User talk:Mystique4788
March 2020[edit]
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Mercy Eke. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Theroadislong (talk) 12:43, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
Important Notice[edit]
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in living or recently deceased people, and edits relating to the subject (living or recently deceased) of such biographical articles. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
Doug Weller talk 14:42, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
Okay then. I’ll go right ahead to edit whilst sticking by the rules Mystique4788 (talk) 16:35, 12 March 2020 (UTC)
May 2020[edit]
Hello, I'm Celestina007. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Mercy Eke have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. Celestina007 (talk) 08:48, 21 May 2020 (UTC)