User talk:Neilpw1

Neil Pakenham-Walsh is the coordinator of HIFA2015 (Healthcare Information For All by 2015) and co-director of the Global Healthcare Information Network. He started his career as a hospital doctor in the UK, and has clinical experience in rural Ecuador and Peru. For the last 18 years he has been committed to improving the availability of healthcare information for health workers in developing countries. He has worked with the World Health Organization, the Wellcome Trust, and INASP (International Network for the Availability of Scientific Publications).

Proposed deletion of Healthcare Information For All by 2015[edit]

The article Healthcare Information For All by 2015 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

no evidence that it meets the notability criteria for organisations

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 23:31, 17 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Healthcare Information For All by 2015 for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Healthcare Information For All by 2015 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Healthcare Information For All by 2015 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 11:09, 18 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:HIFA2015 Logo Clearer Version.gif listed for deletion[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:HIFA2015 Logo Clearer Version.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. kashmiri 10:53, 24 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:HIFA2015Logo.JPG)[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:HIFA2015Logo.JPG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:22, 30 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Knowledge Management[edit]

Please STOP making contested changes - use the talk page. KM4DEV is a limited forum it is not an authority - I know as I think I am a member and have spoken at events, Nothing said or agreed there has any relevance too wikipedia which works from established reliable sources. Its a good forum with good people but wikipedia works from cited material only ----Snowded ^TALK 09:19, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]