This talk page is archived every month (if I remember). The older pages are indexed at User talk:NawlinWiki/Archives.

Wondering why your article was speedily deleted? Check this list first.

Please add all comments at the bottom of the page (or I may not be able to find them).

_________

Incorrectly edited Fibromyalgia page without citations. Citations follow.

Multiple chemical sensitivity.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Multiple_chemical_sensitivity
Physiological causes

One of the first studies on MCS focused on possible long-term potentiation in the hippocampus and neural sensitization as a central mechanism.[27] Later studies examined the role of the inflammatory process and found that brain inflammation was correlated with symptoms of MCS.[27] In 1999, Meggs proposed that MCS is caused by low molecular weight chemicals that bind to chemoreceptors on sensory nerve C-fibers leading to the release of inflammatory mediators.[28] McKeown-Eyssen showed that polymorphisms in the CYP2D6 allele was responsible for variation in toxicant metabolism pathways that may cause differences in susceptibility to MCS. [29] Pall identified evidence suggesting elevated nitric oxide and peroxynitrite (NO/ONOO-) as the etiology for MCS and several related conditions including fibromyalgia....

MCS CONFERENCE, LONDON, 2&3 September 2003 as reported by Dr. Dick van Steenis MBBS. http://209.85.173.104/search?q=cache:UmV9wq3GYkAJ:www.elc.org.uk/papers/2003vanSteenis.doc+Industrial+pollution+fibromyalgia&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=7&gl=us

The toll of industrial pollution has amounted to some 140000 unnecessary deaths annually plus illnesses comprising as much as 40% of the "NHS bill. Wasting almost 20% of the NHS budget on “managers" has not cured the causes. The range of immune system malfunction related diseases includes autism, ME, SLE, multiple chemical sensitivity, multiple sclerosis, chronic fatigue syndrome, gulf war syndrome, celiac disease, polymyalgia rheumatica & fibromyalgia. 70.137.146.100 17:16, 1 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Article "Future Pilot" speedily deleted for failure to assert significance. Future Pilot article should be retained because of WP:MUSIC, Criteria for Musicians and Ensembles, part 9: "Has won or placed in a major music competition." The New Mexico music awards is a major music competition, and Future Pilot indeed placed in this competition. I believe I stated this clearly in my article. Please reconsider your deletion. Thank you. ~~

An editor has asked for a deletion review of Major_Stars. Since you closed the deletion discussion for this article or speedy-deleted it, you might want to participate in the deletion review.

An editor has asked for a deletion review of Future Pilot. Since you closed the deletion discussion for this article or speedy-deleted it, you might want to participate in the deletion review. I accept. Let us begin. Dusty42682 03:53, 2 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Jerk Out Month[edit]

Judging by the angry posts that are left on your talk page, I can only assume you are an admin on Wikipedia who is not here to better it, but to thrust your own opinions about what is a good wikipedia article down peoples throats. I am sorry you are in a position of power on this site and would like to meet you in person to give you a piece of my mind. I however, do believe in being civil on Wikipedia, so I will issue some explanations with a cool tone.

Firstly, I would like to point out your reason for deletion of Jerk Out Month is that it is Inappropriate. It is arguable that the content which talks about Masturbation is inappropriate, but even as an Admin, I don't think that is up to you to decide. It should be decided by the Wiki Community.
Secondly, I also know there were no references in the article, but you did give me or anyone else enough time to add any.
Thirdly, if you had take the time, you could have looked on the link and saw for yourself that there is indeed a website: http://www.jerkoutmonth.blogspot.com
And Fourth, I find it absolutely ridiculous you would ban me from editing wikipedia for reposting Jerk Out Month after all the things I have contributed.

Sincerely Angered, (Yohowithrum (talk) 23:28, 17 December 2007 (UTC))[reply]

Minor Pixar Fun[edit]

Would you mind watching the Pixar and Red's Dream pages with us for a little bit? We've been noticing at least one user (Special:Contributions/71.67.123.130) has been repeatedly adding speculative info about the Wall-E DVD release -- not scheduled to be out for a year, I'm sure -- after the text gets reverted out. Not a big deal in the big picture of WP content, but they seem to be rather persistent. I did post a message on their talk page asking for a citation, but it seems to have been ignored. thankyouverymuch. SpikeJones 14:38, 2 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

stop deleting artical Nv-20012[edit]

It is a good artical full of information, if think that is not so than make the artical a stub, DO NOT delete it Nv-20012 18:01, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the Info.[edit]

I have read the guidelines more closely and understand your (Wikipedia's) position on the matter. Please understand my intent was not to spam, but to add links that were relevant to the article.

It is interesting, however, to see that many articles have external links that do not meet the guidelines. These led me to believe that adding such links is appropriate. How does Wikipedia reconcile such inconsistency? —Preceding unsigned comment added by GaryKeorkunian (talk • contribs) 17:30, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

My deleted page[edit]

Hello, i would like to know why my page about the band pride of 69 was deleted. i believe that it fits the criteria needed and that the page was significant as they have recently been signed —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jameslewisgd (talk • contribs) 17:52, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Droolcore[edit]

This is really a growing genre of music, becoming fairly well known throughout Virginia, and deserves it's own article, because it means a lot to the people it involves, and should be known by everyone.

Give me chance!!![edit]

Hi you deleted my page "Backbeat Beatles" within minutes of me creating it - I was looking up references and articles in newspapers to backup their inclusion, but when I went back to add them in, it was gone. Please can you re-instate it so I can at least have a small chance at getting it right before it's deleted again. I'm pretty annoyed about this, as I just wasted 30 minutes of my life on this, only for you to arbitrarily wipe it out without even giving me any chance to respond - shouldn't there be at least some semblance of fairness in giving contributors at least a few hours to respond to your personal decision to delete something before you go ahead with it?? It doesn't really seem like good practice for editors to be able to do this so quickly and seemingly vindictively. Rob. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rob hirst (talk • contribs) 15:24, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

tribute bands inclusion[edit]

(See Above) Also, having had a good look through the page on tribute acts the reasons given for deletion of my page should apply equally to about 70% of the other bands listed on there. Please can you also delete all those pages for the sake of fairness? Thanks. Rob hirst 15:49, 4 December 2007 (UTC) Rob.[reply]

Amesoeurs article detetion[edit]

I would just like to protest the deletion of the (unfinished) article on Amesoeurs. Following this through to its logical conclusion would mean the deletion of articles on Alcest and Peste Noire among others, being bands of the same standing which share members etc.

Would you care to comment?

Euamo 20:30, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

ListenUp speedy deletion[edit]

I get that you thought the first two were spam. But how is the last paragraph that I posted spam? It had facts about the business. How am I suppose to write on this subject ? There is my paragraph below. I am new to Wikipedia (obviously) and it seems like there has been some kind of secret science to posting that admins don't wnat to tell to new users. An encyclopedia article is factual and there are many on companies. This is the article I'd like to write on please explain what the best way to go about doing it is without being spam.

Also, I understand this might not be long enough to be an article. Can it be a stub?

Listen Up is a privately owned retail corporation founded by Steven Weiner and Walton Stinson. Its doors opened on October 10, 1972 in Denver, Colorado. The high end audio/video retailer remains open for business in the exact location it first opened its doors at 680 S. Pearl S. The specialty retailer has grown from one retail store front to three, adding Boulder in 1980 and Colorado Springs in 1989. Adjacent to the Denver store exists an additional commercial retail store and an independent repair shop all acting as subsidiaries to the corporate office now located on E. Evans in Denver.

So why wouldn't you indicate that instead of deleting it and then threatening me. I am happy to meet wikipedia's criteria, but I've found no where that describes the basic criteria yet. I've found out by clicking on link after link after link and there has yet to be a direct -do this- from wikipedia. I have several third party sources talking about ListenUp. Most are magazines, but I also have a book referencing them. They're articles not written by ListenUp. And so I will try again to write the article, but I'll have to do some more research on exactly how to quote and reference them. I'm telling you this so you don't get frustrated and block me. If you have any articles I should use as an example that would be great. I'll look for some how to pages on wikipedia to guide me too. —Preceding unsigned comment added by AdrienneAA (talk • contribs) 21:25, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ekotren[edit]

Hello, the second version that you deleted said they are currently on a national tour as also mentioend on the talk page. Wouldn't that count as claim of importance? --Tikiwont (talk) 16:33, 5 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't want to imply that you're overreacting, but just that I saw some improvements over the first version that i deleted myself even though it is indeed unclear if it would survive an AfD. As I have to leave now, I merely just referred the creator here.--Tikiwont (talk) 16:46, 5 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

HOW DARE YOU![edit]

THE MRS BONNYMAN SONG IS NOT NONSENSE! IT IS WELL ON ITS WAY TO ENTERING THE UK SINGLES CHART NEXT OCTOBER! YOU OBVIOUSLY DO NOT KNOW WHAT YOU ARE TALKING ABOUT YOU SILLY FOOL, AND I WILL ISSUE A FORMAL COMPLAINT ABOUT THE DELETION OF THE ARTICLE! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Innes2k7 (talk • contribs) 17:52, 5 December 2007 (UTC) I DON'T THINK I SHOULD BOTHER! WIKIPEDIA IS A TERRIBLE WEBSITE..HALF OF THE THINGS WRITTEN ON IT ARE A LOT OF RUBBISH - AND YOU HAVE THE CHEEK TO ACCUSE THE MRS BONNYMAN SONG OF BEING RUBBISH! WHO ARE YOU ANYWAY? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Innes2k7 (talk • contribs) 17:55, 5 December 2007 (UTC) AW MAN THAT IS REALLY UNFAIR! MRS BONNYMAN SONG IS AMAZING.. PLEASE UN-DELETE IT![reply]

This less than charming user has announced his intention to depart on my talk page (LOL I AM LEAVING THIS SHITEHOLE OF A WEBSITE ANYWAY! WHAT A HEAP OF CRAP..AND A WASTE OF TIME AND SPACE!!!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Innes2k7 (talk • contribs) 20:44, 5 December 2007 (UTC)). I expect I received this notification because I reverted his vandalism to your user page. I bet it would be hard to tell which one of us is more pleased that he's removed himself. And if he returns, I'll be keeping an eye on him as, no doubt, will you. Cheers. Accounting4Taste:talk 20:55, 5 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism on my talk page[edit]

Thank you :) — Nova Dog — (contribs) 22:39, 5 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Reverting Vandalism on my Talk Page[edit]

Thanks!

Here is an award to say thanks!

		The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		I award you this barnstar User:NawlinWiki for reverting vandalism on my talk page. Keep up the Good Work The Helpful One ^(Talk)^{(Contributions)} 22:42, 5 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That was odd. Thanks. —Disavian (^talk/_contribs) 23:03, 5 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks[edit]

Someone vandalized my Userspace! But a little angel came along and fixed it! Thank you! -- L A X 23:03, 5 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks![edit]

Thank you for the revert on my userpage. I have no idea who that user is, but since it was a brand new account, I assume it was someone I chastised recently for vandalism. Well, now you've got rid of them, so I suppose I needn't worry. At any rate, thanks. Cheers! ---RepublicanJacobite_{The'FortyFive'} 23:45, 5 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

James Galus[edit]

I'm sorry. The only credible source I have for James' description is the inside cover of my Mindless Self Indulgence cd. I can look for others, but for now that's all I have. —Preceding unsigned comment added by ..zammechat (talk • contribs) 03:54, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect of Van zandt milmore[edit]

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Van zandt milmore, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Van zandt milmore is a redirect to a non-existent page (CSD R1).

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Van zandt milmore, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 08:36, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

HI this is bilbo987654321 u delted my italians page well an anthropolgist told me that some italians have been known to have an extra muscle in there leg like african that helps with short distance running maybe i put it in the wrong spot but it was true —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bilbo987654321 (talk • contribs) 15:23, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Nawlin Wiki, i had put a hangon on Newgen Softwaes Technologies page. plz let me know why did you delete it ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Miteshmanani (talk • contribs) 14:36, December 6, 2007 thanks for the prompt response. hey can you create that page for me ?? i can provide you with all the information that i have about the organization.

Miteshmanani (talk) 19:45, 6 December 2007 (UTC)Miteshmanani[reply]

Joshua James William Holmes[edit]

Kill it anyway! :P - CobaltBlueTony™ _talk 20:19, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

ANGRY WIKIPEDIAN[edit]

ALRIGHT POOKIE, THAT IS BAD FAITH! UM, YOU DID DELETE THIS PAGE FOR PURE ENJOYMENT! HENCE THE SILLY FACE AFTER YOUR "KILL IT ANYWAY REMARK" YOU BOTH NEED TO GET REAL JOBS AND GIVE UP YOUR ADMINISTRATOR KEY BOARDS! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.34.167.194 (talk) 20:40, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Rockefeller Group Business Centers[edit]

Can you explain to me why my page has been deleted and locked? What can I do to get this page reactivated? david@rgbc.com —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dejdej1 (talk • contribs) 20:35, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sock?[edit]

I think Monty1411 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) might be a sock of recently blocked Kris1411 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log), both edited "Matthew Sinclair"-related articles. FYI.--12 Noon 20:32, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Filmcow[edit]

Why did you delete this? I was merely creating a wiki page for the producer of several high grade movies, I don't want to advertise him, but people have been giving the credit to others who merely copied his movies.

Also, people have been trying to make this article FOREVER. It's about time we let ONE be established and end the admin's job of cleaning it up!

I demand that the delete be undone, mostly on the grounds that it WAS a legit wiki page as well as carrying an unbiased and neutral view. Also, NONE of your criteria for deletion were honored on this page. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Livebrick (talk • contribs) 21:03, 6 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Cass Dillon[edit]

Can we not pull the trigger on deletions so quickly? Within 6 minutes of creating Cass Dillon someone put up the speedy deletion tag, and before I can put up the hang on tag to re-iterate I was gathering sources, it was gone. I clearly stated when I created the page that, I was "creating page, sources to follow shortly." I don't get it. Angrymansr (talk) 17:48, 7 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It was a work in progress, as is everything else on this site. How can an article be fully developed in in the first half hour of its existence? This is why people hate contributing wikipedia. Between vandals and overzealous admins, no work actually gets done. Angrymansr (talk) 18:21, 7 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Chucky Styles article[edit]

Why was my page deleted?? chucky styles is a musical artist that is featured on many albums that are articles here on wikipedia. im just not done fully editing his page. please let me know. Jride247 (talk) 03:05, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

RE: article[edit]

do u mean like references?? i wasnt done editing the article so thats why i was wondering why it was deleted. and i was going to get some people to help me out on it. but yes, i will fix whatever —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jride247 (talk • contribs) 03:22, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

srh article[edit]

i was still in the process of fixing up that article. SRH is a very huge company and has released mixtapes with suburban noize records. its very notable. can u start putting them up for speedy deletion instead of straight deleting them??? please —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jride247 (talk • contribs) 03:28, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

thank u[edit]

ill just edit the chucky styles and SRH articles in my user talk page until they get done and then ill publish them to the main page. thanks 4 helping me. Jride247 (talk) 03:38, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of Orad Hi Tec page[edit]

Hi, this is my first time adding a page and it was deleted (I didn't know that i had something sent to my message page so i missed your message that my page was deleted). I want to change the content of the page so that it is ok. how can i do this? please advise. Daliah 10 Dec2007 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Daliahn (talk • contribs) 09:22, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of Dimension Zero (US Band)[edit]

I am wondering why you deleted "Dimension Zero (US Band)" ? Dimension Zero's largest achievement has been a remix on "Revolverlution" by the multi-platinum Public Enemy. They have also had nationwide public radio rotation for "Live In Excess" and have had 14,000 downloads in one week getting the first #1 on CNET. This should meet the criteria for notable.

Dimensionzero (talk) 22:50, 10 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of Wading River Motel Article[edit]

This is a historical landmark (officially, being that it was built over 50 years ago)business in the town of Riverhead, which is what qualifies it for an article. You could not possibly know this, being from New Orleans, but that's what we're all here for - to educate eachother. The official website is http://www.wadingrivermotel.net if you care to visit. I can also reproduce historical evidence (thankfully not web based, so it's reliable) that I would be willing to bring online to support this article. Please re-post the article or respond with more reasons as to why this does not qualify its publishing.

SentraSR20 (talk) 11:05, 11 December 2007 (EST)

More Eden Montana stuff[edit]

There's more Eden Montana nonsense with the characteristic "2008-Present" timescale. New_Tides_In_(TV_series) and New_Tides_In_(TV_show), created by EKAK and edited by 121.209.208.4 - Thanks, Ttwaring (talk) 20:01, 11 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of Steve Parish[edit]

Steve Parish is widely regarded as the pioneer of Australian nature cna culture photography publishing, a multi award winning photographer and renowned Australian both in Aus and internationally.

I strongly protest the deletion of the page about him. Your reason for doing so were insufficiant given a simple Google search could have proved the validity of having him on Wikipedia. I will put up a new page and this time, leave it alone perhaps. Tirant! Canberra photographer (talk) 15:28, 12 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Stop Deleting the Tigernet Lounge Article[edit]

in an effert to try and save my work with a fickle internet connection, I am saving and coming back to edit the article. stop being so trigger happy. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Willki (talk • contribs) 19:34, 12 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your help[edit]

Thank you for the revert on my userpage. Well spotted!David(Talk • Contribs) 20:45, 12 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

How do i createa new page?[edit]

I want to create a new page but it wont allow me to. I also kept getting speedy deletions. why? —Preceding unsigned comment added by AV Brady (talk • contribs) 10:15, 13 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Lost in translation or almost[edit]

Hi, I definetly need your help. Could you tell me how finding an English speaking user with an intermediate or advanced level in French, please. because I'm looking for an information that I can't formulate correctly. By the way, I'm sorry for my English, I used to speak English with an advanced level but i didn't practice for somes years... Louxema (talk) 16:54, 13 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for having answered so quickly. And even with an elementary french level maybe.. so I'm looking for un bandeau wikipédia du style de ma page française (in French in the text-lol) fr:Utilisateur:Mythe. Do you see what I mean ? Louxema (talk) 17:01, 13 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That's it - sorry for disturbing you again - how making it in English ? Louxema (talk) 17:14, 13 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Don't worry, I'm looking for it at the same time ;-) Louxema (talk) 17:25, 13 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You're very nice (I'd have said cool in French), that's ok. Thanks a lot for helping me. see you. Louxema (talk) 17:28, 13 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Last, request : could you tell me if all is correct in my "English" ? Louxema (talk) 18:05, 13 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much for helping me so much, and I change my level in English (it is not so good - but it was nice to tell it was). Nice to Wiki-meet you. Louxema (talk) 18:21, 13 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

CSD question[edit]

Hi Nawlin, I see your name a lot when it comes to speedy deletions. With Category:Images on Wikimedia Commons, it says you should delete images if "The file names are the same (if not remember to redirect all image links)". I don't get what that means. If you could help out, that'd be great. That category is always backlogged, so I'd like to help out there. Spellcast (talk) 05:41, 14 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Nsgaeverine Posts another 'empty stub'[edit]

This person continues to post empty stubs on TV journalists there is another called Keith Edwards http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Keith_Edwards_%28news_anchor%29&action=history It should also be deleted and this person should be banned. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.93.44.78 (talk) 12:46, 14 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Not so fast[edit]

Yes, I do admit to a few empty of the Indianapolis TV journalists articles--I take full responsible for that. However, the only reason I did the TV journalists articles were because I had made a sports-related wager on a news discussion site, and I apparently should not have been banned from editing the TV journalists articles. I have already stopped myself before this came along.

I run a television news discussion site and I figured if some Indiana TV journalists were created, it would draw more attention to my site. I will accept a one year ban from the TV journalists stubs. I think my banishment is a little harsh.

I hope that you can grant my appeal. I know it will be a long shot.

Thanks for understanding.

(Aeverine Frathleen Nieves (talk) 18:40, 15 December 2007 (UTC))[reply]

Added a reason to the edit of the article "Swedish people"[edit]

Added a reason to the edit of "Swedish people". Thanks for telling me about it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by TheOpen (talk • contribs) 16:16, 14 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your fast responses to vandalism[edit]

I was happy to see how quickly you responded to a request to block a vandalism-only account. Thank you! Rob Banzai (talk) 18:57, 14 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please Re-think your actions[edit]

I hadn't even finished my article when you deleted it? 2 Many Units is one of the fastest growing bands in the North east of England. Just because YOU haven't heard of them doesn't make them un-important. I would like my work returned please and I find it very rude that you would delete my article. I hope to get in touch with a higher athority on wikipedia and report your needless actions.

Thank you, Joshua Walker —Preceding unsigned comment added by Josh ace (talk • contribs) 00:00, 15 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

First Cloned Baby[edit]

NawlinWiki,

From glancing at your Talk page, it seems like you really enjoying classifying articles as "nonsense" when they clearly are something else. My First Cloned Baby article, while definitely not of value and worthy of deletion, should be defined as a Hoax and not as nonsense.

Thank you, Astrochris (talk) 05:03, 15 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

CfD nomination of Category:Erotica websites[edit]

Hayden Panettiere discography[edit]

Hi. I was about to place a redirect from merge template on the page when it was deleted. As my edit summary when I declined the speedy indicated, the contents were merged into Hayden Panettiere and we need to retain the article for GFDL compliance. Unless you have information about it that I don't, would you mind restoring it or mind if I did so that it can be so tagged? :) --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 13:22, 15 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Are you gone for the day? That would be just my luck. :D --Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 13:39, 15 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Why you deleted this story: It's not about promoting a site. It is about showing people what a person in writing can do. Sorry that this encyclopedia is having problems with spammers, but what makes you the real factor of what is spam or not.

From: Susan Lee Arnold,

Hello, I am the publicist for TheFanNJ. TheFanNJ has done some historical things in writing this year in 2007. We are not trying to promote a web page, or a company. What we are doing is showing people that a person who has a passion for writing can do unbelievable things. We tried to for fill the requirements to submit to Wikipedia, and that was just not good enough for the editor. The pen name TheFanNJ has been one of the best writers online and is known nationwide. What he did in 2007 should be on Wikipedia because it allows kids that have problems with learning disabilities to see a student progress in learning and writing. If you want to submit the article so that it fits Wikipedia standards please give us an email, so we can send you TheFanNJ's credentials. The world needs to know what TheFanNJ has done in 2007 because of his background. Thank you: you can also email TheFanNJ's publicist at thefan22117@yahoo.com Page deleted: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TheFanNJ

"We placed this in the wrong spot and waited for your responce, which we didn't get. We would like you to respond to the above email because it shows that you are the major factor why TheFanNJ is not on wikipedia."

hy would you delete the Americas Report entry=[edit]

it was pure facts about the publication. wiki is about information. what's the point of contributing if everything gets deleted. how can i rewrite to make it stick. please advise. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kkinstler (talk • contribs) 22:19, 17 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AmericasReport.com is a blog-powered news site founded by James Valles, featuring hyperlinks to various news sources and columnist. Americas Report was launched on August 15, 2007 as a news and commentary outlet. Its roster of bloggers includes people from all walks of life.

is that better??? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kkinstler (talk • contribs) 22:27, 17 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

at least i feel like im making progress. now i need sources. what types of sources. magazine articles? newspaper clippings? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kkinstler (talk • contribs) 22:29, 17 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

okay i have a bunch of articles. what am i looking for? just the basic info im writing about. like when it was published. who blogs on the site? who founded it? verifying those facts only? or what else do u need?????? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kkinstler (talk • contribs) 22:37, 17 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Warning received[edit]

I just wanted to clarify what I was trying to do when I received a warning for creating a spam page. I saw the page in the newly created pages section, saw that it should be deleted, and tagged it for speedy deletion. Apparently, I wasn't quick enough, because in the time I tried to add the tag, the article was deleted, so the article was created anew (with my mark for speedy deletion). My apologies. I'd thought to venture a bit deeper into helping out Wikipedia by marking inappropriate articles as such. Clearly, there's a large enough community in place that my attempt at this caused vandalism rather than helping to prevent it. Again, my apologies.DaveClapper (talk) 18:21, 18 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Gungner Theories deletion[edit]

Since the page was deleted as I posted this, I don't supect you'll get a chance to read it there: If a .PDF preview of the work were submitted for public review, would that allow the page's continued existence? Also, with a currently unpublished work, would that violate any future copyrights once it is submitted to a publisher? I don't entirely understand Wikipedia's stance on copyrights. Darienfawkes (talk) 16:16, 19 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! ImprobCat addressed my issue a little more directly, but thanks anyway for the attempt. Darienfawkes (talk) 19:53, 19 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

GetAmped[edit]

Hi, the GetAmped article which you deleted as nonsense had in fact just been vandalised - could you restore the earlier version? It's being discussed in an AfD and will probably be deleted anyway, mind you. --Bonadea (talk) 17:54, 19 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Never mind, you'd discovered it :-) --Bonadea (talk) 17:55, 19 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

What?[edit]

Didn't even finish (barely started) that article before it was deleted! I was testing out the code to see if it worked when blam it's all gone. Bring it back! The important or 'interesting' parts weren't even typed! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Aswandive63 (talk • contribs) 18:00, 19 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sleeping Giant (band)[edit]

Hi, I saw you speedied this article. I'd like to look at the last revision to perhaps restore it; can you please userfy it for me? Thanks Chubbles (talk) 21:45, 19 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock request you may want to provide comment on[edit]

See here. Seems like the IP in question is used by HSBC. However, the IP in question is not blocked, but neither is the account. His message says this was due to your block of 100delinquentez. Anything we should know? Daniel Case (talk) 15:41, 20 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Query on deletion of "Halves (band)"[edit]

Hi there, I wish to enquire as to the reason for this page deletion. I realise that it is not possible to accomodate all existing bands, however "halves" are already referenced elsewhere in Wikipedia, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ireland_in_the_Eurosonic_Festival . In recent months, "halves" have gained a high degree of exposure in Ireland, courtesy of the Irish Times(the Irish paper of record) as per the ref to the above article, as well as numerous other media outlets (print and radio - links can be provided upon request.)

Having played at Ireland's most renowned festival "Electric picnic" this year, as well as a forthcoming performance at Europe's largest music showcase event, I urge you to reconsider the deletion of this article. thank you kindly Dr. David Scanlon halves —Preceding unsigned comment added by 155.94.78.221 (talk) 16:23, 20 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Bree Olson[edit]

Hallo, excuse me, for my VERY VERY BAD english. I'm an user of Italian Wikipedia. The last august, you had protect title Bree Olson. She's a nominee at the AVN Best New Starlet Award for 2007. I think she's notable. See you --Robocooop (talk) 16:35, 20 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I think she's notable, because she's a nominee for a well-known award, like the AVN Best New Starlet Award. Unfortunately, I've not found a lot of realiable independent sources yet. I'll looking for. See you and Merry Christmas! --Robocooop (talk) 09:39, 22 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

culture killers[edit]

why on earth did you delete this page??? it has not violated any rules and is under construction!!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Deltastarr69 (talk • contribs) 20:09, 20 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hey speedy, You might as well delete the Guitar Pick[edit]

The guitar pick was invented, produced and sold, and is used by guitarists everyday. The Option Knob is of the same family and is an actual thing, that was invented, and now produced and sold, and is used by musicians everywhere. The Option Knob is a viable object and contribution to the music industry, just like the Guitar Pick. ...I am waiting for a HUMAN to review this so that an intuitive assessment can be made and this page can hold its place in wikipedia...just like the guitar pick.

The Option Knob page should be reinstated, THANK YOU

I'm a human who's reviewed the article and I agree with NawlinWiki's decision. You're welcome. Accounting4Taste:talk 20:33, 20 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sharesight deletions[edit]

You have deleted the Sharesight entry I added. So I have re-categorised it as Sharesight_(software). The rule CSD A7, suggests that this does not apply to software.

Any suggestions you might have, to allow me to correctly add this item to Wikipedia would be much appreciated. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Nigel.ramsay (talk • contribs) 20:38, 20 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

There are no references to Sharesight at this time. I guess that means that it can't be listed in Wikipedia at this stage? Until there is a reputable reference, and I correct in thinking that I should not add this entry? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Nigel.ramsay (talk • contribs) 20:44, 20 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the advice. Cheers, Nigel. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Nigel.ramsay (talk • contribs) 20:57, 20 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Jupiter Chevrolet deletion[edit]

This article is significant because this car dealer is the oldest family owned and operated auto dealer in the North Texas area (DCC). This fact is significant in and of itself because Dallas has the distinction of having the highest concentration of corporate owned dealers of any major market in the US (NADA). I can see no reason for deletion, based on other entries such as Cerritos Auto Square or Celozzi-Ettleson Chevrolet. Certainly there is nothing in the article promoting a product, so I would like to have the article reinstated. Anthony Haskinis —Preceding unsigned comment added by Anthony Haskinis (talk • contribs) 22:09, 20 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Merry Christmas![edit]

^F_L(some restrictions apply) is wishing you a Merry Christmas! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Don't overdo it on the fudge!

Spread the Holiday cheer by adding {{subst:User:Flaminglawyer/MerryChristmas!}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

RE: Your deletion of The Latke Who Couldn't Stop Screaming[edit]

I'm going to start up an article for this today, and I happened to notice you deleted it under "Patent nonsense". If you were to look it up, you might have realized it was an actual book published by Daniel Handler under the Lemony Snicket pseudonym.--CyberGhostface (talk) 23:25, 20 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Merry Christmas[edit]

Blessed editing, and...

Happy Holidays from Marlith ^T/C Please feel free to contribute to Wikipedia:Song/The Twelve Days of Christmas

Credits: This card was inspired by Macy's 123, assistant of V's Shop

Marlith ^T/C 05:35, 21 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Query on Halves (band)[edit]

My apologies, it is also under just "Halves" link to start of deletion

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special%3ALog&type=delete&user=&page=Halves

It was alternately called halves (band) at some point, so that is where the confusion arose! Thank you David Scanlon —Preceding unsigned comment added by 155.94.78.221 (talk) 11:12, 21 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

your buddy[edit]

have a happy holliday... sorry for deleting your page...lol... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.208.138.233 (talk) 16:16, 21 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Deleting of the IceChat Article[edit]

Hello there

I was told by some people, that the IceChat article has been removed from wikipedia. I am just wondering as to why it was removed, as it had valid content, and was very useful.

I am the creator of IceChat, and own its domain icechat.net.

Please let me know what I need to do, in order to re-instate this article.

Thanks

Snerf (talk) 19:51, 21 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You Have No Idea[edit]

You know I come to Wikipedia alot to find out some information and everything. But now.. I'm beginning to wonder. You've constintly deleted the pages I created without giving me a chance to relay sources about it. Now I may not be famous, or known at all but I'm well on my way to becoming a Trance artist superstar. I have multiple projects that I produce with that you have deleted because your an administrator. I have 2 independant labels, 2 distribution companies, 2 production companies and a handful of movies I'm writing and directing and producing as well as acting. When I do become famous and known around the world I wouldn't want to be listed in this website anyway, I'll make my own website like this and have me be the administrator and run it anyway I want. Then I can go ahead and delete worthless, pointless & rubbish crap that people like you delete and everything. The pages I created are not rubbish like you say... I have a mountain full of sources to back up my claims on what I say on the page. But I'm not a very good writer since I have bad writing skills and what not. Anyway, Good Day to you and your administrative ways. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Firesky (talk • contribs) 20:35, 21 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hay Nawlin: Just a side note of irrelevant commentary - this note to you is one of the most hilarious things I've seen in a while... :) Ψν^Psi_nu 13:35, 26 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

InDepenDance Day, Vol.1 The Takeover[edit]

Hello. A page that you deleted, Nicole Wray Starring in InDepenDance Day, Vol.1 The Takeover, has been re-created under the name of InDepenDance Day, Vol.1 The Takeover. Will you look into it? Thanks. Admc2006 (talk) 14:12, 22 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Stop Editing the Nicole Wray page[edit]

now

Merry Christmas[edit]

Rowanbot (talk) 15:35, 25 December 2007 (UTC)Why did you delete the Boom Monk Ben page? It was notable (long-term relevancy to the UK music scene for over 3 years), referencial (external press sources from the Guardian, the Herald, the List, the Evening Times) and he is also endorsed by relatively well-known UK record labels (Ninja Tunes, Leisure Allstars), who are also referenced in the article. There were also several internal references to other artists already on Wikipedia who have worked in collaboration. I would understand if he was unknown, but I've managed to find 3 other Wikipedia pages in place for his contemporaries. Did you read the talk page before you deleted it? Why did you only allow me a few minutes to write about why I wanted to keep it, and why it was relevant to Wikipedia readers?[reply]

Deletion - Lit Fuse Films[edit]

Thank you for keeping Wikipedia clean of unimportant content, but I would like to contest this deletion. If you would restore the article, I would gladly add the requested content (why it is important). Primarily, Lit Fuse is a jewel of machinima amongst a puke filled slew of putrid waste (no, I won't say that in the article). Their content is highly regarded and very popular. If you would restore the article, I will insert this detail I did not clearly state (but alluded to in the first sentence). I admit, the article was incomplete, and by all definition a work in progress. Please reconsider your deletion. Orangesoda31 (talk)

You said "It doesn't matter how good you think they are -- what matters is whether this company has been recognized as notable by reliable independent sources. So far, there's no evidence of that. NawlinWiki (talk) 04:50, 26 December 2007 (UTC)" I Have such evidence. I can provide links to websites which have awarded litfuse various honors, which includes second and third place honors at the Bitfilm Festival under the machinima category. Both Maintnace Man and Ballad of Black Mesa are creations of LitFuse, and as you can see by visiting the bitfilm award page, these have in fact received awards. [1]. I can also show that on DIGG several of their films have made the front page (Ignis Solus was perhaps the most popular), and many video and machinima oriented sites have found Ignis Solus (one of Lit Fuse's films) to be very popular. I was planning on writing all this in the article when you restored it. Now, would you please restore the article? Orangesoda31 (talk)
If you won't, I will just rewrite it (I have written more trying to get it recreated than I did in the article) with the above mentioned proof of importance stated very clearly, but that seems pretty inefficient, now doesn't it. Why write something twice when all it needs is a new line? Orangesoda31 (talk)

Deletion - The we're mad[edit]

Hi. can i recover my article?, it is ok if you don't pass it, but at least can i have it for my own? No i don't have it in my browser history

URGENT - someone is removing stuff from your talk page[edit]

Hi Nawlin -

See the history page for Special:Contributions/90.195.229.118. I'm being a bit cryptic because it's obvious the perp is looking for this stuff, but the upshot is a) this is an article created by ths subject, so heavy WP:COI b) I put several speedy delete tags and COI notes on this, which the subject deleted, then c) the writer of the note to you DELETED a separate entry that noted lack of source finding from YOUR talk page. (I'm making a leap of faith that the IP number is the same as the creator, since the only other edits are my tags and the material added by the creator, who wisely used his own name as his user name, then created only one article, the subject of which was himself.).

Your suspicions are apparently correct, and if this page cannot be speedy deleted, I will happily AfD. I'll also keep an eye on things... Ψν^Psi_nu 13:30, 26 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I would support an AFD here as the best way to resolve this. Thanks, NawlinWiki (talk) 13:58, 26 December 2007 (UTC)

- Will do. Thanks... Ψν^Psi_nu 14:15, 26 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

- - (FYI - further discussion from my talk page - any guidance on your part will be appreciatively accepted!)

- - I'm not sure whether an AFD is worthwhile. It seems the IP (as you say, most probably the creator of the page) removed the speedy deletion tag, which hasn't been reinstated, so technically the page should be under that. Just add back the {{db-bio}} to the page, I'm sure the deleting administrator will review the page history and be able to judge the COI or anything else correctly. Thank you for contacting me over this matter. Regards, Rt . 14:32, 26 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

- - OK, I'll try it one more time. Hopefully this time it will stick long enough for someone to have a look. If not, I'll go the AfD route. I tend to get a bit tenacious when someone plays games with the system. (See the response directly above the Chisti material here for a stellar example of someone who, by contrast, worked with me in a constructive way!) Ψν^Psi_nu 14:40, 26 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

InDepenDance Day; Vol.1 The Takeover[edit]

He's at it again. User:Soccermeko has recreated the page yet again. This time it's InDepenDance Day; Vol.1 The Takeover. It seems that this user has no interest in following Wikipedia rules. He's been warned numerous times not to recreate deleted pages and was told to take the case to deletion review, [2] but he ignored the warning and recreated it anyway. Will you look into this matter? Admc2006 (talk) 23:55, 28 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Manhasset Lacrosse DRV[edit]

An editor has asked for a deletion review of Manhasset Lacrosse. Since you closed the deletion discussion for this article, speedy-deleted it, or were otherwise interested in the article, you might want to participate in the deletion review. --lifebaka (Talk - Contribs) 15:30, 30 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Panetics[edit]

As the most recent deleter of Panetics, can you have a look at the recreated article and offer your thoughts? As per the comments on the talk page, I think this is not only a borderline copyvio, but is unsalvageably incoherent (warning: the organisation's own site is just as rambling), but I don't really want to AfD it while it's still being worked on just in case it improves. — iridescent 18:02, 31 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Vertroleum[edit]

The Vertroleum page was re-added. Since you were involved in the prior deletion, could you please remove it again. It is wholly inappropriate in Wikipedia. Is there a way to inhibit the recreation of the page? Thanks E8 (talk) 01:14, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Vertroleum[edit]

Why is this topic being targeted?? It is not advertising! We have made no link to a Company. It is a true lab certified replacement for crude. Please explain why it is being deleted, or suggest someone who can write it to Wiki specs, Thanks, Kmazer (talk) 13:47, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

For Option Knob, I'm glad you are a human...[edit]

Then you should be able to understand that I am trying to post up an exciting new invention for my cousin, who yes happened to invent it (everything is invented at some point). He is not so tech savy (not that i am great) and his invention is undeniably a viable "thingie" to be posted on this site. Just like the Guitar Pick, just like the Chair, just like the Mouse you are using right now with your computer. The article was done descriptively and not as an advertising tool - he didnt even ask me to do it. In addition, if there is just a portion of the page that you feel does not comply then feel free to take it out and post up the rest of it. Please consider that this is a real patented thing, and it has just as much right to be included on this website as the Door Knob. Thank you for your understanding and help. I also understand that there is a lot of bogus content & ill intent posted every day that you have to sift through, so I thank you again for your patience with me. Best Regards, —Preceding unsigned comment added by Chalhub (talk • contribs) 21:11, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Radioactive (album)[edit]

Another editor has added the "{{prod}}" template to the article Radioactive (album), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the editor doesn't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and has explained why in the article (see also Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not and Wikipedia:Notability). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia or discuss the relevant issues at its talk page. If you remove the {{prod}} template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. BJBot (talk) 17:17, 3 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]