User talk:Nabil rais2008/Archive 7

Disambiguation link notification for April 4[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Almas Tower, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Atkins (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject..

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 16:54, 4 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

DAMAC Maison-Paramount Tower 3[edit]

Hello, Nabil rais2008, and thank you for your contributions!

Some text in an article that you worked on DAMAC Maison-Paramount Tower 3, appears to be directly copied from another Wikipedia article, DAMAC Maison-Paramount Tower 1. Please take a minute to double-check that you've properly attributed the source text in your edit summary..

It's entirely possible that this bot made a mistake, so please feel free to remove this notice and the tag it placed on DAMAC Maison-Paramount Tower 3 at any time. MadmanBot (talk) 17:32, 5 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback[edit]

Hello, Nabil rais2008. You have new messages at Talk:Pentominium.
Message added 19:54, 15 April 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Jawadreventon (talk) 19:54, 15 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback[edit]

Hello, Nabil rais2008. You have new messages at Talk:Burj Al Alam.
Message added 21:07, 18 April 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

can you please give me the current status on this tower, too -thank you very much Jawadreventon (talk) 21:07, 18 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 30[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Balochistan Rural Support Programme (BRSP) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added links pointing to Kalat, Bolan and Mastung

List of NGOs in Pakistan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Hyderabad

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:55, 30 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Invitation to WLM![edit]

Wiki Loves Monuments - Pakistan
	Wiki Loves Monuments comes to Pakistan! Hi Nabil rais2008! WLM is the largest international photographic competition in the world and we are looking forward to expanding it to Pakistan this year. We have been planning to make this national competition really take off; but to do so, we need your help! Sign up at Wiki Loves Monuments 2013 in Pakistan and our mailing list if you are interested in being part of the organising team or can help spread the word. We look forward to hearing from you! Official website of WLM Pakistan

You are receiving this message because you are a member of Wikipedia:WikiProject Pakistan. This message was delivered by EdwardsBot (talk) 14:26, 30 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 6[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Balochistan Rural Support Programme, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Donors (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:02, 6 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Help ![edit]

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

I want to edit the info box, how can i edit it ? i want to add more headings in this article's info box; Balochistan Rural Support Programme. Please assist me in this regard.

Nabil rais2008 (talk) 18:04, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You can read the documentation for the template here - Template:Infobox non-profit. That lists all the parameters and how to use them. Charmlet (talk) 18:27, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

JW Marriott Dubai[edit]

Nabil rais2008, I'm not sure why you undid my revision about the JW Marriott Dubai, starting the article by stating that it is now the tallest hotel in the world. It is listed here at Wikipedia as the tallest in the world, and if you Google "tallest hotel in the world" you will find dozens of media articles covering the opening of the hotel and stating it is the world's tallest. Please let me know why you felt the need to change this. It makes no sense to say it's the tallest hotel in Dubai and then leave the fact that it's the tallest in the entire world to the very end of the paragraph. It is the most important fact about the hotel and should be first. Thanks, James Jamesluckard (talk) 11:15, 12 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Dubai World Central Logistics City[edit]

A tag has been placed on Dubai World Central Logistics City requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. [ UseTheCommandLine ~/talk ] # _ 07:55, 7 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Dubai World Central Enterprise Park[edit]

A tag has been placed on Dubai World Central Enterprise Park requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

Speedy deletion nomination of Dubai World Central Commercial City[edit]

A tag has been placed on Dubai World Central Commercial City requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

Speedy deletion nomination of Dubai World Central Residential City[edit]

A tag has been placed on Dubai World Central Residential City requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 08:56, 7 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

BRSP[edit]

Hi, First, thanks for being proactive in engaging with me about this article. My problem with it is that I was unable to establish notability through simple google searches. It may very well be a significant organization, but I was not able to find anything significant about it -- nothing that would, in my view, qualify it as notable under WP:GNG. For instance, this document mentions it only in passing, and that was ranked well below recruiting ads for jobs with the organization. That was actually the first non-PR, non-Wikipedia, non-directory, non-ad mention I saw of the program, and that still does not qualify the organization as notable.

If there are news reports of this organization you are aware of (that are about the organization itself and not about things like kidnappings) I think the article would benefit substantially from their inclusion. Unless I can establish notability myself (in which case I will add the references to the article) or you can provide references that establish WP:N, I intend to nominate the article at AfD. -- [ UseTheCommandLine ~/talk ] # _ 19:19, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I have posted at WP:RSN regarding one of your references, Pakistan Press International. -- [ UseTheCommandLine ~/talk ] # _ 19:31, 8 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I appreciate your offer of additional information. Unfortunately, none of those sources you listed look to me like reliable sources as defined by WP guidelines. Although I understand there may be issues with advertising, advertisements are actually not considered reliable either. Also, if a public profile is seen as a problem, I have to wonder why you are so enthusiastic (judging by what you have written in the article) about having a Wikipedia page? That is quite public. -- [ UseTheCommandLine ~/talk ]# ▄ 08:40, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Balochistan Rural Support Programme for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Balochistan Rural Support Programme is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Balochistan Rural Support Programme until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. [ UseTheCommandLine ~/talk ]# ▄ 10:35, 9 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Dubai Central Library[edit]

A tag has been placed on Dubai Central Library requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

Speedy deletion nomination of Zabeel Mall[edit]

A tag has been placed on Zabeel Mall requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

Nomination of Dubai Central Library for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dubai Central Library is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dubai Central Library until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Nomination of Zabeel Mall for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Zabeel Mall is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zabeel Mall until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Your recent edits regarding articles at WP:Articles for deletion[edit]

Hello. There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. -- [ UseTheCommandLine ~/talk ]# ▄ 10:16, 10 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

WP:CANVASSING[edit]

AS regards your notification of people about the 3 AfDs, stop doing this. You are in violation of the above policy (because you a sending it to editors you feel you will be sympathetic and also you have described the items as "notable"). One of the people you canvassed voted "Keep" in all 3 AfDs in less than a minute, proving they hadn't even read them. If you continue to do this, you will be blocked. I am going to close the AfDs and re-start them, as they are now tainted. Votes from those that you contacted may be discarded by the closing admin. Black Kite (talk) 10:42, 10 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The reason for canvassing is just to broaden the discussion, and inviting more participants and it does not mean to bring the decision to one side. In my point of view by inviting more participants randomly one can easily reach a consensus without any delay, as i did

Nabil rais2008 (talk) 10:53, 10 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

August 2013[edit]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for misusing multiple accounts. It is fairly clear that User:Blog123 which also voted on the AfDs you started is a sock of you, due to its previous name and editing pattern. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. See the block list for more blocks. Black Kite (talk) 11:11, 10 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Unblck[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Nabil rais2008 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have been blocked for one week without giving me a single warning for avoiding those edits, it is not justified in any case that a user is blocked without any warning, i have been blocked in the case of the articles being nominated for deletion, by User: Commandline had wrongly nominated articles of Dubai Central Library, and Zabeel Mall do not fall under section A7. No indication of importance (individuals, animals, organizations, web content, events) of Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. jpgordon^{::==( o )} 15:47, 10 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Nabil rais2008 (talk) 11:26, 10 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nabil, any wrong nomination of article doesn't allow you to do what you did by creating multiple accounts. In fact what you might have skipped there is a warning in the editnotice of every deletion discussion you comment/edit. Besides the Blocking policy allows admins to block users involved in sock puppetry without any prior warning. --SMS ^Talk 11:55, 10 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

But there is always a warning on talk page for user before proceeding to block any user. Yes it was my mistake but is there any way to get unblock before the set expiry date ??? If any then please unblock me so that i can continue my routine editing.

I shall be very thankful to you for your kindness. Thanks Nabil rais2008 (talk) 12:01, 10 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You are quite aware that you are not allowed to use multiple accounts to make multiple votes on discussions. Sock puppetry is treated very seriously at Wikipedia and warnings are not issued for such policy violations. Black Kite (talk) 12:04, 10 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I have not used the account of User: Mohammad adil, it is a coincidence that this user also belongs to Quetta, Pakistan. And he has also interest in bodybuilding, you can have a thorough review in his account for your satisfaction. However other account of User:Blog123 was in my custody but not now, as the account is not being operating by me currently, however one year ago it was created by me, but now its not operating by me. Well, there is at least leniency in Wikipedia for sure to unblock me in two days atleast.

Thanks.

Nabil rais2008 (talk) 12:13, 10 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

How do you know that account is in Quetta, unless it's also you? And is it just a coincidence that you stopped editing for a few minutes while User:Blog123 edited on the AfDs, and then there was another gap in your editing while User:Mohammad adil commented on them? I'll be quite clear about this - the block will stand for at least the time stated. If it turns out that the Mohammad adil accoutn is also you, it will be extended. Please don't take us for fools. This might be good time to list any other accounts that you have used, because misuse like this can often lead to an indefinite block. Black Kite (talk) 14:01, 10 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This is really funny, i came to knew by viewing his profile that he lives in Quetta and nothing else, what is so much suspicious in it ??? It is really weird that you are continuously blaming me, that User:Mohammmad adil is operating by me. It is not the case that if a user lives in Quetta then his ID is operating by me / or belongs to me ! Your blames are senseless.......For your satisfaction you can thoroughly review profile and user log of User:Mohammad Adil, that when , and how he had made edits.

Gap between editing ??? it is natural that users edits at different time of the day, and you are intentionally merging those incidents and blaming me for all that. If i take this case, then i can blame hundreds of users for Sock puppetry !!!

Hope you got my point.

Nabil rais2008 (talk) 15:45, 10 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

No, I was talking about the two five minute gaps in your editing this morning during which - coincidentally - the other two accounts added to the AfDs, and then you carried on editing. Anyway, the SPI will sort this issue out. Black Kite (talk) 15:55, 10 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nabil rais2008 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was blocked due to sock puppetry / multiple accounts, but i future i will refrain from making such things, as they are not against policies of Wikipedia, and i will continue my contributions in Wikipedia as much as possible. From now onwards i will abide by the policies of Wikipedia, and will make productive edits. Hope the administrator understand my reason for appealing the unblock request.Nabil rais2008 (talk) 16:01, 10 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Declining due to the sockpuppetry. You might try WP:OFFER in six months, but there is no promises that you'll be unblocked even if you adhere to the conditions. Bjelleklang - talk 22:21, 17 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for letting me knowing of any other chance of getting unblock from sockpuppetry. I will try to submit my standard offer, and so will refrain from doing this in future.Nabil rais2008 (talk) 08:43, 18 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Any administrator can reply on this unblock request ??? i have again requested for my early unblock, please re-consider my case.Nabil rais2008 (talk) 07:01, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note for reviewing admin: Ongoing SPI has been endorsed and is waiting for CU. Black Kite (talk) 11:11, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Nabil,

I was unaware of your possible connection to other accounts and I am a little disappointed that this incident has blemished a pretty good record of editing skyscraper and Dubai-related articles.

Hopefully, you have learned a useful lesson about how things work and can return soon. In the meantime, can I suggest you serve your one-week block without complaint. Astronaut (talk) 11:50, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Well thanks for your comment. No i don't think that it had blemished my editing on skyscrapers related articles, it was not done intentionally by me but was done by mistake, and i will continue to make productive edits on Wikipedia. Nabil rais2008 (talk) 12:25, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted Edits ![edit]

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, place a new {{help me}} request on this page followed by your questions, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

I have just noticed a remark on top of my edit counter page:

Deleted edits is coming to labs, finally. They should be up by the end of August

What does it mean ?

Nabil rais2008 (talk) 13:22, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Edit Counter and various other tools which used to run on the WP:Toolserver are being moved to WP:Wikimedia Labs. "Deleted edits" is the count of edits made to pages which have since been deleted. Since the Edit Counter moved to Wikimedia Labs, it has not been able to report those, and the notice says that the capability to report them is going to be restored. JohnCD (talk) 13:40, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, its mean that the deleted edits will be added again in total edits. Nabil rais2008 (talk) 13:42, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yes. At the moment, the Edit Counter shows "0" for "Deleted edits", and "Total edits" is the same as "Live edits"; but soon the number of deleted edits will be shown again, and "Total edits" will include them. Meanwhile, you can still see total edits by clicking "Preferences" at the top of the screen. JohnCD (talk) 15:26, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ok thanks for information. Nabil rais2008 (talk) 15:40, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet[edit]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet of Mohammad adil (talk · contribs · global contribs · page moves · user creation · block log) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.
— Berean Hunter (talk) 20:48, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock Appeal[edit]

Nabil rais2008 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I want to appeal my unblock because i have been blocked due to misunderstanding as sock puppetry of User:Mohammad Adil, i admit i have used account of Blog123 for Canvassing, but my account is not a sock puppet of User:Mohammad Adil, previously a lot of confusion has arisen that my location and that of USser:Mohammad Adil are same, (Quetta City), and our interest are also same (As User:Commandline mentioned) i.e bodybuilding, these all similarities are because we both are brothers (You can verify it !), and nothing else, and we are using and sharing the same IP address, you can view his log, and he had greatly contributed to the articles related to Islamic History, and has raised the status of many articles to "Good Article", on the other side my area of editing is totally different as i edit skyscrapers related articles. I * If i was a sock puppet of User: Mohammad Adil, then my account was rather inactive for a number of years (Like blog 123), * It is worth to mention here that by brother(User Mohammad Adil) has almost left editing on Wikipedia due to busy routine work of his job, and i have done a mistake that i had used his ID to canvass. (You can check log i have only done it for once only, but never before). * And yes my brother's account is older than me, he started editing in 2006 and i did in 2009, and it is evident that i am not a sock puppet of him. I really want to solve this issue now, as i am worried about my editing on Wikipedia, you have already blocked the real sock puppet Blog123. But i am not a sock puppet of User:Mohammad Adil, you should re-consider the case, and resolve this confusion. Thanks.Nabil rais2008 (talk) 1:14 am, Yesterday (UTC+4)

Decline reason:

Unpersuasive request. Its wasn't me it was my brother is the oldest excuse in the book and anyway you confirm that you did use his account. Spartaz ^Humbug! 07:49, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Let's review, shall we?

When it is first suggested that you might be a sock of Mohammad Abdil, you denied it, but made no mention of the brother issue. Instead, you said that it is just a coincidence that you both share the same interests, and you are both from Qatar.
You are asked why you know Mohammad Abdil is from Qatar. You are also asked to list any other accounts you have used.
You respond that you learned Mohammad Abdil is from Qatar by reading his user page "and nothing else". You do not list using any other accounts.
A checkuser confirms that you and Mohammad Abdil edit from the same IP, etc.
You then completely change your story. You know say a) you are brothers with Mohammad Abdil (whereas before you said you only know where they are from because of reading their user page), and b) you compromised his account by using it yourself (whereas before you denied that you edited with any other accounts).

Basically, it really doesn't matter anymore. You have repeatedly lied to the community about your use of other accounts, you keep changing your story, the Checkuser data is there, and you have admitted to compromising othe accounts. Whether you are blocked for sockpuppetry or outright disruption, you should remain indeffed blocked. Singularity42 (talk) 20:51, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I apologize for using other accounts for canvassing, but i future i will refrain from making such things, as they are not against policies of Wikipedia, and i will continue my productive contributions to Wikipedia. From now onwards i will abide by the policies of Wikipedia, and will make productive edits. Please consider my apology and some some amendments in my indefinite block, i shall be very thankful to you for your kindness. I assure you that in future i will not try to use any of the accounts (That i have previously used, either for canvassing or for some other purpose. And i will make sure to avoid such activities in future.

However i want to make some one correction from the comments of Singularity42:

We are not from Qatar, but we are from Quetta, Pakistan

Thanks,Nabil rais2008 (talk) 10:58, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Dubai World Central Golf City[edit]

The article Dubai World Central Golf City has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

no indication of notability. no obvious RS refs on google, google news, etc

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. [ UseTheCommandLine ~/talk ]# ▄ 08:06, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Can i ask you to please hold the deletion process as i am currently blocked from editing ? once i am back i can provide you reliable sources for the above mention article. Thanks.Nabil rais2008 (talk) 11:01, 14 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Dubai World Central Aviation City[edit]

The article Dubai World Central Aviation City has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

references outdated. no obvious RS refs/updates on google, google news, etc

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Proposed deletion of Dubai World Central Residential City[edit]

The article Dubai World Central Residential City has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

single reference does not appear to establish notability. unable to find other RS via the usual suspects (google, gnews).

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Help[edit]

Please help me, i want to use WP:OFFER, please advice me to which administrator or experienced editor shall i submit my Standard offer as per WP:OFFER.

Nabil rais2008 (talk) 08:41, 18 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

WP:OFFER is quite simple. Adhere to the three conditions listed, and simply stay away from Wikipedia for at least six months, then make a new unblock request. Keep in mind that this doesn't just apply to this account, it applies to you as a person. Also remember that the offer isn't a promise that you'll be unblocked, it's still up to the reviewing admin to decide. Bjelleklang - talk 08:50, 18 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Balochistan Rural Support Programme for deletion[edit]

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Balochistan Rural Support Programme (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Nomination of Remraam for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Remraam is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Remraam until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Nomination of Flamingo creek for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Flamingo creek is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted..

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Flamingo creek until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Nomination of Falcon Island, Dubai for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Falcon Island, Dubai is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Falcon Island, Dubai until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Administrator's Noticeboard discussion notification[edit]

Speedy deletion nomination of Arjan Dubai[edit]

A tag has been placed on Arjan Dubai, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

Can you please mention these recently nominated articles on Wiki Project Dubai / or other related pages for discussion and to bring more clear consensus ??? I have previously asked you to please consider holding your continuous tagging articles for deletion as i am unable to contribute (Do not take it in the sense that i will again start canvassing !) but i have not received any response from your side.

I do not think that its appropriate practice to tag loads of articles in Wikipedia for deletion, you should have a thorough review of the subject of article and have a detailed search on Google and then tag them for deletion. In my opinion this is not a solution to tag all the un sourced articles / articles lacking reliable references for deletion, rather you can contribute by adding / improving sources in articles by your self, which will result in improving the articles in Wikipedia and will at least show your productivity in Wikipedia as an active contributor rather an active "Articles Deletion Tagger".

Hope you understand.....Thanks for your understanding. Nabil rais2008 (talk) 18:08, 24 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You have recently nominated "Ahmed Abdul Rahim Al Attar Tower" for deletion can i ask you how you have tagged this article for deletion ?? It is to bring in your kind information that this skyscraper this tower is 342 meters high (Considered as a supertall skyscraper as per CTBUH), and is one of the tallest residential building in Dubai. Is it not notable ?? So far i have failed to understand your self assumed criteria of notability, correct me if i am wrong. The article is well sourced (Emporis and CTBUH), and many other references can be added for general notability please read Criteria for Speedy Deletion before tagging articles for deletion.

Thanks for your understanding. Nabil rais2008 (talk) 18:14, 25 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Dubai Promenade for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dubai Promenade is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dubai Promenade until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Speedy deletion nomination of Downtown Jebel Ali[edit]

A tag has been placed on Downtown Jebel Ali, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

Speedy deletion nomination of Jumeirah Park[edit]

A tag has been placed on Jumeirah Park, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

Speedy deletion nomination of Legends of Dubailand[edit]

A tag has been placed on Legends of Dubailand, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

Proposed deletion of Dubai Exhibition City[edit]

The article Dubai Exhibition City has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

no indication of notability, outdated WP:CRYSTAL

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Block shortened to 3 months[edit]

Cross-posted from WT:BASC:

On account of his honest and forthcoming appeal, the Ban Appeals Subcommittee has decided to reduce the length of Nabil rais2008 (talk · contribs)'s block from indefinite to 3 months. This decision is made without prejudice to the appellant being re-blocked for further sockpuppetry or for other disruptive edits. For the Ban Appeals Subcommittee, AGK [•] 20:57, 8 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

For the Ban Appeals Subcommittee, AGK [•] 20:57, 8 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for reducing my indefinite block i am greatly thankful "Ban Appeals Subcommittee" for this decision. In future i will not use any sock account for canvassing, and i have learn a lesson and will refrain from doing this in future.

Hope i make my come back on Wikipedia on November 17, 2013 as a productive and an active editor.

Nabil rais2008 (talk) 16:34, 9 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Pakistan User Group[edit]

Wikimedia Community User Group Pakistan
	Hi Nabil rais2008! We are currently in the process of establishing a User Group for Pakistani Wikimedians with the following objectives; act as a hub for Pakistani editors working across the Wikimedia projects, act as a voice and representative for the Pakistani Wikimedian community, organize meet-ups, establish a Wikimedia Pakistan Chapter, acquire funding for various on-wiki and off-wiki activities including photo competitions, workshops and other public outreach events, and collaborate with the wider Wikimedia community. As an approved User Group, we will be recognised by the Wikimedia Foundation and officially supported by the Wikimedia movement. If you reside in Pakistan or actively work on Pakistan-related topics and can help in functional activities of the Pakistani User Group, please join the official planning group mailing list. For more details about the proposed user group, please visit the official page at http://pk.wikimedia.org. Together we can promote free knowledge in Pakistan!

Wikimedia Community User Group Pakistan

Hi Nabil rais2008!

We are currently in the process of establishing a User Group for Pakistani Wikimedians with the following objectives;

act as a hub for Pakistani editors working across the Wikimedia projects,
act as a voice and representative for the Pakistani Wikimedian community,
organize meet-ups,
establish a Wikimedia Pakistan Chapter,
acquire funding for various on-wiki and off-wiki activities including photo competitions, workshops and other public outreach events, and
collaborate with the wider Wikimedia community.

As an approved User Group, we will be recognised by the Wikimedia Foundation and officially supported by the Wikimedia movement.

If you reside in Pakistan or actively work on Pakistan-related topics and can help in functional activities of the Pakistani User Group, please join the official planning group mailing list. For more details about the proposed user group, please visit the official page at http://pk.wikimedia.org.

Together we can promote free knowledge in Pakistan!

You are receiving this message because you are a member of Wikipedia:WikiProject Pakistan. This message was delivered by EdwardsBot (talk) 17:16, 8 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Block shortened to 3- Months through Ban Appeals Subcommittee[edit]

My block was shortened to 3-months when i appealed for unblock. My block was set to expire on November 17, 2013 @ 20:53 but as of now i am not been unblocked. Currently time here in Pakistan is 21:04.

Please help me out.

Nabil rais2008 (talk) 16:04, 17 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The block will expire today at 22:53 UTC. That is early morning tomorrow (03:50 AM) in Pakistan. Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 16:26, 17 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ok thanks.Nabil rais2008 (talk) 19:07, 17 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of "Block / Sock Puppetry Notice from Use Page"[edit]

I got unblocked recently, as my blocked period expired today. Can i remove the notice of Block / Sock Puppetry Notice from my User page ? or any Administrator will remove it ? It should be removed as i am no longer a sock puppet.

Nabil rais2008 (talk) 15:10, 18 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Now that you're unblocked, you're allowed to remove it, though it's recommended that you archive them rather than removing them outright. Jackmcbarn (talk) 15:28, 18 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, can i archive my user page i thin i can't because the message is displayed on my user page not Talk page. Nabil rais2008 (talk) 15:30, 18 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You can just remove that one. Jackmcbarn (talk) 15:37, 18 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks.Nabil rais2008 (talk) 15:47, 18 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 4[edit]

DAMAC Maison-Paramount Tower 3[edit]

Talkback[edit]

Talkback[edit]

Disambiguation link notification for May 30[edit]

Invitation to WLM![edit]

Disambiguation link notification for June 6[edit]

Help ![edit]

JW Marriott Dubai[edit]

See also[edit]

Speedy deletion nomination of Dubai World Central Logistics City[edit]

Speedy deletion nomination of Dubai World Central Enterprise Park[edit]

Speedy deletion nomination of Dubai World Central Commercial City[edit]

Speedy deletion nomination of Dubai World Central Residential City[edit]

BRSP[edit]

Nomination of Balochistan Rural Support Programme for deletion[edit]

Speedy deletion nomination of Dubai Central Library[edit]

Speedy deletion nomination of Zabeel Mall[edit]

Nomination of Dubai Central Library for deletion[edit]

Nomination of Zabeel Mall for deletion[edit]

Your recent edits regarding articles at WP:Articles for deletion[edit]

WP:CANVASSING[edit]

August 2013[edit]

Unblck[edit]

Deleted Edits ![edit]

Blocked as a sockpuppet[edit]

Unblock Appeal[edit]

Proposed deletion of Dubai World Central Golf City[edit]

Proposed deletion of Dubai World Central Aviation City[edit]

Proposed deletion of Dubai World Central Residential City[edit]

Help[edit]

Nomination of Balochistan Rural Support Programme for deletion[edit]

Nomination of Remraam for deletion[edit]

Nomination of Flamingo creek for deletion[edit]

Nomination of Falcon Island, Dubai for deletion[edit]

Administrator's Noticeboard discussion notification[edit]

Speedy deletion nomination of Arjan Dubai[edit]

Nomination of Dubai Promenade for deletion[edit]

Speedy deletion nomination of Downtown Jebel Ali[edit]

Speedy deletion nomination of Jumeirah Park[edit]

Speedy deletion nomination of Legends of Dubailand[edit]

Proposed deletion of Dubai Exhibition City[edit]

Block shortened to 3 months[edit]

Pakistan User Group[edit]

Block shortened to 3- Months through Ban Appeals Subcommittee[edit]

Removal of "Block / Sock Puppetry Notice from Use Page"[edit]