User talk:MyNameIsVlad/Archive 1
 | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 | Archive 2 |
Our forum
Welcome to the Romanian Wikipedia notice board! This page is a portal for all Romanian-related topics and a place for Romanian editors to gather and socialize and debate. Discussions are encouraged, in both English and Romanian. Post any inquiry under their relevant cathegory.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Romanian_Wikipedian%27s_notice_board
--Anittas 18:06, 4 December 2005 (UTC)
Arch Linux Background
Here is that background you wanted. Glad I could help. :)
http://art.archlinux.org/main.php?g2_view=core:ShowItem&g2_itemId=74&g2_imageViewsIndex=1
Freyr 21:19, 11 June 2006 (UTC)
Your VandalSniper application
|
Good day, and thank you for applying to use the counter-vandalism tool VandalSniper. I am pleased to inform you that your application has been accepted, and you are now approved to use the tool. You are now welcome to download the program - and be sure to read the features guide, if you have not already done so.
Please bear in mind that VandalSniper is a powerful program, and that misuse may result in your access being withdrawn by a moderator. Don't hesitate to get in touch if you have any questions, and once again welcome to VandalSniper! Kind regards, |
Barnstar
|
The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | |
| For your extensive vandal fighting efforts, I hereby award you this barnstar. --SharkfaceT/C 19:48, 20 April 2008 (UTC) |
Pirating
Dear Aremith, do you think that "pirated" is a legally correct term to be used instead of "illegal copying" or "copyright violation"? Do you really equate those Somalian pirates (who attacked that French yacht) and people who illegally copy windows?
I am sorry, but I cannot agree with you, Cheers, Bakken.
- Pirating, in the modern sense, refers to copyright infringement (See article Software_piracy) Therefore, a person who commits acts of software piracy is called a pirate. So, yes, I feel that "pirated" is the correct term for the act of commiting copyright infringement. Also, when leaving a message, please create a new section, so that it is easier to find the messages. Also, please sign by either clicking the sign button or typing four tildes (~). --Aremith tlk | eml 20:55, 20 April 2008 (UTC)
- well, the article is actually called Copyright infringement of software (which is presumably the correct legal term), it is not called "software pirace" (which is a redirection). And the article says that there is an opposition to using the term "pirate" not for armed murderers but for people who illegally copy software. Why can we not use the correct legal term -- "illegal copying" og "copyright infringement"? --85.81.116.15 (talk) 21:27, 20 April 2008 (UTC)
- and how "in the modern sense" do you call Somalian pirates who have just attacked a Spanish fishing boat [1]? --85.81.116.15 (talk) 21:30, 20 April 2008 (UTC)
- We can use the legal term, "copyright infringement". However, you changed the term "pirated" to "stolen" then to "illegally copied". When referring to software that was obtained through a method of copyright infringement, I believe the term pirated is a tad bit more correct. In this sense, it has nothing to do with historical pirates, it is just a modern term. A word can have more than one definition. Here is the official Oxford dictionary page for the word "pirate" [2]. It shows that the word "pirate" has 3 different definitions, one being "denoting a text, film, recording, etc. that has been reproduced and used for profit without permission". Merriam-Webster has two definitions, at least one referring to copyright infringement: [3]. Also, if you have something to say directly at me, please write it on my talk page. I receive a notification when i receive a new message on my talk page, but I do not watch other talk pages for new comments. Aremith tlk | eml 21:37, 20 April 2008 (UTC)
- Actually it's not "historical" pirates it's modern pirates with assault rifles and grenade launchers. And if you seem to admit that the software thieves have nothing to do with the pirates, why call them the same name? Just because some other people do? That's not a good excuse, I believe! Millions of people call your terrorists "freedom fighters" (and the other way around) but you probably take a side and call them terrorists (or freedom fighters) right? --85.81.116.15 (talk) 07:19, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
- No, it's because every single dictionary in the world has the term pirates referring to pirating as the act of copyright infringement. I gave you links to both the Oxford and Merriam-Webster dictionaries. Those are the two most trusted dictionaries in the world. If they have it, it's a sure sign that it's the correct term. Also, Microsoft uses it in its WGA prompts, so even large corporations use it. I don't care if they're modern or historical pirates. The term "pirate" refers to people who perform acts of copyright infringement. Also, your comparison between pirates and the whole terrorist/freedom fighters thing is seriously flawed. As I've said before major dictionaries have the term pirating defined as copyright infringement. If you don't agree with that, you are free to contact them. Aremith tlk | eml 00:22, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
- "every single dictionary in the world" -- this is certainly not true. For example, 1) Russian "пират" at jandex.ru dictionary; 2) Danish "pirat" at ordbogen.com dictionary; -- both give only one meaning -- sea-robber. You are free to promote Microsoft's views, that's your choice, but please, do not do it in Wikipedia. Wikipedia is supposed to be neutral. Calling illegal copiers "pirates" is not neutral. Again, an argument, that if Microsoft is doing something, than it must be acceptable, is not just flawed, it is completely wrong, as shown by numerous court decisions in different countries. 85.81.116.15 (talk) 18:31, 2 May 2008 (UTC)
Barnstar
|
|
The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | |
|
For beating me to vandalism many times today. ṜέđṃάяķvюĨїήīṣŢ Drop me a line§ 22:37, 20 April 2008 (UTC) |
Your VandalProof Application
Thank you for your interest in VandalProof, Aremith. As you may know, VP is a very powerful program, and in fact the just released 1.3 version has even more power. Because of this we must uphold strict protocols before approving a new applicant. Regretfully, I have chosen to decline your application at this time. Please note it is nothing personal by any means, and we certainly welcome you to apply again soon. Thank again for your interest in VandalProof. βcommand 04:27, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
Meetup
|
Vancouver Meetup Please come to an informal gathering of Vancouver Wikipedians, Monday, May 5 at 6:30 pm. It will be at Benny's Bagels, 2505 West Broadway. We'd love to see you there, and please invite others! Watch the Vancouver Meetup page for details. |
Best, Clayoquot (talk | contribs) 06:52, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
Guess who
Somewhat recently, you glanced over, saw me editing Wikipedia and told me not to vandalize. Little did you know…
thedemonhog has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Cheers, and happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
thank u
hey thanks 4 helping me here. i didnt relly get this place but im starting 2 undertand now. thx :) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Shadow cube (talk • contribs) 00:03, 30 May 2008 (UTC)
Vandalism?
Vandalism? All I said was that Navy meant blue violet. How is that vandalizing? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jgrfanatic (talk • contribs) 00:09, 30 May 2008 (UTC)
- I agree that the two terms share the same word. However, there is a section marked Etymology near the bottom of the article that states what the word "Navy" came from. Your addition did not belong there when there is already a section marked etymology. Also, please sign your comments next time by typing four tildes (~). Thanks. Aremith tlk | eml 00:17, 30 May 2008 (UTC)
Re: Awesome Job!
Cool. Thanks! Gary King (talk) 20:31, 5 June 2008 (UTC)
Welcome to VandalProof!
Thank you for your interest in VandalProof, Aremith! You have now been added to the list of authorized users, so if you haven't already, simply download and install VandalProof from our main page. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me or any other moderator, or you can post a message on the discussion page. Daniel (talk) 06:04, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
thanks!
Thank you Aremith! :) Vishnava talk 03:46, 15 June 2008 (UTC)