84 for United Russia. Thanks again. Lone Internaut (talk) 18:35, 27 June 2020 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for July 23[edit]
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2024 Russian presidential election, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Igor Lebedev.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:25, 23 July 2020 (UTC)
Template:Green parties[edit]
Just a reminder to use an edit summary! Thanks! ;-) Me-123567-Me (talk) 20:20, 18 September 2020 (UTC)
Ways to improve List of Energy Ministers of Russia[edit]
Hello, Mr Savva,
Thank you for creating List of Energy Ministers of Russia.
I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:
Thank you for creating the article.
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Joseywales1961}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.
Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
JW 1961 Talk 19:02, 8 November 2020 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message[edit]
| Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Why won't you engage in a debate[edit]
@Mr Savva: What's the matter, scared of engaging in a rational, fair debate? LauraWilliamson (talk) 19:05, 3 February 2021 (UTC)
Notice of Dispute resolution noticeboard discussion[edit]
This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution.
Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you!
LauraWilliamson (talk) 18:13, 7 February 2021 (UTC)
Request to participate on talk page from a Dispute Resolution Volunteer[edit]
Would you please engage with LauraWilliamson on the talk page of Talk:2024_Russian_presidential_election#Mr_Savva and help her find a solution rather than just reverting and trying to communicate with edit notes? That would be a more collaborative and effective way to solve this issue. Thank you. Nightenbelle (talk) 17:34, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
- @Nightenbelle: I appreciate this effort and thank you, but if you look up at all other posts on this users talk page, they don't ever reply acknowledge posts here either. LauraWilliamson (talk) 17:38, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
- I am making a good faith effort to WP:AGF and get them involved. Before jumping to more extreme measures- do everything diplomatic that you can. If this doesn't work- fine. You will have done a WP:30 or WP:RFC and a consensus will exist without their contributions or participation. But its worth at least trying. Nightenbelle (talk) 17:42, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
- Well yes I agree, but the WP:30 I just did was deleted because there wasn't enough discussion yet, so I'm going round in circles. Obviously I know there hasn't been a long debate, but thats because they're not replying. LauraWilliamson (talk) 17:46, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
- I am making a good faith effort to WP:AGF and get them involved. Before jumping to more extreme measures- do everything diplomatic that you can. If this doesn't work- fine. You will have done a WP:30 or WP:RFC and a consensus will exist without their contributions or participation. But its worth at least trying. Nightenbelle (talk) 17:42, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
I concur with Nightenbelle. It's time, Mr Savva, that you either stop editing that page or start discussing on the article talk page. Continuing to revert without talk page discussion is regarded by many admins as being disruptive. You're skating on thin ice by continuing to do so and eyes are on this dispute. If you don't care to discuss, drop the stick and walk away. This encyclopedia is based on discussion and consensus, not reversion. You have a clean block log at this point, which is a real asset; keep it that way. — TransporterMan (TALK) 17:51, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
- @TransporterMan: Thank you so much for that, I finally feel like someone has understood the situation perfectly. LauraWilliamson (talk) 17:56, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
- Thank you, but let me say a word on Mr Savva's behalf. I've been doing dispute resolution work here for a long time. So like the insurance commercial on TV, I know a thing or two because I've seen a thing or two. There are a lot of editors who come here and do a tremendous amount of good work just editing without ever becoming involved in a discussion. Most often that's because their edits are Wikignomish, uncontroversial, or they work in areas that get so little attention that no one notices. Because their edits are almost never contested, they have never really been forced to learn how to deal with disagreement and, quite often, know little or nothing about Wikipedia policy or guidelines. When they finally run into a controversy, often after years of editing, they often don't have the experience needed to deal with it. And they have to make a decision, as I've called upon Mr Savva to do, to just walk away from this one particular thing and go back to doing the many other good things that they do or to finally become involved in the fray. Looking at Mr Savva's contributions, he's clearly one of those folks. So, though he needs to make a decision, I very much respect all the good that he's done in the past. Regards, TransporterMan (TALK) 18:15, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
- Yes sounds fair. What I would say is that Mr Savva appears to be of Russian origin, as I can see they have made a lot of good contributions on Russian political articles. With Alexei Navalny it is a bit difficult because most Russian media is quite anti-Navalny (the major news organisations like Russia Today are owned by the Russian government), so his importance is downplayed. Elsewhere, however, he is openly acknowledged as the most prominent Russian opposition leader. LauraWilliamson (talk) 18:32, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
- Thank you, but let me say a word on Mr Savva's behalf. I've been doing dispute resolution work here for a long time. So like the insurance commercial on TV, I know a thing or two because I've seen a thing or two. There are a lot of editors who come here and do a tremendous amount of good work just editing without ever becoming involved in a discussion. Most often that's because their edits are Wikignomish, uncontroversial, or they work in areas that get so little attention that no one notices. Because their edits are almost never contested, they have never really been forced to learn how to deal with disagreement and, quite often, know little or nothing about Wikipedia policy or guidelines. When they finally run into a controversy, often after years of editing, they often don't have the experience needed to deal with it. And they have to make a decision, as I've called upon Mr Savva to do, to just walk away from this one particular thing and go back to doing the many other good things that they do or to finally become involved in the fray. Looking at Mr Savva's contributions, he's clearly one of those folks. So, though he needs to make a decision, I very much respect all the good that he's done in the past. Regards, TransporterMan (TALK) 18:15, 8 February 2021 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for September 11[edit]
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ministry of Emergency Situations (Russia), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page FSB.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 11 September 2021 (UTC)
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message[edit]
| Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Nomination for deletion of Template:Russian politics/party colours[edit]
Template:Russian politics/party colours has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 13:03, 4 January 2022 (UTC)
A barnstar for you![edit]
|
The Original Barnstar | |
| Thanks for your contributions on Russian politics articles. Mellk (talk) 16:01, 25 July 2022 (UTC) |
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:32, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Nomination for deletion of Template:Mironov sidebar[edit]
Template:Mironov sidebar has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 00:20, 10 January 2023 (UTC)
Edit summaries and onus[edit]
Hi there, please use edit summaries, especially when reverting. El_C reminded you of that before, see above. Also, please repect WP:ONUS instead of edit warring. Rsk6400 (talk) 06:38, 24 September 2023 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:48, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
I have sent you a note about a page you started[edit]
Hello, Mr Savva. Thank you for your work on Nikolay Kharitonov 2024 presidential campaign. SunDawn, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
Hello my friend! Good day to you. Thanks for creating the article, I have marked it as reviewed. Have a blessed day!
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|SunDawn}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
✠ SunDawn ✠ (contact) 10:18, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
Ways to improve Candidates in the 2024 Russian presidential election[edit]
Hello, Mr Savva,
Thank you for creating Candidates in the 2024 Russian presidential election.
I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:
Hi there, Mr Savva. A number of named references in the article were invoked but never defined. This means they are effectively blank, and this will need to be corrected.
This usually arises from a copy-paste move of content. It appaears material was copied from 2024 Russian presidential election. Copying within Wikipedia is acceptable but it must be attributed.
This type of edit does get picked up by Copy Patrol and a good edit summary helps to make sure we don't accidentally revert it. However, for future use, would you note the best practices wording as outlined at Wikipedia:Copying_within_Wikipedia? In particular, linking to the source article and adding the phrase "see that page's history for attribution" helps ensure that proper attribution is preserved.
While best practices are that attribution should be added to the edit summary at the time the edit is made, the linked article on best practices describes the appropriate steps to add attribution after the fact. I hope you will do so.
I've noticed that this guideline is not very well known, even among editors with tens of thousands of edits, so it isn't surprising that I point this out to some veteran editors, but there are some t's that need to be crossed.
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Bastun}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.
Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
BastunĖġáḍβáś₮ŭŃ! 13:42, 5 January 2024 (UTC)