User talk:Newyorkbrad/Archive/2018/Jan
 | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Magnificent
Thanks for your thoughtful comments at ARCA (tired onlookers can skip down to "but procedural formalism doesn't sustain a community or write an encyclopedia
" for the punchline). Fixing a typo might be worthwhile: "We can all can agree" needs one less "can". Johnuniq (talk) 04:05, 8 January 2018 (UTC)
- Thank you. Typo fixed. Regards, Newyorkbrad (talk) 04:07, 8 January 2018 (UTC)
You've got mail
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.Jack Frost (talk) 04:19, 8 January 2018 (UTC)
- Received, thank you. Will respond tomorrow. Newyorkbrad (talk) 04:21, 8 January 2018 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
|
The Barnstar of Diplomacy |
| I appreciate your contributions regarding my topic ban as well as your thoughts on Arbitration Enforcement. --MONGO 13:32, 10 January 2018 (UTC) |
This Sunday! Wikipedia Day NYC Celebration and Mini-Conference (updated speakers + schedule)
| Sunday January 14: Wikipedia Day NYC 2018 | |
|---|---|
  Part of Wikipedia's global 17th birthday celebration, Wikipedia Day NYC 2018 at Ace Hotel will include a mini-conference of scheduled panels as well as unconference style talks and discussions proposed by attendees on the day of the event. We are very excited to announce speakers such as Jason Scott (Internet Archive), Jackie Koerner (Visiting Scholar, Wiki Ed), and Andrew Lih (Wikimedia DC), as well as a fantastic line-up of panels that highlight projects and issues of relevance to the Wikimedia NYC community. See Wikipedia Day NYC 2018 speakers + schedule And there will be cake. We also hope for the participation of our friends from the Free Culture movement and from educational and cultural institutions interested in developing free knowledge projects.
We especially encourage folks to add your 5-minute lightning talks to our roster, and otherwise join in the "open space" experience! Newcomers are very welcome! Bring your friends and colleagues! --Megs (talk) 02:23, 13 January 2018 (UTC) | |
Query on DS
Hi Brad, I'd like to access your encyclopaedic knowledge of ArbCom sanctions, if I may. I'm wondering if there is any active DS regime covering areas of human sexuality. I realise that transgendered biographies and the like are covered by the Sexology decision and the subsequent Gamergate cases, but I am not sure if those would stretch to human sexuality. Thanks, EdChem (talk) 10:26, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
- @EdChem: I don't believe discretionary sanctions apply broadly to human sexuality issues. Discretionary sanctions are currently authorized for "gender-related disputes" (which is deemed broad enough to pick up transgender issues), but not beyond that. Regards, Newyorkbrad (talk) 23:51, 16 January 2018 (UTC)
11 years of adminship
