User talk:Nayanhalder57
Blocked for sockpuppetry[edit]
 | This account has been blocked indefinitely from editing for sock puppetry per evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Nayanhalder57. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you believe that this block was in error, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Katietalk 20:18, 28 August 2017 (UTC) |
Hello Katie i understand, so now please unblock me, i will never used multiple accounts, Nayanhalder57 (talk) 07:21, 3 September 2017 (UTC)
Request for Unblock[edit]
Nayanhalder57 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
hello block administrator, please Unblock me, i will never use multiple accounts, delete my another wiki user account User:Bhattacharya57 and User:Priyasengupta, Now please Unblock me, thanku and sorry for this
Decline reason:
Your talk page history is full of warnings for various forms of disruption and your response to GeneralizationsAreBad show that you still don't understand what you've done wrong. Sockpuppetry was just the tip of the iceberg, and unless you show and understanding of what you've been doing wrong and how you plan to edit going forward, you will not be unblocked. If these kind of unblock requests continue then your talk page access will also be removed. —SpacemanSpiff 03:56, 15 September 2017 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
- Could you tell me what sorts of contributions you would make if unblocked? GABgab 19:37, 5 September 2017 (UTC)
I will help improve Wikipedia by adding sources, write and edit article etc. Nayanhalder57 (talk) 10:13, 6 September 2017 (UTC)
Request for Unblock[edit]
Hello User:KrakatoaKatie, please Unblock me, i will never used multiple accounts and i will follow the wikipedia policy. So please Unblock me soon, Thank you Nayanhalder57 (talk) 17:25, 8 September 2017 (UTC)
Please help[edit]
Hello Megalibrarygirl, i have got block for some reason, can you tell me, that how can i got unblocked, please help me Nayanhalder57 (talk) 16:29, 9 September 2017 (UTC)
Nayanhalder57 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
UTRS appeal #19227 was submitted on Sep 13, 2017 16:52:50. This review is now closed.
--UTRSBot (talk) 16:52, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
Nayanhalder57 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
hello sir, please unblock me, i want to contribute to Wikipedia. Now i never use multiple Wikipedia accounts. So please unblock me
Decline reason:
Procedural close. Only one request at a time should be open. Seraphimblade Talk to me 17:32, 13 September 2017 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Nomination of The Dakshin Dinajpur District Central Cooperative Bank for deletion[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Dakshin Dinajpur District Central Cooperative Bank is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Dakshin Dinajpur District Central Cooperative Bank until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 16:56, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:DDDCCB Logo.jpg[edit]
Thanks for uploading File:DDDCCB Logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:43, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
A page you started (Kaldighi) has been reviewed![edit]
Thanks for creating Kaldighi, Nayanhalder57!
Wikipedia editor Boleyn just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:
This has been tagged for one issue.
To reply, leave a comment on Boleyn's talk page.
Learn more about page curation.
Boleyn (talk) 08:25, 2 February 2018 (UTC)
An article you recently created, Kaldighi, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please follow the confirms on the Articles for Creation template atop the page. Atsme📞📧 23:33, 2 February 2018 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:Kaldighi[edit]
Hello, Nayanhalder57. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Kaldighi".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Hhkohh (talk) 08:30, 3 August 2018 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Cholte Cholte Bolte Bolte Album Logo.jpg[edit]
Thanks for uploading File:Cholte Cholte Bolte Bolte Album Logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:50, 10 July 2020 (UTC)
Nomination of Gangarampur High School for deletion[edit]
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gangarampur High School until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
1друг (talk) 19:09, 9 June 2021 (UTC)
Nomination of Gangarampur Girls' High School for deletion[edit]
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gangarampur Girls' High School until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Trap133 (talk) 10:53, 19 June 2021 (UTC)
Nomination of Gangarampur B.Ed College for deletion[edit]
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gangarampur B.Ed College until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Trap133 (talk) 07:01, 20 June 2021 (UTC)
The article Government Inter College Noida has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
No coverage to meet WP:NSCHOOL. Only a primary source provided.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.
This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 29 June 2023 (UTC)
The article Avviare Educational Hub has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
No independent sources provided to establish notability.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jdcooper (talk) 22:17, 15 August 2023 (UTC)
Nomination of Avviare Educational Hub for deletion[edit]
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Avviare Educational Hub until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.