User talk:N142pb

Userpage[edit]

Hello, I am just dropping by to see how some of the "newbies" I've met at the Teahouse are doing. I see that you are editing and have a really good guide/mentor. Nice. :) If you want your signature to be blue instead of newbie-red, you just write something on your user page and save it, thereby creating it. Here are some tips if you want to put something more on it:

For making your user page look nice, see: Wikipedia:User page design center. You can also "clone/borrow/steal" the code from someone else's user page. Just ensure that you change it enough that it does not look like you are trying to impersonate the other user. Wikipedia:User pages is a good guide as to what kind of things are appropriate in user space. And when you use the work someone else has created, in the edit summary please attribute the work to them by naming the user you copied the content from. If you want to add userboxes you can start here: Wikipedia:Userboxes. There are also many, many customized userboxes floating around on user pages in the Wikipedia, if you find one you fancy just copy the code from the page. If you are further interested in defining yourself and your style there is also the Wikipedia fauna. Happy editing! w.carter-Talk 00:22, 19 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Event Driven Executive has been accepted[edit]

Event Driven Executive, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

j⚛e decker ^talk 16:59, 27 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A request for advice[edit]

[User:MadScientistX11|MadScientistX11] There is probably something in Wiki's Help that would answer my questions but I'm more certain of getting an answer by asking you. The questions are about usage of links to other Wiki articles.

First, my convention has been to put a link on the first occurrence of a term but not on subsequent occurrences. I can imagine that it could sometimes be a convenience if all occurrences had links. Is there a Wiki convention?

Second, some articles only have links on some terms while others seem to have links on everything. For example, in my article I mention San Jose, CA. I could have a link to the Wiki article on San Jose (I assume there is one) but I don't because the location is not an important aspect of my subject. To me, lots of links make an article look confusing and difficult to read but they could be useful to some readers. Chasing down every possible link can add a lot to the workload also. Convention?

I imagine you are going to tell me that it is mostly a matter of judgement, but maybe there are standards.

Cheers,

BobN142pb (talk) 05:47, 2 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

BTW, when contacting someone again it's a good idea to use their user ID. I see you were trying to do that but I think you left off a needed extra bracket. What I usually like to use is this: {{ping|UserName}} which ends up looking like this @N142pb: Sorry, I always end up answering a different question that wasn't even asked. Anyway, regarding the conventions you have it right. There is a convention I'm pretty sure and it's that you link it once, the first time it occurs. But you can definitely violate that if you want and I do once in a while. Actually, someone asked a Teahouse question about that a while back, if you could link both to a term in an info box and also in the article and I said I thought that was fine, in fact it was what I would do. I think this article has the essentials but everything that you described sounded correct: Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style/Linking I especially agree that overlinking, for example making San Jose in the EDX article a link, is a very bad idea. I know people do it but I think it's a sign of an inexperienced editor. --MadScientistX11 (talk) 06:58, 2 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]