User talk:NeverTry4Me/Archive 16
 | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 10 | ← | Archive 14 | Archive 15 | Archive 16 | Archive 17 | Archive 18 | → | Archive 20 |
At Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Casuarina Senior College (2nd nomination), you appear to be WP:BLUDGEONing other editors, making the AfD into a WP:BATTLEGROUND. It's ironic that you accuse others of not looking at WP:SCHOOLOUTCOMES, which states that it is an argument to avoid in deletion discussions. Not only you are using it as an argument, you are accusing others of failing to apply it, which of course they should not. I feel the article is at best borderline, but your behavior on this one seems overly emotional and is not conducive to a collaborative discussion. Jacona (talk) 12:44, 1 August 2022 (UTC)
- Also, it appears you are editing in violation of unblock conditions specified at [1]. Pinging Deepfriedokra. Jacona (talk) 13:34, 1 August 2022 (UTC)
- Oh, come on. Bloody Hell. Thanks, @Jacona:. Deepfriedokra (talk) 13:41, 1 August 2022 (UTC)
- Just starting a second AfD on the same subject so soon after the first one is disruptive and I think violates a guideline somewhere. And that's not a bludgeon, it's a war hammer. You are perilously close to an indefinite block. Deepfriedokra (talk) 13:47, 1 August 2022 (UTC)
- If possible kindly close the AfD on my behalf as the nomination is withdrawn, with my statement "I do hereby withdraw the nomination of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Casuarina Senior College (2nd nomination) with good faith and request a rewrite and ref improve to support the inline contents." Regards- - Signed by NeverTry4Me Talk 21:53, 1 August 2022 (UTC)
- Just starting a second AfD on the same subject so soon after the first one is disruptive and I think violates a guideline somewhere. And that's not a bludgeon, it's a war hammer. You are perilously close to an indefinite block. Deepfriedokra (talk) 13:47, 1 August 2022 (UTC)
- Oh, come on. Bloody Hell. Thanks, @Jacona:. Deepfriedokra (talk) 13:41, 1 August 2022 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Simlabari (Baksa district) has been accepted
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thanks again, and happy editing!
- Signed by NeverTry4Me Talk 10:44, 5 August 2022 (UTC)Your submission at Articles for creation: Simlabari (Goalpara) has been accepted
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thanks again, and happy editing!
- Signed by NeverTry4Me Talk 10:46, 5 August 2022 (UTC)Your submission at Articles for creation: Dumunibagan has been accepted
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thanks again, and happy editing!
- Signed by NeverTry4Me Talk 10:46, 5 August 2022 (UTC)Draft
Instead of creating, submitting and accepting your own draft you can directly create article via mainspace. Just my personal thoughts tho' .... DIVINE (talk) 20:49, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
- @DIVINE: Oh, you are back? I saw none of you active there, Hence, I asked Admins about the pending drafts and did accordingly. - Signed by NeverTry4Me Talk 23:35, 5 August 2022 (UTC)
- @DIVINE you must be happy now for the reverts. - Signed by NeverTry4Me Talk 00:19, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
- NeverTry4Me As far as I know you're the good editor while creating drafts. I no longer hold AFC rights any other rights now. So, you might have not seen me there reviewing Drafts. And there's no reason for me being sad or happy because I just thought to suggest you that's all. Happy editing, DIVINE (talk) 05:41, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
- @DIVINE I'm blocked. Probably I shall quit Wiki as repeated blocks damaged by entire editing. - Signed by NeverTry4Me Talk 05:44, 6 August 2022 (UTC)
- NeverTry4Me As far as I know you're the good editor while creating drafts. I no longer hold AFC rights any other rights now. So, you might have not seen me there reviewing Drafts. And there's no reason for me being sad or happy because I just thought to suggest you that's all. Happy editing, DIVINE (talk) 05:41, 6 August 2022 (UTC)