User talk:Newyorkbrad/Archive/2017/May
Deletion[edit]
I am concerned by this comment of yours. When I find a questionable article I take a look at the notability criteria, check per WP:BEFORE, and then I often nominate it for deletion. If I see some stub about a head-of-state, Olympian, or Nobel Prize winner I leave it alone because I know the notability criteria. I know anyone that played a single game in even some overseas semi-professional league is probably notable because that's what WP:NSPORT says. WP:TVSHOW doesn't say that this episode (or any episode of any show, ever) is inherently notable. I'm not making these nominations to make people angry or because IDONTLIKEIT. For you of all people to claim that every episode of that show is notable is nonsense. I've lost a lot of respect for you because of it. Don't bother replying. You're wrong and the damage you've done is irreparable. Chris Troutman (talk) 23:01, 26 April 2017 (UTC)
User:Cathytalledo[edit]
I believe that this person has been uploading copyrighted and fair use images as her "own" work. I think she believes that if she uploads something, then it is her own work. Can you take a look and see if you can explain it to her? All the best. -- Ssilvers (talk) 04:47, 28 April 2017 (UTC)
Slate essay[edit]
Re the Slate essay you linked here, I wonder:
1. Why is it a Slate essay and not a Wikipedia essay?
2. Has his "bureaucracy reduction" suggestion, specifically, ever been discussed on-wiki? If so, where? ―Mandruss ☎ 18:50, 1 May 2017 (UTC)
- Thanks for your interest. I never know when an Easter egg like that in one of my comments will ever be noticed or not. Answering your queries: (1) You'd have to ask the author that question. As you may know, he's also written a book about Wikipedia, which I reviewed here, but I believe he's done some introspection on-wiki as well, though I forget whether here or on Meta. (2) The subject has been alluded to at various times, but I'm not sure if a dedicated initiative was ever started on it. Perhaps some TPWs can chime in with some useful links. I can imagine how such a discussion would go, however: everyone would agree that the morass of policy-and-guideline pages needs to be chopped back, but when it came down to concrete suggestions to axe a particular page or section, suddenly there would be shrieking, "oh no, that one is important and we can't do without it." Every all, every word of policy-and-guidelines seemed like a good idea to some part of the community, once upon a time. As it happens, I often encounter my own examples of elephantiasis of rulesmaking everytime we get a "request for clarification" of the ruleset on ArbCom discretionary sanctions. I read the request, and I think to myself, "I can't answer that one, because I don't understand all the rules any more myself." And so it goes. Regards, Newyorkbrad (talk) 18:59, 1 May 2017 (UTC)
"Credible threat of harm & murder"[edit]
Thanks for closing this before I saw it. Just, thanksDlohcierekim (talk) 21:15, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
- No problem. Regards, Newyorkbrad (talk) 21:20, 10 May 2017 (UTC)
Ian Brady[edit]
FYI, in the light of three (now four) subsequent calls at WT:ITN for an IAR posting of Ian Brady at RD, I have reopened the discussion at WP:ITNC but have kept your comment in the discussion in its chronological position. Yours, BencherliteTalk 23:34, 15 May 2017 (UTC)
- Okay. Thanks for letting me know. Newyorkbrad (talk) 01:06, 16 May 2017 (UTC)
Offline[edit]
I'll be away for a few days because of a death in the family. Newyorkbrad (talk) 11:43, 16 May 2017 (UTC)
Sunday May 21: Metropolitan Museum of Art Edit-a-thon + global online challenge[edit]
| Sunday May 21, 10:30 am - 4:30pm: Metropolitan Museum of Art Edit-a-thon | |
|---|---|
 The Metropolitan Museum of Art Edit-a-thon: Met Open Access Initiative is the Metropolitan Museum of Art's first edit-a-thon, being hosted on Sunday May 21, 2017 in Thomas J. Watson Library at The Met Fifth Avenue in New York City. The Met is excited to make available over 375,000 images of public domain artworks for contribution to Wikipedia and Wikimedia Commons from the museum’s collection spanning 5,000 years of art. The event is an opportunity for Wikimedia communities to engage The Met's diverse collection onsite and remotely. The event is a key marker too of The Metropolitan Museum of Art's first Wikimedian-in-Residence program, with resident Richard Knipel (User:Pharos), along with Wikimedia NYC. We invite you to help enhance Wikimedia communities and platforms with open access images from The Metropolitan Museum of Art. The event requires pre-registration. To register, 1) please sign-up with Eventbrite via The Met's website and 2) add your Wikipedia username to the #Participants on the wikimeetup page. Please check-in with museum staff when you arrive at the Thomas J. Watson Library within the museum. We also welcome remote participation for the global Met Open Access Artworks Challenge (15 May - 30 June, 2017), you can sign up there at Met Open Access Artworks Challenge/Participants. --Pharos (talk) 16:24, 16 May 2017 (UTC) | |
(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from this list.)
[edit]
| Wednesday May 24, 7pm: WikiWednesday Salon and Skill-Share NYC | |
|---|---|
  You are invited to join the Wikimedia NYC community for our monthly "WikiWednesday" evening salon (7-9pm) and knowledge-sharing workshop at Babycastles gallery by 14th Street / Union Square in Manhattan. Topics this month include the TED wikiproject, the Met wikiproject, and encouraging free video on Wikimedia Commons! We will include a look at the organization and planning for our chapter, and expanding volunteer roles for both regular Wikipedia editors and new participants. We will also follow up on plans for recent and upcoming edit-a-thons, museum and library projects, education initiatives, and other outreach activities. We welcome the participation of our friends from the Free Culture movement and from all educational and cultural institutions interested in developing free knowledge projects. After the main meeting, pizza/chicken/vegetables and refreshments and video games in the gallery!
We especially encourage folks to add your 5-minute lightning talks to our roster, and otherwise join in the "open space" experience! Newcomers are very welcome! Bring your friends and colleagues! --Pharos (talk) 19:31, 22 May 2017 (UTC)
| |
(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from this list.)