User talk:Nemroyo

Welcome!

Hello, Nemroyo! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking

or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! I dream of horses If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{U|I dream of horses}} to your message (talk to me) (My edits) @ 23:36, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Getting Started
Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia • Tutorial • Your first article How to: edit a page • upload an image
Getting Help
Frequently Asked Questions New contributors' help page Where to: ask questions • make requests Tip of the day Request administrator attention
Policies and Guidelines
Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Simplified Manual of Style • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sock puppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability

The Community
Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump IRC channels • Mailing lists Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community (The Signpost)
Things to do
Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism
Miscellaneous
Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Editing a Semi-Protected Page[edit]

Hello,

As the title suggests, I wanted to know how to edit a semi-protected page. Thanks in advance.

I dream of horses

Hello, welcome to Wikipedia. About semi-protection: "Semi-protection prevents edits from unregistered users (IP addresses), as well as edits from any account that is not autoconfirmed (is at least four days old and has at least ten edits to Wikipedia) or confirmed.". Shlome. Shmayo (talk) 20:04, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reply[edit]

Hi again Nemroyo. You are just six edits away from being able to make changes to the article, it's not that hard to get to ten edits. I think you should consider that, you could help alot here. But I did read what you wrote and I agree with most of it. Just don't have the time to make the changes at the moment. Fush b shlomo. Shmayo (talk) 17:12, 5 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

August 2017[edit]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for continued slow revert-warring over unsourced material at Assyrians despite clear warnings on talk. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Fut.Perf. ☼ 07:02, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion[edit]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Nemroyo being reported by User:2605:6001:eb50:a900:4860:cefd:e0f9:6688 (Result: Declined, malformed report). Thank you. NeilN ^{talk to me} 00:07, 24 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

How valid is this study?[edit]

Shlamalakh,

I found this 2000 study about Assyrians and it said “the closest genetic relationships with th Assyrians are the native populations of Jordan and Iraq.” It also said that Iraqi and Jordanian Arabs are more related to Assyrians than Gulf Arabs. Can you try and debunk this? Thank you.

http://www.atour.com/health/docs/20000720a.html

Are you the person who keeps editing the page? That study is from 18 years ago. It is extremely outdated as the science and accuracy behind genetics testing have progressed significantly since then. It has been known for awhile now that Assyrians are genetically closer to Armenians, eastern Turks, Mesopotamian Jews, etc. rather than Iraqis and Kurds, who are more Arabian and Iranian, respectfully. Aside from science proving Assyrians aren’t close to the Jordanian Arabs, it should be apparent given that Jordanians are the result of Bedouins settled by Britain in the early 20th century and are not geographically nearby. And it was debunked by the study I provided. Nemroyo (talk) 02:08, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked again[edit]

I've blocked you again, for continuing the same long-term pattern of persistent slow revert-warring on the Assyrians article. Fut.Perf. ☼ 22:34, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Nemroyo (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I do not understand why I was blocked when I sourced my edit to the piece. Are the other "three" users who added nothing blocked as well? Those being Thenabster126, some random person on my talkpage, and 24.86.158.114 all started changing it within the last 24 hours without sourcing anything. Same with Florian Blaschke who changed things for the sake of changing only.

Decline reason:

Based on the discussion below this, unblocking you would be pointless. You justify your actions and say you were not expecting to be unblocked. It would be better in the future to present your arguments on the talk page rather than revert warring because you know you are right. thanks -- Dlohcierekim (talk) 07:22, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Non-admin comment: Some advice, from looking at your unblock request it is extremely unlikely you will be unblocked, for starters you haven't even addressed the reason for why you were blocked, secondly, as per the Blocking policy it's pointless asking why another user(s) waasn't blocked, you were blocked because of what you did, not for what others have done. You need to address why you were blocked and convince the admin reviewing your case that you understand why you were blocked in the first place and that you will not continue to edit in such a manner in the future. Hope this helps. -- 🐇 ChocolateRabbit 02:13, 27 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I wasn't expecting to be unblocked. I know what I was doing, which was reverting back abuse to a page by people that know nothing on the subject or are intentionally messing up the page (me using the "not allowed" "warring" method to do so), and not being monitored or reprimanded. Like the one who just made edits again misquoting a source to fulfill whatever their agenda is and removing the part I copied verbatim from the source to counter it. So, if I hypothetically went to correct this misinformation in the future, I'd have to deal with the same problem of people vandalizing the page and me appearing as the one in the wrong. Furthermore, it's not "pointless" when I'm questioned by four supposedly separate accounts within the course of 24 hours of adding in a study to disprove their nonsense because they're a bunch of supremacists. These Assyrian pages are a mess because halfwits are editing things based off of what they "feel" is right when they know basically nothing of the Assyrian population. I can even direct you to one of the accounts that attacked me with no substance on a talk page even with the 2017 source I provided with hard scientific evidence. Anyway, I appreciate the advice, but the issue here lies more in the fact that I'm dealing with people racist against Assyrians when editing that page, so it's an uphill battle when an admin sides with (yes, I am saying sides with, even if they are just doing their job) them over someone who is actually trying to improve it (and that page is overall a mess). Nemroyo (talk) 03:35, 27 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Indef[edit]

Blocked again, this time indefinitely. You have continued edit-warring despite multiple warnings, and your talk page contributions show a complete inability or unwillingness to take other people's arguments on board. Fut.Perf. ☼ 06:12, 15 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Can you explain specifically how me reverting an edit that happened within 24 hours of my last message after you said "give people time to respond before making an edit" is cause for blocking? The edits used the sources I added to support unfounded claims. Nemroyo (talk) 20:34, 16 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Socking[edit]

Dinduu is Confirmed to Nemroyo.
— Berean Hunter (talk) 08:45, 2 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]