User talk:Muffin Dragon

July 2016[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Lab Rats: Elite Force has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Lab Rats: Elite Force was changed by Muffin Dragon (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.894101 on 2016-07-25T18:29:15+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 18:29, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your addition to Bizaardvark has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Amaury (talk | contribs) 19:48, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Jeremy Kent Jackson[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Jeremy Kent Jackson, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. (See section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Wikipedia has standards for the minimum necessary information to be included in short articles; you can see these at Wikipedia:Stub. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Latchem (talk) 21:14, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Muffin Dragon, you are invited to the Teahouse![edit]

Hi Muffin Dragon! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Missvain (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:03, 26 July 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of The Gaming Pug[edit]

Hello Muffin Dragon,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged The Gaming Pug for deletion, because it seems to be inappropriate for a variety of reasons.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Meiloorun talk 00:17, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Diamond Celebration[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Diamond Celebration, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.
It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Regards, James (^talk/_contribs) 15:32, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

July 2016[edit]

Please do not add or change content without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Regards, James (^talk/_contribs) 15:37, 27 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Disneyland. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Regards, James (^talk/_contribs) 21:43, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

September 2016[edit]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Disneyland Resort. SummerPhD^v2.0 14:29, 26 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

October 2016[edit]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Downtown Disney, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. James (^talk/_contribs) 08:50, 2 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Muffin[edit]

Muffin Muffin Dragon (talk) 04:04, 31 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

St. Gregory A. & M. Hovsepian School moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, St. Gregory A. & M. Hovsepian School, does not have any sources and citations to remain published. It needs citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. Please see the school article guidelines which describes how the content of school articles should be organized, with the aim of providing general guidance to editors; stubs are also to be avoided. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Steven (Editor) (talk) 21:21, 17 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of AGBU Vatche and Tamar Manoukian Performing Arts Center[edit]

Hello, Muffin Dragon

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Sulfurboy and it's nice to meet you :-)

I wanted to let you know that I’ve proposed an article that you started, AGBU Vatche and Tamar Manoukian Performing Arts Center, for deletion because it meets one of the relevant criterion. The particular issue can be located in the notice, that is now visible at the top of the article.

If you wish to prevent the deletion:

Edit the page
Remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
Click the Publish changes button.

But, please remember to explain why you think the article should be kept on the article's talk page and improve the page to address the raised issues. Otherwise, it may be deleted later by other means.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Sulfurboy}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Sulfurboy (talk) 01:16, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

April 2020[edit]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Disneyland. Sundayclose (talk) 19:32, 12 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:St. Gregory A. & M. Hovsepian School concern[edit]

Hi there, I'm MDanielsBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:St. Gregory A. & M. Hovsepian School, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. MDanielsBot (talk) 01:48, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:St. Gregory A. & M. Hovsepian School[edit]

Hello, Muffin Dragon. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "St. Gregory A. & M. Hovsepian School".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 20:30, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Misleading edit summary[edit]

Please do not leave misleading edit summaries as you used on Armenian Genocide, that edit was not fixing a typo.[1] The figure of around 1 million has consensus on talk. (t · c) buidhe 22:17, 9 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I’ve never heard a consensus about the deaths being 1 million. I’ve always heard 1.5 million Muffin Dragon (talk) 21:12, 12 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

SFG[edit]

Stonefire Grill Muffin Dragon (talk) 07:06, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Stonefire Grill moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Stonefire Grill, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. _{دَستخَط،}اِفلاق ^{(کَتھ باتھ)} 07:57, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Stonefire Grill (March 9)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Asilvering was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Stonefire Grill and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Stonefire Grill, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

asilvering (talk) 08:46, 9 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Stonefire Grill[edit]

Hello, Muffin Dragon. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Stonefire Grill, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 09:01, 9 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Stonefire Grill[edit]

Hello, Muffin Dragon. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Stonefire Grill".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 08:24, 9 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unsourced WP:BLP edits to Eric Esrailian after final warning[edit]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 60 hours for violations of Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 16:22, 6 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]