User talk:Nerobjabin

There have been two problems with this account: the account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia, and your username indicates that the account represents a business or other organisation or group or a web site, which is also against policy, as an account must be for just one person. Because of those problems, the account has been blocked indefinitely from editing.

If you intend to make useful contributions about some topic other than your business or organisation, you may request an unblock. To do so, post the text {{unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with a new username you are willing to use. See Special:CentralAuth to search for available usernames. Your new username will need to meet our username policy. Replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason to be unblocked. In that reason, you must:

Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.

If you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 11:45, 9 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Nerobjabin (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Actually now I am understand that why I am blocked, I promise also next I will not do it again. I had no wrong intention, I have a good faith. So, Please unblock my account or IP

Decline reason:

Sorry, but there are many concerns that still remain even when taking your username into account and the sandbox page you created (which was deleted per G12). Your username, based off the information I read from the deleted page you created, shows that it represents an organization or company - which is against Wikipedia's username policy. Your edits were about yourself as well, which is behavior that the community discourages and can use to determine whether or not your intentions are to contribute to the encyclopedia. So far, it appears that your intentions are to write about yourself. How exactly are you going to contribute to Wikipedia? What are you going to do? What articles do you plan on editing, creating, or improving? Unfortunately, your unblock request fails to address the root of the issues and concerns I see here, and because of this I must decline your unblock request. Feel free to create a new unblock request that addresses these concerns and answers these questions. Thank you - ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 05:42, 10 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Unblock[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Nerobjabin (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I should be unblocked because of I believe that my intention is good, I agree that I have done mistake but it was made by good faith, I had no Advertising intention. I am already change my username because I want to work for Wikipedia voluntarily, I want to contribute in Wikipedia by my articles, if I will unblock then I make some articles for Wikipedia which will be became helpful for the law students and the general people of my State. I will make some educational atrticle like like study. I am understand why I am auto blocked by Wikipedia. So I will not do that again.

Decline reason:

You aren't autoblocked, you are directly blocked because of your inappropriate edits. Given your conflict of interest, your plans for what you'd edit if unblocked don't convince me you understand the problem. As such, I'm declining your unblock request. Yamla (talk) 15:27, 10 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Nerobjabin (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Please unblock my account and IP because of I am already changed my username and that account is not for promoting or advertising. I will write some article in Wikipedia by maintaining and following the policy of Wikipedia, that was my first and last. I will not do again. My IP and Account is auto block, target no is #8252193, previous user name was Enam Legal House

Decline reason:

Please don't open multiple unblock requests. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 12:41, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Enam Legal House/sandbox[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on User:Enam Legal House/sandbox requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://enamlegalhouse.wixsite.com/enam. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. The Mighty Glen (talk) 11:36, 9 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Nerobjabin (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Please unblock my account and IP because of I am already changed my username and that account is not for promoting or advertising. I will write some article in Wikipedia by maintaining and following the policy of Wikipedia, that was my first and last. I will not do again. My IP and Account is auto block, target no is #8252193, previous user name was Enam Legal House

Decline reason:

Please don't open multiple unblock requests. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 12:41, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

March 2018[edit]

There have been two problems with this account: the account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia, and your username indicates that the account represents a business or other organisation or group or a web site, which is also against policy, as an account must be for just one person. Because of those problems, the account has been blocked indefinitely from editing.

If you intend to make useful contributions about some topic other than your business or organisation, you may request an unblock. To do so, post the text {{unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Please unblock my account and IP because of I am already changed my username and that account is not for promoting or advertising. I will write some article in Wikipedia by maintaining and following the policy of Wikipedia, that was my first and last. I will not do again. My IP and Account is auto block, target no is #8252193, previous user name was Enam Legal House}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with a new username you are willing to use. See Special:CentralAuth to search for available usernames. Your new username will need to meet our username policy. Replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason to be unblocked. In that reason, you must:

Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.

If you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal this block by adding the text

{{unblock|Please unblock my account and IP because of I am already changed my username and that account is not for promoting or advertising. I will write some article in Wikipedia by maintaining and following the policy of Wikipedia, that was my first and last. I will not do again. My IP and Account is auto block, target no is #8252193, previous user name was Enam Legal House}}

at the bottom of your talk page, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 11:45, 9 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comment There was an earlier closed UTRS appeal as Enam Legal House that UTRSbot did not tag here.--Dlohcierekim (talk) 15:43, 10 March 2018 (UTC) [reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Nerobjabin (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #20824 was submitted on Mar 10, 2018 07:21:10. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 07:21, 10 March 2018 (UTC) [reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Nerobjabin (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #20827 was submitted on Mar 10, 2018 14:54:00. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 14:54, 10 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Nerobjabin (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Please unblock my account and IP because of I am already changed my username and that account is not for promoting or advertising. I will write some article in Wikipedia by maintaining and following the policy of Wikipedia, that was my first and last. I will not do again. My IP and Account is auto block, target no is #8252193, previous user name was Enam Legal House

Decline reason:

You will need to respond to the points raise by Dlohcierekim below, as well as addressing your abuse of multiple accounts. Yunshui ^雲 _水 09:21, 12 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Follow up on unblock conditions-- purely informational as I cannot again decline unblock.[edit]

comment-- I really feel this is an important part of the unblock process, else I'd not have put it here. Also, please do not keep placing unblock requests when there are open unblock requests. It will have no effect and is just distracting. Thanks, --Dlohcierekim (talk) 21:09, 10 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speaking for myself, and others may or may not agree, I propose the following.

The proposed new username is acceptable. However, the other elements of the block still need to be addressed.To be unblocked:

you must confirm that this account is used by one individual only
you must agree to avoid creating or directly editing articles related to your organisation (requested edits will still be permitted)
you must agree to abide by the Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use and disclose any paid relationship in accordance with the paid contributor policy
you must indicate what areas of Wikipedia you intend to edit in the future

If you have no interest in editing Wikipedia beyond writing about your organisation, then you will not be unblocked. If this is the case, I recommend you consider alternative outlets.

I'm sorry that this message could not be more favourable. --Dlohcierekim (talk) 20:52, 10 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Also, M. M. ENAM ELAHI (talk · contribs) is

Confirmed to this account. I think it would be best to stick to just one account. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 12:43, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]