User talk:Narsk

Nomination of Curtis J. Jones Jr. for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Curtis J. Jones Jr. is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Curtis J. Jones Jr. (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Woinfosd (talk) 17:48, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

oh ok sockpuppet Narsk (talk) 19:07, 15 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Curtis Jones[edit]

The fact that you accumulated enough edits to create pages yourself after working on a draft and submitting it to the AFC queue still does not give you the right to just pull it out of the AFC queue and move it yourself — once you have placed it in the AFC queue, it has to move through the AFC process properly regardless of what other privileges you've gained since submitting it. It takes just ten edits to gain page creation status, and any editor (even a bad faith one) can achieve that that in less than one minute — so if graduating to page-creation abilities meant you were suddenly allowed to pull your own prior work back out of the AFC review queue and just move it yourself, that would completely defeat the entire purpose of AFC even existing at all. Nobody would ever actually have to leave their drafts in the review queue anymore, if all they had to do was make ten random mainspace edits and then immediately come back and move their draft themselves. Bearcat (talk) 21:05, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Trust that I didn't do any of what you're talking about here maliciously. I figured if I was not prevented from creating pages I could create pages. It's a confusing and discouraging process for a relatively new user just trying to contribute. thanks Narsk (talk) 21:35, 14 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Katherine Gilmore Richardson for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Katherine Gilmore Richardson is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Katherine Gilmore Richardson until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Mccapra (talk) 19:36, 22 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Curtis J. Jones Jr. has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Curtis J. Jones Jr.. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 18:27, 3 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Curtis J. Jones Jr. (June 3)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Curtis J. Jones Jr. instead.

The comment the reviewer left was:

There is a long and complex history with this person. If the article is kept, this draft can be merged into the article.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Curtis J. Jones Jr. and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Curtis J. Jones Jr., click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 18:30, 3 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Narsk! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 18:30, 3 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Curtis J. Jones Jr.[edit]

Hello, Narsk. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Curtis J. Jones Jr., a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:03, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:54, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Curtis J. Jones Jr.[edit]

Hello, Narsk. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Curtis J. Jones Jr.".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:43, 3 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:34, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]