User talk:Mtmelendez/Archive 3
 | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 |
THank you for your help! User talk:96.229.179.106
Copyvio
Thanks. I actually glanced at the source once before and somehow missed it. I guess second time's the charm. Cheers, --Bfigura (talk) 03:12, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
My RfA
Thank you for your very well-written nomination. Unfortunately, the "crowd" doesn't like many noms, for several reasons, and I agree with some of them. Therefore, I have only accepted three of the noms. Please don't take this the wrong way, Marcos. I truly respect you and thank you for your beautiful words. I hope to see them once again in the RfA :-) Perdón, mano, pero hay que complacerlos. Tu sabes como es la cosa. Happy editing! --Agüeybaná 15:23, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
Overlistification
I had already converted it into an essay ages ago when I realized inclusionists were trying to tear it apart so that the continued list-deletions would stop. I honestly think there can be no progress because I already asked 20 different people to help change it so that it fits a more general view. Instead inclusionists just bitch that it was written by one person and ask it be deleted. Sigh - that's the world of deletionist vs inclusionist. Bulldog123 20:06, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
- That certainly seems like the only way to go about. And I'm generally fine with that. It just really gets irritating when inclusionists starting canvassing their friends on Afds/Cfds and soon the entire thing ends in a "no consensus" default keep against true consensus. That's happened enough for me to try to write an WP:OLIST. Though I have yet to find anyone would would willingly co-write it (edit it) with me. Bulldog123 03:19, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
Puerto Rican Spindalis GAC on hold
Hey. I just reviewed Puerto Rican Spindalis and put it on hold. I left some notes on how to improve the article; please go by and look at them. I'll look at the article again in a week or so. Rufous-crowned Sparrow 16:28, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
- Its been almost a week and there have been no edits to the article. Are you still intending on working on it? Rufous-crowned Sparrow 01:08, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
- Will do. Feel free to renominate- it is very very very close to being GA in my book. Thanks. Rufous-crowned Sparrow 01:43, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
Nutrition Assisance for Puerto Rico
Another one! [1]- Caribbean~H.Q. 01:43, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
- Good work, my friend! --Agüeybaná 02:18, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
- Phew. I thought Taxman's concerns were going to kill its chances, but I took a few days and answered his concerns. So, let's start working on the next one! - Mtmelendez (Talk|UB|Home) 10:40, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
Re:Redirect
Hi. What a coincidence, I just imagined the "new messeges" tab today and I got it. Well, I thought, "Wikipedia Day" is January 15. Comet McNaught peaked in brightness at around that time. I doubt very many people will be searching for it, the "Wikipedia Day" comet, so if it isn't good enough for a proper redirect, delete it. After all, my account was barely 3 months old when I created that redirect. It's like calling the Indian Ocean tsunami the "Indian Christmas tsunami", or the like. If you don't like it, feel free to RfD it. Thanks. ~AH1(TCU) 02:02, 14 October 2007 (UTC)
A Sister's Kiss
I got the infor from the director of the movie —Preceding unsigned comment added by Michaellovesnyc (talk • contribs) 02:05, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
Speedy deletion of Caribbean School
A tag has been placed on Caribbean School, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia per CSD A7.
Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the page's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. Rjd0060 04:13, 15 October 2007 (UTC)
WP:RAD
Hey, I just got your note saying my redirect was deleted. I was wondering if that could be reinstated? I use the redirect in my signature and will change it to a more appropriate term, since you deem it unacceptable, but for now, this means that anybody trying to use my name in my signature is unable, and this makes matter difficult for any discussions I've had in recent weeks. Quite frankly, I would have liked some notice, as this was definitely not a candidate for speedy deletion. If you use the "what links here" function, you'll see there are several hundred uses of it, and it's (no offence meant) quite inconsiderate to speedily delete something that frequently used. --lincalinca 03:11, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
- I by no means am conceited enough to believe that I'm a "supereditor" or am entitled to anything greater than other editors, but a little bit of leniency for a couple of weeks to allow for any signatures I've already posted to be able to work. Your suggestion of a bot is a good one, but I don't have a bot, bot approval and most importantly, no idea how to run one. If you could put something in for that, my argument is over, but otherwise, just a little bit of amnesty is all I ask. As to the nominator letting me know, that never happened. And I changed it as soon as I read your message, hoping to avert any issues that may arise. --lincalinca 05:07, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
Xavier Romeu
== Please refer to the entry on Xavier Romeu.
The most important issue surrounding the biography of Mr. Romeu is the fact that he will go on trial on Monday October 22, 2007. The entries are designed to influence public opinion and sway the jury in a particular direction. These have been carefully and diligently engineered by those opposed to Mr. Romeu's ideals. All these matters should be vented in court and allow a judge and a jury of his peers be the final arbiter of truth. The trial should not be held using Wikipedia as its venue. It is unfair and potentially libelous for Wikipedia to continue publishing opinions, which are in turn supported by articles with a particular political bent and not based on factual evidence.
May I suggest that we simply state the basic facts about his education and his positions while in government service. Anything else would be a unfair.
Mr. Romeu's freedom is at stake. Wikipedia should exercise its responsability as the fair publisher we all know it to be..
I strongly urge not to run the page in its current statBarendfabritius 03:12, 21 October 2007 (UTC)e exactly while his case is being heard by a court.
Xavier Romeu
Hi Mtmelendez: I strongly disagree with Barendfabritius' statements above. The current article summarizes undisputed facts and presents a NPOV. The fact that Mr. Romeu has been investigated for certain actions does not need to be vented anywhere. It happened. Quoted sources (which are being constantly erased by vandals) include the Associated Press and WOW News (which is affiliated to mainstream, conservative leaning Casiano Communications). How is the article libelous? To state that someone is trying to sway a Romeu jury through Wikipedia contributions also seems a bit of a stretch.
I welcome your intervention as well as NPOV contributions from responsible wiki contributors… but the edits by some of these vandals are shameless political propaganda and completely against wiki policies.
I look forward to the continued improvement of this and all Puerto Rico related articles.
Saludos, PR —Preceding unsigned comment added by PeterRosello (talk • contribs) 00:18, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
I've posted comments at Wikipedia:Featured portal candidates/Portal:Puerto Rico. Please try to see to them. Joe I 07:26, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
Userboxes and non-free images
Oh wow! Im sorry, I didn't know. I have no Idea which ones are fair use, so could you please remove the ones that aren't from my page? If you could that would be so helpful! Thanks! Flamingtorch372 12:02, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
I have a question. Is there a quick and easy way for telling if something is fair use? Cause sometimes I make random userboxes and I want to make sure the pics I use are alright to use. Thanks! Flamingtorch372 02:49, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
Ok, one last question for now. Would this picture be free to use on my page? Image:Jimi Hendrix Statue(2).jpg Flamingtorch372 20:53, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Comisión Independiente de Ciudadanos para Evaluar Transacciones Gubernamentales, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Comisión Independiente de Ciudadanos para Evaluar Transacciones Gubernamentales is a redirect to a non-existent page (CSD R1).
To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Comisión Independiente de Ciudadanos para Evaluar Transacciones Gubernamentales, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. CSDWarnBot 13:31, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
'
Romeu edits:
I removed unsourced, possibly inflammatory information in the article. As this comment points out, the subject of the article is currently under trial, and this type of information cannot be included in the article without sources. Any suggestions on how to proceed are welcome. - Mtmelendez (Talk) 01:23, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
Here are sources for the comments removed: 1) government credit card use for personal expenses (a news article from Primera Hora dated October 11th 2003 : http://blueribbonpr.org/noticias/starcom.php —Preceding unsigned comment added by PeterRosello (talk • contribs) 02:00, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
How would you draft the sentence? Remember, we must be neutral. - Mtmelendez (Talk) 02:05, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
"Among the controversies were Mr. Romeu's use of government credit cards for personal expenses and the creation and management of the PRIIF."
Lets extract the "extravagant" which is subjective. What do you think?
Source for second removed statement: The Committee concluded that Mr. Romeu improperly disbursed approximately $30 million in PRIIF funds to private companies by issuing 24 grant checks during the last two days of December 2000 after his New Progressive Party (PNP) lost the general elections in November
http://blueribbonpr.org/informes/9-PRIIF%20II%20-%20Informe%202003-04a.pdf
page 4 last paragraph. This is the actual Blue Ribbon report.
The fact that Mr. Romeu has been investigated for these actions and that the committe concluded there were imporpiaties is a fact and is not subject to interpretation. I repectfully request you consider reverting your latest edits now that the statements have been properly sourced.
RE:Portal:Puerto Rico
|
The Tireless Contributor Barnstar | |
| For almost single-handedly bringing P:PUR to featured quality, I award you the Tireless Contributor Barnstar. Felicidades! --Agüeybaná 11:10, 25 October 2007 (UTC) |
Great job
Great job on the PR Portal. I have some great news that you should include in the portal. On October 19, 2007, NASA announced that Joseph M. Acaba will be the first "Boricua" in space this coming fall (2008). Tony the Marine 16:12, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
Hedwig0407 supages
Hello. Thank you for deleting my enormous quantity of subpages. I really appreciates that. I just reformat my whole userpage so that i wont use quite a lot of subpages. Thank you again. About my talk page... lol i understand... being so busy focusing on what you do sometimes you did some mistakes. lol Anyway, you still manage to undid deleting my mytalk page.. and no damage done. Sorry for giving you a lot of delete works ;) More power and keep up the good work! -- Hedwig0407 (Talk) 14:23, 26 October 2007 (UTC)
?
WHY THE FUCK SHOULD I CREATE AN ACCOUNT? SO MY PAGES COULD GET DELETED WHILE MANY NON-NOTABLE ONES REMAIN IN PLACE? HELL TO THE NO!!!!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.230.106.113 (talk) 05:37, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
I'm sure this user meant to say: "Why exactly do I need to create an account? Account users who create pages get their child articles killed off; while the non-notable articles, like UserWarthogdemon, for instance, still get to remain." Wilhelmina Will 05:42, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
DO NOT SPEAK 4 ME. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.230.106.113 (talk) 05:52, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
Re:Broken Redirects -
Delete them, thanks F9T 18:11, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
I must still have a lot to learn about the criteria for speedy deletion. This looked like an attack page, because of content like "John is a Dougebad", or something like that. It also looked like it contained nonsense.--U.S.A.U.S.A.U.S.A. deleted contribs 22:17, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
I think this user needs help
I noticed you recently deleted Talk:Plantscience (rightly), I noticed because I had erroneously placed a welcome message there to User:Plantscience who has his or her signature linked to Plantscience. I've left a new welcome message for the user on User_talk:Plantscience in which I point this out. Is it appropriate for me to change the signatures on Wikipedia:WikiProject Agriculture (two of only four edits by this user) to link to the correct User_talk page? They are very confusing the way they currently link to redlinked article space.--Doug.(talk • contribs) 15:02, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
ACID Atom
The article Atom, which you voted for the Article Collaboration and Improvement Drive on September 4, and was removed on September 11, because on one got around to choosing it as the winner, has been renominated and needs votes. Zginder 16:09, 10 November 2007 (UTC)
It's Doggy
Sorry about that. I don't get what was wrong with it. I just didn't know what to write about. Oh well.
Next is going to be about..... Wha haa haaa!!!!! :p —Preceding unsigned comment added by Pomergirl (talk • contribs) 20:05, 12 November 2007 (UTC)
HELP ME
I had a page deleted (sigh) and I need help on what to write about.
Thanks --Pomergirl 20:39, 12 November 2007 (UTC)Lollipup
Advice
Thanks that helps a whole lot! :) good advice. Thanks --Pomergirl 20:53, 12 November 2007 (UTC)Lollipup
hi Mt - about the U.S. Open move
So... it's a good thing that you fixed the problem. Now U.S. and U.S . both go to the US page. The bad thing is that this is not the proper name for the tournament. It should be U.S. Open Can you move the US to the U.S. page? And can you tell me how to do that without killing all redirects, etc.? We don't want a link to not connect to the U.S. Open article lol. thanks GoldenGoose100 11:10, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
- Ok so how do we change the US Open page to rename it U.S. Open? US is not correct as U.S. and U.S.A. are both acronyms with periods between. It's not like NASA or something. It's U.S.
- I can't move the article because the U.S. Open page already exists. Does it need to be deleted so that the US Open can be moved to U.S. Open title? GoldenGoose100 12:12, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
Advice 2
Ok thanks again!--Pomergirl 12:24, 13 November 2007 (UTC)Lollipup ?who deleted my page any way?
Advice 2A
Hey Mt, you wrote on my user page and now it is blue (or created) How do I get it back to red (not created)? GoldenGoose100 12:34, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
Minor edit on my user page
Thanks. Rudget zŋ 16:01, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
When closing RFDs...
please remember to untag the redirect page. I removed them from Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2007_October_15#Colorado_State_Highway_Route_72_.E2.86.92_State_highways_in_Colorado and its sister route. They keep showing up as unresolved otherwise. Thanks, Carlossuarez46 20:45, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
- No problem. I'm doing my twice weekly short pages patrol, lots of ap-cray this time around. Eres tu puertoriqueño? Carlossuarez46 21:08, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
People are mean
I made a new topic about choodles a mixed breed do (chihuahua and poodle) and I wasn't even finished and some guy comes and deletes my page and says wikipedia is not a dictionary. is he kiding ME??! I see many stupid pages and they aren't deleted. I need more Info —Preceding unsigned comment added by Pomergirl (talk • contribs) 23:22, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
Choodle 2
I have got no idea on infomation about the breed. Not many people have them. and what it is is all I know. I don't know what to write about everyone already took some of my ideas.--Pomergirl 23:02, 15 November 2007 (UTC)Lollipup
Re: Wikiproject Starcraft***
Sorry move any pages with WikiProject StarCraft to Wikiproject StarCraft. Notice the lower case "p" on the Wikiproject name.--iSoroush (talk) 12:54, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
- Oh ya... ok now its open for other people I was just inaugurating the project that's why. And I fixed my signature btw im sorry about the problems it may have caused. --Storkian aka iSoroush Talk 00:17, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
?,?,and?
My main intrest are animals, like dogs. I like to listen to Rap/Hiphop. I don't want to write about North Carolina because that would be boring for my topic. All breeds of dogs are all ready used. And all I can write about is that STUPID it's doggy idea thing. But that was deleted, so. I just don't know. :( ---- Pomergirl (talk) 21:36, 16 November 2007 (UTC)Lollipup
I can't explain it in a Subject/headline
Snacker Crackerz!!!!! /:( Everybody picks all the singers and It's all perfect!!! I think that the people who make these articals are "profectionalz" (by the way is there any thing in the whole wide world i can write about?) Can it be about something I made up?
Pomergirl (talk) 21:51, 16 November 2007 (UTC)Lollipup
OK
Darn!!! I have to think of something else!--Pomergirl (talk) 01:26, 17 November 2007 (UTC)Lollipup
Studio2 New Zealand
for some reason. i cant find my studio2 page. random ae
--Jaydend (talk) 08:44, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
I have a question, please?
Hi Mt,
I wish I could just post a question to the entire Wikipedia community, so that I could get a close-to-instant answer. You seem to be friendly so I will just ask you for now (because e-mailing Wikipedia is too slow) Anyway, I was wondering how to insert text into the article, but it doesn't show up - like a note to those editing, but that note doesn't show when viewing the article. I can't find it on help page lol. What is it called and how do you do it? Thanks GoldenGoose100 (talk) 23:48, 17 November 2007 (UTC)
- a-thank you! I will use this code with good caution. till next time GoldenGoose100 (talk) 02:12, 18 November 2007 (UTC)
- p.s. - What's the quickest way to get help about wikipedia, besides just contacting/bothering you?
- Thanks a lot Mtmelendez! GoldenGoose100 (talk) 16:57, 18 November 2007 (UTC)
- p.s. - What's the quickest way to get help about wikipedia, besides just contacting/bothering you?
User page
How and what are userpages for? thanks --Pomergirl (talk) 12:28, 18 November 2007 (UTC)Lollipup
Can you help me on my StarCraft wikiproject?
I was wondering if you or anyone you think that you can recruit to help me promote the StarCraft WikiProject ? Most of the game wikiprojects aren't active right now because the majority of the contributers have school and work and etc right now , usually they would edit during summer time or any other known holidays. also please do not delete the wikiproject :( because StarCraft 2 players will soon start looking for corrosponding articles. (thanx for editing and redirecting in the source code etc btw)=) --Storkian aka iSoroush Talk 21:08, 18 November 2007 (UTC)
If it goes against Wikipdia regulations and et cetra blabalbalba or you just don't want to then simply respond "No" on my user page (its ok i don't mind the simple-worded tone of no).
Thanks in advance--Storkian aka iSoroush Talk 21:08, 18 November 2007 (UTC)
CSD
Oh, right. Sorry about that. I didn't know what category to add it. Thanks for the explaining it to me. Zenlax T C S 21:15, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
ARTICLE HELP
Thanks for your imformation, now I know what userpages are for, and I can create one sometime. By the way can userpages be deleted like articles?--Pomergirl (talk) 23:40, 19 November 2007 (UTC)Lollipup
Legal age
After reading this thread, I became curious as to what the age of consent is here at home. I assume you know. Could you be so kind as to inform me? --Agüeybaná (talk) 01:10, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
USER BOXES
What can your userpage be about and not about exactly? Thanks, --Pomergirl (talk) 21:49, 20 November 2007 (UTC)Lollipup
Mainspace vs total edits in Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2007/Vote
I saw your comment on the talk page of [2].
The instructions state:
In order to vote, you must have an account registered with at least 150 mainspace edits before the start of the nomination process 1 November 2007.
If you have multiple accounts, you may only vote with one. Voting with multiple accounts will result in all your votes being declared void and a possible block on all accounts.
To check when your account was created, go to the user creation log, and enter your username in the "User" field. To check your number of edits, see number of edits in your user preferences.
The number of edits in the user preferences is not the same as the number of mainspace edits unless a users edits only in mainspace and the check on number of edits using the instuctions above will not tell a user if they have the correct number of main space edits.Uncle uncle uncle (talk) 03:32, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
I placed this same message on the voting talk page. Uncle uncle uncle (talk) 03:34, 21 November 2007 (UTC)
Yay!!
Yay I made a user page!!!! :)--Pomergirl (talk) 20:42, 21 November 2007 (UTC)Lollipup
Userpage 3
Thanks Now my userpage looks neater!!!!! yipee!! :) --Pomergirl (talk) 21:06, 21 November 2007 (UTC)Lollipup
Hi
I have a question... is Wikipedia the real party of Ivy Leagues or the last supper of parties for Sub-Ivy Leaguers? Let me refrain... Do you know a guy named Gerald? Gerald Joseph from San Francisco (Pfff (talk) 22:17, 21 November 2007 (UTC))
Uploading Images
How do you upload images????? I didn't understand what to do. :@ Thanks--Pomergirl (talk) 20:17, 22 November 2007 (UTC)Lollipup
Re: Comment from Mtmelendez
Hi Gurch. I was wondering if you would consider creating User:Gurch/Reports/ArbComElections for the 2007 elections? - Mtmelendez (Talk) 11:50, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
- Yes – Gurch 11:54, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
Cybergun Article removal
I do not understand how the inclusion of Information of the current Cybergun Ban (November 19th) would be classified for the reason you had removed them. This is a legitimate boycott supported by Airsoft Hobbyists and to remove the entry created only acts as a greater disservice to Airsofters. The issue is an important one facing US Airsofters and the company being boycotted has caused trouble for airsoft in other countries.
William Smith, Cybergun Boycott Founder... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.112.200.222 (talk) 04:13, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
images
Mtmelendez! Answer my question! :) How do you upload images? Thanks --Pomergirl (talk) 10:30, 26 November 2007 (UTC)Lollipup
Signpost coverage of ArbCom elections
I wouldn't mind such a link, although I think that's something that you should bring up on the elections' talk page, because there may be some opposition to doing so. Ral315 » 02:41, 28 November 2007 (UTC)
Image2
I uploaded an image on my userpage just to try, thanks for telling me how to do that. --Pomergirl (talk) 22:38, 28 November 2007 (UTC)Lollipup
Honored by the PR Senate
My dear friends in Wikipedia,
I would like to share with you that today, November 28, 2007, I was honored by the Senate of Puerto Rico with the "Resolution of the Senate Number 3603" in appreciation for my work in Wikipedia regarding Puerto Rican military related articles. I was given the resolution on behalf of the Senate by the President of the Puerto Rican Senate, the honorable Kenneth McClintock. It was a total surprise which I did not expect and that is why I want to share this news with you my firend. Tony the Marine (talk) 04:40, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
Deleting talk pages
Hi. I see you've been deleting the talk pages of cricketers where there is no article on them (Graham Botting, Mayu Pasupati). You're quite right to do so, but if you felt it appropriate there is an alternative: you could convert the talk pages into the articles, since that's what they actually are. In WP:CRIC we have a sporadic, probably antipodean contributor operating from different IP addresses who creates one or two new articles on first-class cricketers most days - but then always puts them on a talk page rather than an article page. The articles are brief and not terribly valuable (and occasionally include a bit of mischief). But in that one of the long-term aims of the cricket project is to create an article for every first-class cricketer (which is the definition of notability in this area) then the articles probably have to be created at some stage, so it's a start. We've tried putting notices up to get this contributor to do it properly (and I'll do it again today), but to no avail so far, and he changes IP address constantly. A couple of us regularly trawl through to see what he's been doing and to move his new articles to the proper place: you're welcome to join in. Johnlp (talk) 09:17, 29 November 2007 (UTC)