User talk:Neha.20srivastava

Your submission at Articles for creation: New Modern Buildwell Pvt. Ltd. (December 9)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by APerson was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:New Modern Buildwell Pvt. Ltd. and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

APerson (talk!) 16:42, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Neha.20srivastava, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! APerson (talk!) 16:42, 9 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you use Wikipedia for soapboxing, promotion or advertising, as you did at Liberty Videocon General Insurance. 207.93.13.145 (talk) 14:56, 5 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest[edit]

Hello, Neha.20srivastava. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the article Liberty Videocon General Insurance, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. In particular, please:

avoid editing or creating articles related to you and your circle, your organization, its competitors, projects or products;
instead propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the {{request edit}} template);
when discussing affected articles, disclose your COI (see WP:DISCLOSE);
avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing and autobiographies. Thank you. GermanJoe (talk) 11:30, 6 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Voylla[edit]

Hello Neha.20srivastava,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Voylla for deletion, because it seems to be promotional, rather than an encyclopedia article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Kavdiamanju (talk) 13:43, 19 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:New Modern Buildwell Pvt. Ltd. concern[edit]

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:New Modern Buildwell Pvt. Ltd., a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 00:17, 23 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:New Modern Buildwell Pvt. Ltd.[edit]

Hello, Neha.20srivastava. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "New Modern Buildwell Pvt. Ltd.".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Puffin ^{Let's talk!} 10:21, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphan Pages[edit]

Hello,

Why is this message showing at Voylla Wiki Page?

"'This article is an orphan, as no other articles link to it. Please introduce links to this page from related articles; try the Find link tool for suggestions."

Please guide me to fix this.

Thank You, Neha

Nomination of Voylla for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Voylla is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Voylla until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Light2021 (talk) 20:53, 21 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]