User talk:Msoos

My Summer of Love

Hello! thank you for your opinion. Unfortunately the article has received criticism lately to be "horribly POV-ish". I remove one heavily criticised expression and I really think the article is POV free now. So I do not think it is justifyable to call the article "POV-ish". What's your opinion

American Civil Rights Movement

Please vote for the American Civil Rights Movement in the nominations for the Article Improvement Drive. [Click here and scroll down to (Nominated in August or later: American Civil Rights Movement... to cast your vote]. Thanks! Mamawrites 03:55, 27 August 2005 (UTC)

Reason for revert

Hey Msoos. I reverted your addition to Paula Kelly because it said the same thing as the previous sentence. Cheers. Moriori 23:06, September 2, 2005 (UTC)

Images

Hello. You have tagged the images you uploaded as GPL (which is a free software license). Did you mean to tag them {{GFDL}} instead, since this is what Wikipedia is licensed under? Angela. 05:08, 24 September 2005 (UTC)

Help with AfD

Msoos, there is currenty an AfD that we really need a native Hungarian to help with.Would you mind?Jean-Pierre_Ady_Fenyo (AfD Discussion).He claims that his verifiability is in Hungarian print, especially in Budapest.We would appreciate your opinions on the matter. --Michael ^(talk) 23:36, 27 November 2005 (UTC)

• Thank you for your input. --Michael ^(talk) 16:31, 28 November 2005 (UTC)

Szegyen

Azt hogy ugy (hibazva) irtam hogy Irodalom es Elet, mikor en is jol tudom hogy forditva van, es te ebbol csinalsz ugyet csak azt bizonyitja hogy maga szandekossan bantani akarsz. Valoszinuleg en tobb mint tiz evvel idosebb vagyok nalad, talan husz is (!), es hogy nem volt irantam semmi trisztelett bizonyitja hogy szemtelen vagy. Figyelj csak, nem az szamit hogy hany szor publikalva voltam hannem hogy egyaltalan egy komoly publikaciot kaptam amelyben nyilvanvalo hogy filozofus vagyok. Bezeg maga soha nem nezte jol es reszletessen a szervezetem web-site-ja (www.infinitysociety.org). A felesegem (nem en) ugy gondolja hogy FIDESZ vagy MDF parti vagy. Talan MIEPes. En pedig buszke vagyok hogy inkabb as SZDSZ es az uj MSZP-hez kozel alok. Persze, ok se tokeletesek, de legalabb nem beteg anti-Szemitak. A nazik es a magyar fascistak gyilkoltak minket, aztan a Stalinistak is akartak kinyirni minket, es magyarorszag (cseh-orzag-hoz elenteve) soha nem adta nekunk vissza azt amit nagyapam oly nehezzen dolgozot erte, egy nagy villa Budan amelynek az arra most tobb mint 3 million dollart er! Tul eltem en is ket evvet haboruban, sot engem elraboltak egyszer (hala Y'H'V'H'nak tul-eltem azt is). Beszelek tobb mint hat nyelven, eltem sokk helyen vilagszerte, es maga, minelkul hogy igazan ismer, hamis dolgokat alitt rolam! Hogy kepzeled ezt??

• U. I. Magyaroknak: Ezt ne higgyétek el, kérlek. Nem vagyok se antiszemita, se rosszindulatú, se tiszteletlen. Egyébként az illető tényleg idősebb, mint én, és elismerem, hogy több élettapasztalata volt, mint nekem --Msoos 23:04, 28 November 2005 (UTC)

Degaussing

See Talk:Second Battle of the Atlantic

Petri net example.svg

Hi, I just copy this image on Commons. I would like to reuse your Petri Net image in french fr:Réseaux de Petri article.. Talk with me if this copy is a problem. Other case, thanks for this ! ;) (sorry my english is very poor). (Please prefer fr:Discussion Utilisateur:Boly38 to answer) --Boly38 10:16, 23 December 2005 (UTC)

Oh Waw! I saw your animated Petri network ! CoOl ;) It's just ... PERFECT :oD Best regards :) --Boly38 22:06, 14 January 2006 (UTC)

thanks for the tip

Happy new year msoos and thanks for yout tips, me and my friend ghost in the machine are trying to elevate this article to F.A status any tips suggestion or anything else is well accepted!--Philx 16:51, 1 January 2006 (UTC)

Your Petri_net_types.svg graphic has an error

Hello. Your image: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Petri_net_types.svg contains a spelling error: Assymetric should be Asymmetric Thanks.

Ambient network

Hi Máté.Sorry I can't help with this subject. I've been doing a little bit with acronyms (check history) and was simply sorting out some of the associated links.Thanks for the userpage advice, I'll try to put something in. Shrew 12:16, 30 January 2006 (UTC)

IRC

If you're the person who left me a msg this morning:

msoos please see http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Roman_infantry_tactics%2C_strategy_and_battle_formations&action=history, and the two anonymous IP's "contributions"(=vandalisms), and revert+block IPs. Thanks.

I need to inform you that I am not an admin.Yes, I know my name shows up a LOT on vandal reverts but I have no admin powers whatsoever.However, I have passed your request for review and consideration onto someone who is an admin and it has been looked at. If you need anything done in the future, I can take a look at it and pass it on to an admin who will do something if it needs doing but I can't do it directly so don't expect anything fast from me. It's great to see you on Wikipedia! Tawker 04:54, 15 February 2006 (UTC)

Roman army

I read somewhere, that in the roman army there were Greek legions. Meaning, legions, whose bulk was entirely by Greek soldiers. Since the Ancient Europeen civilization was Greek-Roman and there were many greeks in Rome, is that possible or it's just a speculation? As the two cultures were very much alike I come to think that it's not so impossible. Thanks for your attention: Elan Morin Tedronai 17:58, 15 March 2006 (UTC)

ARK

It was not a joke link - Hobart's Funnies is not a joke entry and the Churchill tank was one of the first "ARK"sGraemeLeggett 15:21, 30 March 2006 (UTC)

copyvio

Üdv, hát remélem pozitívan válaszolnak, nekem is jobban tetszik az a kép természetesen... Ezzel együtt a belinkelt oldalon elég egyértelműen leírják, hogy minden jog fenntartva :( SyP 18:44, 7 April 2006 (UTC)

crypto corner

I've only just noticed your addition to the crypto corner crew. Welcome. It's an odd place, but we have some affection for it, and we're one of the most active (or accomplished, depending on perspective) Projects on the English WP edition. Have at it, we'll conquer the world for crypto yet!

Glad to have you aboard. ww 19:54, 24 April 2006 (UTC)

created articles

M,

I'm glad to have my suspicion that you're from Hungary confirmed. Your name is not quite enough of a hint (at least to this English monoglot) to be sure.

As for your invitation to comment on Timing Attack and Crypto Primitive, the following. Timing attack, it seems to me is just about right. An introduction, and explanation, some examples, and some context within which to understand it. My quibbles are largely about the odd sentence which needs a tweak and some English phrasing. Good job, I think, and I'll try to remember to get to it and clean up a bit. The primitive article is more problematic. There are similar phrasing problems here and there, but the structure is a bit thin. I can see (I think) what you have in mind in several places, but it doesn't quite make it onto the page. I'll try to drop by and have a go at it as well.

Re-welcome. ww 07:36, 1 May 2006 (UTC)

It's a long term process. Since all the folks on WP are all volunteers, and since anyone can change (delete, modify, ...) whatever they like, it's even longer. We cryptiacs are writing technically based material which has a twisty and tricky quality to it. The content, for which style isn't really important, is paramount, yet many editors concentrate on style and existing content can be (and too often is) lost or altered. As you note, keeping watch is important, lest the changes get out of hand. We all get to do some of the patrolling fun. ww 18:50, 7 May 2006 (UTC)

Zahira College Colombo

Hi friend you initiated a copyvio notice on this article. Actually this article was written by me, see this [www.geocities.com/Zahira_College_Colombo www.geocities.com/Zahira_College_Colombo] but I had no way to prove it. Now I have included a copyright notice at the bottom of the article (GFDL), this allows anyone to copy from the site. So the copyvio tag has to be reconsidered. I have also made the copyvio notice to point to the actual webpage I copied from which was created by me.  «₪Mÿš†íc₪»  ^(T) 11:31, 9 May 2006 (UTC)

Hi Again I didn't want to outsmart anyone, if you felt that way I am really sorry

, Its important to me because its my alma matter . The same article could be found at www.azzahira.com as well; See I contributed to this website long time back, Now the administrator of the website is someone else. The angelfire website is not mine, I am sure some pupil of the college copied it from the original website and posted it there. Derek Ross tole me to include the GFDL, I didn't know about this till he told me. The next moment he told me I put the notice there. Thanks.  «₪Mÿš†íc₪»  ^(T) 14:59, 12 May 2006 (UTC)

phrasing at timing attack and crypto primitive

Per your invitation, I had a brief pass at these two articles. Mostly phrasing improvements, I think, but you might want to take a look for content. ww 17:35, 10 May 2006 (UTC)

Buchenwald (answer)

Unfortunately, I do not have the negatives, the photographer at the time of request for a pulling with be-saying lost!Fortunately I work in the edition and I have a scanner professionel.I am glad you appreciate them, it is better to show these images in the world than to forget them in a drawer. I will have pleasure to forward your compliments to my father in law, the autor who's 80 years old and who participated to the liberation with the US army in Buchenwald --Luc Viatour 19:10, 15 June 2006 (UTC)

90 days --> 180 days

Yeah, I can see why. The only reason I found the policy was browsing through the 'Proposed Policies' category because I was bored and wanted to vote in something! If the policy had more exposure I bet people would take notice. Go look at Community Portal - the current events bit at the top hasn't changed in days - why not add the policy to that? I always look there for stuff I can get involved in. Good luck, anyways. —Vanderdecken∴∫ξφ 09:16, 16 June 2006 (UTC)

Done and done. Take a little lookee at the Community Portal...—Vanderdecken∴∫ξφ 19:11, 16 June 2006 (UTC)

WP:DUU90 again

Hello Máté,

Since I originally created the straw poll at WP:DUU90 and posted it on the Community Portal, the project has had an amazing wave of success. Recently that began to decline again, so I reposted the project on the Community Portal. Now the proposal stands at 212 Support, 6 Conditional Supports (two of which have had the conditions satisifed, so it's safe to assume they count as Supports), and only 14 Oppose (some of which have been proved to be wrong, so that might decrease as well).

In other words, the idea has been an overwhelming success, and I would like to propose to you that you make this known to the administrators, the Sysops and even the Board of Directors and Jimmy Wales himself. This revolution of thinking has come a long way since the first edition and we have you to thank for the little spark of thought which started it. I suggest that we make this known to the Admins, Leaders and Sysops and finally get something done about WP:DUU90. Thank you. —Vanderdecken∴ ∫ξφ 19:08, 6 July 2006 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles.Have fun!

Stubs Formation (military) Cryptographic protocol Loulan Metropolitan area network Web development Nankai Electric Railway Schiltron Wonder weapons Fifth Military District Onager (siege weapon) Castra Erythorbic acid Centuria Hoplite Benjamin Sehene Kyrgyz language Boris Savinkov Pixel image editor Norman Schwarzkopf, Sr.

Cleanup Akhil Bharatiya Vidyarthi Parishad Computer cooling Bridge tap Merge Roman military structure Twisted pair Enterprise software Add Sources Publius Venditius Bear River Massacre Elsie MacGill Wikify National Audit Office R2 signalling Charles DeLisi Expand Emergency Response Team Siege of Singara Samnite Wars

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians.It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work.Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page.Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page.If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot 12:17, 16 July 2006 (UTC)

My Summer of Love

Hello! thank you for your opinion. Unfortunately the article has received criticism lately to be "horribly POV-ish". I remove one heavily criticised expression and I really think the article is POV free now. So I do not think it is justifyable to call the article "POV-ish". What's your opinion?

Concerning the films you have mentioned I have to admit that I have not seen them yet (I will try to change this). I am not really specialised on British films. I am rather focused on certain directors. The article of "My Summer of Love is actually my first wiki edit and I am still watching over it and I try to add every piece of new informatin I can grab. Up to now I must have watched the movie 20 times and I think I read pretty much everything I could find about it on the internet (German and English) - Lacoby, 23 July 06

Image:Gyurcsany Ferenc.jpg

Hi, the current tag says: "This file is in the public domain, because it is a work of the Office of the Prime Minister of the Hungarian Government."

This is new to me. So the PM's office puts all its work in the public domain? Do you have any references for this?

Thanks, nyenyec ☎ 22:24, 14 August 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for the answer. Could you update the license tag at: commons:Image:Gyurcsany Ferenc.jpg? -- nyenyec ☎ 14:37, 16 August 2006 (UTC)

Petri Net

hi Msoos, I'm responding to your post on my talk page.Nice rework of this article, (although 95% might be a bit of hyperbole).Your rework represents the latest substantial improvement since Rp's initial efforts, and the involvement of a number of other "editors" including myself.Rp and I are looking at the issue of formal definitions.See his post and my response buried in the middle of the talk page for this article.I think the underlying goal here is presenting a balanced treatment of this topic. Vonkje 04:33, 21 August 2006 (UTC)

Compressor Stall article confusion

The trivia section addition to the Compressor Stall article is rather vague.Could you perhaps clear up your meaning as outlined on the talk page?Thanks. -- Scetoaux 01:49, 20 September 2006 (UTC)

Question on my talk page

You recently left a question about watermarking attack on my user talk page (User talk:Intgr#Watermarking attack). I'm letting you know that I've responded to it just in case you haven't checked back yet. Or if you have, I've extended my response so you might want to revisit it. :) -- intgr 12:50, 3 October 2006 (UTC)

WP:FILMS Newsletter

The December 2006 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published.You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link.Thank you.Please also, if you have not already, add your name to the Member List. Cbrown1023 00:44, 22 December 2006 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Ashes And Diamonds screenshot.png

Thanks for uploading Image:Ashes And Diamonds screenshot.png. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. (ESkog)^(Talk) 21:19, 14 May 2007 (UTC)

Re: GyF

In reply to the heated comment you left me regarding this article: the dispute between User:Beyond silence and myself was not about the doping scandal sentence, though at the end there were some reverts regarding that as well. BS had been removing perfectly referenced and neutral statements about Gyurcsány's religious affiliation ([1], [2], [3], [4], [5]), and adding ungrammatical and/or otherwise inappropriate material ([6], [7], [8], [9], [10]). While at it, he launched personal attacks against me in an edit summary ([11]), in e-mails (possibly hoping to "troll out" my mail address? - he didn't get it), and on my talk page. I have to question the sincerity of the only apology he offered about the latter – on his own talk page, and not very verbosely –, because at the same time, he sent me another mail (which I discovered weeks later in my spam folder) saying just this in the subject line: "köcsög". (That's approximately "asshole", for those who read this but don't understand Hungarian.) Finally, the page got protected due to his documented violation of 3RR.

On my part, all that I did was try to limit his POV-pushing destruction by putting back whatever he tried to remove without justification. Superficially, he did try (or pretend? – I don't care to find out which) to justify his removals, but all he could say basically boiled down to "it's wrong because I don't think so". At the same time, even though the subject does not fit my area of interest and I didn't mean to contribute to the article initially, I did improve minor things. I mainly copyedited broken English, added/improved references, and rephrased the "religious affiliation" paragraph from a mild anti-Gyurcsány POV to neutral (see here, here, and here). There is circumstantial evidence that what I did to the article was right: the only two users that provided third opinions following my request at the Hungarian noticeboard both reverted to an earlier revision by me ([12], [13]).

I couldn't care less about edit counts to either this article or in general. If it troubles you that my edits of minor import number more than yours that were no doubt more substantial, well, there is nothing I can do for you. Be comforted with the fact that the job of reverting aggressive POV-pushers, while I consider it absolutely necessary, is not my favourite either.

Finally, please refrain from profanity when writing to my talk page. Also, please use English as we are supposed to; this should not be a problem since your userpage says you are en-4.

Regards, KissL 13:26, 24 September 2007 (UTC)

Invitation to events: bot, template, and Gadget makers wanted

I thought you might want to know about some upcoming events where you can learn more about MediaWiki customization and development, extending functionality with JavaScript, the future of ResourceLoader and Gadgets, the new Lua templating system, how to best use the web API for bots, and various upcoming features and changes. We'd love to have power users, bot maintainers and writers, and template makers at these events so we can all learn from each other and chat about what needs doing.

Check out the Chennai event in March, the Berlin hackathon in June, the developers' days preceding Wikimania in July in Washington, DC, or any other of our events.

Best wishes! - Sumana Harihareswara, Wikimedia Foundation's Volunteer Development Coordinator. Please reply on my talk page, here or at mediawiki.org. Sumanah (talk) 14:52, 16 February 2012 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Msoos. You have new messages at RJaguar3's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

RJaguar3 | u | t 16:59, 30 July 2012 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:06, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Msoos. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Women in Red World Contest

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

Proposed deletion of File:The Bubble project DKNY.jpg

The file File:The Bubble project DKNY.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No author, no source (dead link, not archived), no clear indication about the license.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. -- 2simple (talk) 14:41, 16 May 2020 (UTC)