User talk:Name-o

Welcome![edit]

Hello, Name-o, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! — Jeff G. ツ 19:03, 14 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Atlantic Giant[edit]

Since your prior edits are of primary concern towards the possibility of renaming, and redirecting Atlantic Giant, can you please refrain from further edits to that article and take any concerns you have to the talk page regarding the renaming of the article. In fact I would be creating Giant pumpkin and redirecting Atlantic Giant today except for your current edits; I would like to know what you have against either Atlantic Giant or Giant pumpkin that has led to the exclusive focus of the article as the renaming would remove Atlantic Giant as an independent article making it redirect to Giant pumpkin as the common usage of Atlantic Giant is of Giant pumpkin, rather than leaving an article focusing on the legalese of the naming rights. Your edits suggest an objection to that and a desire to split instead; but without reasoning and further discussion I don't see any justification for that; of course I don't see the justification for your prior edits either and would like you to explain them on the Atlantic Giant talk page as well. Thanks. Falconjh (talk) 13:44, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Giant Pumpkin (September 22)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sulfurboy was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability—see the general guideline on notability and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia.
What you can do: Add citations (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners) to secondary reliable sources that are entirely independent of the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Giant Pumpkin and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sulfurboy (talk) 16:44, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Name-o, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Sulfurboy (talk) 16:44, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Giant Pumpkin concern[edit]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Giant Pumpkin, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:39, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Giant Pumpkin[edit]

Hello, Name-o. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Giant Pumpkin".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:29, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Maze[edit]

I revered your changes to the maze page because Instagram is not a valid source and the information on that page was incorrect also. Hardyplants (talk) 09:05, 29 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]