User talk:Neptunekh2

This user may have left Wikipedia. Neptunekh2 has not edited Wikipedia for a considerable amount of time. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else.

Dlasta[edit]

Start the article in your sandbox by clicking on this link User:Neptunekh2/Dlasta. Then we can have a look at what you have got. And please try not to post the same request in 3 places again. --Elen of the Roads (talk) 13:18, 1 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

By the way - what made you think Homer Simpson was of French descent? --Elen of the Roads (talk) 13:31, 1 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I think you have a problem with the article. Only the first sentence is about Dlasca. All the rest of the text is about Valasca. As far as I know, the only source left to us in which her name occurs is Historia Boëmii, written by Aeneas Silvius, better known as Pope Pius II. This document does not appear to have ever been published in modern times - you'd probably have to go to Vatican City for a copy. The source you have - The Amazons, by Guy Cadogan Rothery - was published in 1910 and does not include a list of sources, so we don't know if he had more information. There just isn't enough material here for an article. Instead, you could probably add her to List_of_women_warriors_in_folklore along with Libussa who has an article, and Valasca who will have an article soon. --Elen of the Roads (talk) 21:42, 1 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem: User:Neptunekh2/Dlasta[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as User:Neptunekh2/Dlasta, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to contain material copied from http://www.sacred-texts.com/wmn/ama/ama07.htm, and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:

If you have permission from the author to release the text under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), leave a message explaining the details at User talk:Neptunekh2/Dlasta and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". Make sure you quote the exact page name, User:Neptunekh2/Dlasta, in your email. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted "under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), version 3.0, or that the material is released into the public domain leave a note at User talk:Neptunekh2/Dlasta with a link to where we can find that note.
If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License and GNU Free Documentation License, and note that you have done so on User talk:Neptunekh2/Dlasta. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for instructions.

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at User talk:Neptunekh2/Dlasta saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved. Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! —teb728 t c 02:36, 2 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

That particular text is PD; however, the general advice is very good. If this wasn't a public domain source, it would be a copyvio, which is something you've had issues with before. Keep that in mind. The Blade of the Northern Lights (話して下さい) 23:29, 2 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

ANI[edit]

I'm asking advice about your editing from other editors here [1]. Please feel free to add your comments. Elen of the Roads (talk) 00:20, 3 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

August 2011[edit]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for Although your edits are obviously made in good faith it is unfortunately the case that they are disruptive to the project. You have been warned numerous times about copyvio issues and non-productive edits and these warnings have gone unheeded. Usually in these cases we would suggest that an administrator or editor work with you. However, multiple editors have worked with you and attempted to address these issues with no success. For this reason I am reluctantly blocking you for general disruption of the project.. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Panyd^{The muffin is not subtle} 23:39, 4 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet[edit]

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a suspected sock puppet of Venustar84 (talk · contribs · global contribs · page moves · user creation · block log) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this is a sock puppet account, and your original account is blocked, please also note that banned or blocked users are not allowed to edit Wikipedia; and all edits made under this account may be reverted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. —Darkwind (talk) 07:33, 14 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Kobali for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kobali is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kobali until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

♠PMC♠ (talk) 18:47, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]