User talk:Neitzs

Hey! Good luck with your assignment, if you need any help let me know! 35.13.150.104 (talk) 18:59, 19 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Survey[edit]

Hi Neitzs!

I have put together a survey for female editors of Wikipedia (and related projects) in order to explore, in greater detail, women's experiences and roles within the Wikimedia movement. It'd be wonderful if you could participate!

It's an independent survey, done by me, as a fellow volunteer Wikimedian. It is not being done on behalf of the Wikimedia Foundation. I hope you'll participate!

Just click this link to participate in this survey, via Google!

Any questions or concerns, feel free to email me or stop by my user talk page. Also, feel free to share this any other female Wikimedians you may know. It is in English, but any language Wikimedia participants are encouraged to participate. I appreciate your contributions - to the survey and to Wikipedia! Thank you! SarahStierch (talk) 23:31, 4 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

American Civil Rights Institute[edit]

Hello, please provide this article with references to secondary publications. You can not write an article on Wikipedia about an organization, based solely on what that organization says about itself on its website. In order to establish notability of the organization in Wikipedia, you must provide references to reliable sources noting this organization. You can contact more for more details. Thank you, --hydrox (talk) 02:56, 27 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of American Civil Rights Institute[edit]

The article American Civil Rights Institute has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Does not establish notability through secondary sources.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. hydrox (talk) 15:01, 27 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I've removed the proposed deletion notice, since there are sources that establish notability, but I agree with Hydrox that these should be mentioned in the article. I've given one source on the talk page. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 15:24, 27 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]