User talk:Mrsminnick

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Mrsminnick, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Claudia Katz Minnick, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! KGirlTrucker81^{talk what I'm been doing} 13:55, 31 July 2016 (UTC) http://www.imdb.com/name/nm1034386/==Proposed deletion of Claudia Katz Minnick==[reply]

The article Claudia Katz Minnick has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. KGirlTrucker81^{talk what I'm been doing} 13:55, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Https---upload.wikimedia.org-wikipedia-commons-3-3d---Claudia Katz Minnick--.jpeg[edit]

A tag has been placed on File:Https---upload.wikimedia.org-wikipedia-commons-3-3d---Claudia Katz Minnick--.jpeg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 00:54, 6 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Claudia Katz Minnick.jpeg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Claudia Katz Minnick.jpeg, which you've attributed to http://www.imdb.com/name/nm1034386/. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 00:56, 6 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Claudia Katz Minnick for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Claudia Katz Minnick is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Claudia Katz Minnick until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. A Train^talk 10:06, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Why Claudia Katz Minnick has been proposed for deletion[edit]

Hey there! I just wanted to drop you a line about Claudia Katz Minnick, the article that you've largely written yourself and has now been proposed for deletion. Wikipedia can be intimidating at first because there's some non-obvious rules and not every subject in the world qualifies for an article.

Specifically, the guidelines for articles about actors are right here: Wikipedia:Notability_(people)#Entertainers.

Has had significant roles in multiple notable films, television shows, stage performances, or other productions.
Has a large fan base or a significant "cult" following.
Has made unique, prolific or innovative contributions to a field of entertainment.

If you can find us some magazine or newspaper articles (from say, Variety or the LA Times) that assert any of those above bullet points, drop me a note and I'll help you work them into the article. Because at the moment the article seems to be about an actor who's done a lot of roles in really good movies, but nothing that somebody could really call a "significant" role. Again, sorry for any frustration and let me know if I can help you improve the article. Cheers A Train^talk 10:14, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]