User talk:Mtsuzuki

Welcome!

Hello, Mtsuzuki, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!--Biografer (talk) 01:08, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gieschen Jewelers (September 20)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Whispering was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Gieschen Jewelers and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Whispe ring 01:19, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Mtsuzuki, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Whispe ring 01:19, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Gieschen Jewelers concern[edit]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Gieschen Jewelers, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:31, 20 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Gieschen Jewelers[edit]

Hello, Mtsuzuki. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Gieschen Jewelers".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 10:36, 21 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your chonology articles[edit]

Howdy hello! I see that you are creating pretty ginormous lists of historical events. Alas, that is unlikely to get approved or used, since it appears to be copies of existing lists just made into a single page that is too large to navigate reasonably. In fact, I tried to load your sandbox, and its so big that it took my computer more than 10 whole seconds to load it, which means it is way, way, waaaaay too big. You efforts are appreciated, but I think they may be misdirected. You might wish to improve the accuracy and sourcing of existing lists of historical events. That or you might be interested in learning how to use WP:Wikidata, which is probably better suited to the sort of data heavy, completionist type edits you're making. But alas, Wikipedia are not indiscriminate collections of information, as we must have utility to our readers. CaptainEek ^{Edits Ho Cap'n!}⚓ 23:38, 3 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@CaptainEek:Wow. I didn't know you could see that. Thank you for trying to save me a ton of wasted work! I do appreciate that. But I'm actually working toward a specific goal. I don't intend to submit these draft lists. The lists are actually a very large first step toward a different contribution, which is in turn going to be the first phase to an even greater ultimate goal that, God-willing, will be a game-changer when it comes to world history. In other words, don't worry about me trying to submit these. They are just drafts that will never see publication. Thank you!Mtsuzuki (talk) 01:02, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Mtsuzuki, Ah, well in that case we can't have them either. Wikipedia is not a webhost, and having non-encycloepdia related material wastes server space. You should probably find another place to store the material, either in a word document, or another website. I'll give you a week to move stuff somewhere new before I will need to put things up for deletion :) CaptainEek ^{Edits Ho Cap'n!}⚓ 01:06, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@CaptainEek:What I mean is that these lists are an integral part of a huge special surprise contribution that I am making toward Wikipedia. And even though I disagree on the point about them being non-encyclopedia related (as they are sourced directly from Wikipedia), I understand completely that these draft lists are not something that would be published on Wikipedia since they're apparently too long for the system to load properly. At any rate, please give me a month, rather, to allow enough time to complete the project, at least for the sake of academia.Mtsuzuki (talk) 01:24, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Mtsuzuki, A surprise contribution? It would be better if you could just state what you're doing, as then the pages might get preserved. Also, I'm afraid I can only give you a week. That's actually quite generous, technically some of them could be deleted immediately. As a heads up, I will be putting the pages up for deletion, which means that the pages will get tagged. 7 days after being tagged they will likely be deleted. You have until then to move the content. CaptainEek ^{Edits Ho Cap'n!}⚓ 03:45, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@CaptainEek:I see. For future reference on other projects, is it only the length of my drafts that is the cause for deletion, or is it something else? I can't imagine it's the content, since every day of the year has its own timeline page on Wikipedia. And could you cite the specific part of policy? I've not done much with Wikipedia before. Thank you!Mtsuzuki (talk) 04:02, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Mtsuzuki, For userspace content, see What may I have in my user pages?. Otherwise, the policy is WP:NOTWEBHOST. In general, the size is one factor. But the fact that the pages are not intended for general use is the main cause. Also, because it basically duplicating existing content. CaptainEek ^{Edits Ho Cap'n!}⚓ 04:11, 4 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:3 BC TEST[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that the page you created, Draft:3 BC TEST, was tagged as a test page under section G2 of the criteria for speedy deletion and has been or soon may be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Passenger pigeon (talk) 04:53, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]