User talk:Mundlapati

Welcome[edit]

Hello, Mundlapati, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and vote pages using three tildes, like this: ~~~. Four tildes (~~~~) produces your name and the current date. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!

National Institute for Smart Government[edit]

You recently tagged this page for speedy deletion, with the reason "Promoting the site.". I just wanted to let you know that I've removed the speedy deletion tag as this is not currently a valid reason for speedy deletion. I have moved the discussion to Articles for deletion and you can place a vote or comment there.

Thanks for your contributions! Stifle 11:59, 5 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Measure (Compassion)[edit]

How to measure [compassion] in a country? unknown 07:38, 16 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly charitable acts as percentage of disposable income (not just donations of money), volunteer hours donated, etc.... These would have to be measured against fully altruistic (ie. tithing) or technically selfish acts (ie. donating to one's own organization) that just seem compassionate. I am unaware of any resources that are currently doing this, but you might want to check out the United Nations. You would probably also have to subtract (or even maybe divide by?) the relative number of anti-compassionate acts (such as expecting or demanding bribes, interfering with journalism, interfering with unharmful free expression, etc...) in those nations. A few organizations do this last, such as: http://www.heritage.org/index/ (Index of Economic Freedom), http://www.rsf.org/rubrique.php3?id_rubrique=573 (Reporters sans frontières) . International human rights watches of various sorts would probably also be up on it. 24.16.251.40 23:52, 31 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Reddit[edit]

A tag has been placed on Reddit requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for web content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the article or have a copy emailed to you. — Dæ dαlus ^Contribs 06:23, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Reddit[edit]

I have nominated Reddit, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Reddit. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. — Dæ dαlus ^Contribs 06:59, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]