User talk:Natalieben

Welcome!

Hello, Natalieben, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Mak (talk) 00:08, 1 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for joining WP:WMNHIST![edit]

Thanks for expressing your support for WikiProject Women's History and joining the project. Please take a look at our how you can help list and jump in anywhere that interests you. If there's anything we can do to help you get started editing, please ask on the talk page. ---Shane Landrum (cliotropic | talk | contribs) 20:52, 13 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Women's History[edit]

WikiProject Women's History needs members' input on implementing auto-assessment. You'll find the discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Women's History#Auto-assessment. Best wishes, Voceditenore (talk) 11:07, 5 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Members' input needed at WikiProject Women's History[edit]

Hello. I'm writing to you as your name is listed on the members page for WikiProject Women's History. In recent discussions at the project, most notably here, several members have indicated that the scope of the project may need to be more clearly defined and communicated. I have set up a workshop page for this, but it obviously needs as wide a participation as possible to achieve genuine consensus and to allow the project to move forward. You'll find the workshop here.

If you no longer consider yourself an active member of the project, it would help if you could indicate this on the members' page. This will allow us to better gauge how much people-power we actually have. Best wishes, Voceditenore (talk) 18:39, 24 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Women's History Project – Final call for comments on the Scope draft[edit]

Our workshop on revising and clarifying the scope of our project has produced a draft outlining our project's scope and criteria for article inclusion. Please join us at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Women's History/Scope workshop#Scope draft to discuss this document. There's a separate section beneath it for final comments, which will remain open through Tuesday, June 14th. As Cynwolfe says "with good participation, we should be able to revise our project page soon, clearing up the issues we've been dealing with and preparing us to go on to the fun stuff." Best wishes, Voceditenore (talk) 12:45, 10 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:P1guardianweekly22042011.pdf[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:P1guardianweekly22042011.pdf, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Deadstar (talk) 14:16, 17 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Erminethrudis[edit]

The article Erminethrudis has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

There appears to be nothing notable about this woman. Her name only survives because her will survives.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. PepperBeast (talk) 20:29, 12 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Erminethrudis for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Erminethrudis is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Erminethrudis until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

PepperBeast (talk) 16:12, 15 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]