User talk:NickWadley26

Welcome!

Hello, NickWadley26, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as User:NickWadley26, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content policies and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.

Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.

• Article development
• Standard layout
• Lead section
• The perfect article
• Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, ask me on my talk page. You can also type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 21:57, 23 February 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of User:NickWadley26

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. A tag has been placed on User:NickWadley26 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 21:57, 23 February 2023 (UTC)

Opinions

In this series of edits to DT Eightron, you added what appears to be your own personal opinion or analysis of this particular topic. Wikipedia is not the place for this. You may report on analyses that have been published in reliable sources, but you may not add your own analysis. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 19:59, 4 April 2023 (UTC)

Sorry WikiDan, I am simply doing this for a school assignment. Furthermore, this analyses has nothing to do with my personal opinion. If you would like, I can tell you when I receive my grade for this assignment so you can take it down. NickWadley26 (talk) 20:06, 4 April 2023 (UTC)

School assignment or not, all material on Wikipedia must conform to Wikipedia guidelines, and that includes the addition of unsourced analysis. Your personal analysis of the working conditions of Japanese manga animators, and how that is reflected in the themes of the show, are original research, and are disallowed at Wikipedia. You may need to seek guidance from your teacher or professor on how to proceed without violating Wikipedia guidelines. For example, if you can cite a published analysis of DT Eightron that comes to the conclusion you are trying to add, you may reference that analysis, and indicate that the analysis is the work of one particular author or set of authors (i.e. the analysis cannot be spoken in Wikipedia's voice). You can say John Smith has found the themes of DT Eightron reminiscent of the working conditions of the Japanese animators themselves (as long as you can cite that analysis), but you cannot say The themes of DT Eightron are reminiscent of the working conditions of the Japanese animators. Do you see the subtle difference there? If, however, it is your own analysis that leads you to this conclusion, unless you have published this analysis in a reliable source, it has no place on Wikipedia. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 20:37, 4 April 2023 (UTC)

I do have a source that talks about the working conditions of Japanese animators and compared it to the description on Wikipedia. Therefore, I am comparing a reliable source to what has already been approved by the website itself NickWadley26 (talk) 21:05, 4 April 2023 (UTC)

I really have to ask you to stop, at risk of getting blocked. Yes, the New York Times article does describe hardhips faced by Japanese animators, but it does not then claim that DT Eightron is illustrative of that or a reaction to those hardships. That part (which is the critical part of the analysis) is your own conclusion. I've also removed the "Globalization" section, since that has nothing at all to do with DT Eightron (but might, if properly sourced, be useful at the Anime article). WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 21:32, 4 April 2023 (UTC)

Hey WikiDan61, could you please check these sites to make sure I can use them for this article? Thank you! https://www.animenewsnetwork.com/encyclopedia/anime.php?id=2186

https://gamerant.com/best-anime-set-22nd-century/#overlord

https://saalck-uky.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/discovery/fulldisplay?docid=cdi_proquest_reports_233760176&context=PC&vid=01SAA_UKY:UKY&lang=en&search_scope=MyInst_and_CI&adaptor=Primo%20Central&tab=Everything&query=any,contains,dt%20eightron&offset=0

https://9animetv.to/watch/dt-eightron-6541?ep=92362 NickWadley26 (talk) 22:26, 4 April 2023 (UTC) NickWadley26 (talk) 22:42, 4 April 2023 (UTC)

Notice of No Original Research Noticeboard discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:No original research/Noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is User:NickWadley26 at DT Eightron.The discussion is about the topic topic. Thank you.

You left me no choice but to report this matter to administrators. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 21:43, 4 April 2023 (UTC)

April 2023

Hello, I'm Philipnelson99. I noticed that you made a change to an article, DT Eightron, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Philipnelson99 (talk) 21:46, 4 April 2023 (UTC)

Hey Phillip, could you please check these sites to make sure I can use them for this article? Thank you! https://www.animenewsnetwork.com/encyclopedia/anime.php?id=2186

https://gamerant.com/best-anime-set-22nd-century/#overlord

https://saalck-uky.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/discovery/fulldisplay?docid=cdi_proquest_reports_233760176&context=PC&vid=01SAA_UKY:UKY&lang=en&search_scope=MyInst_and_CI&adaptor=Primo%20Central&tab=Everything&query=any,contains,dt%20eightron&offset=0

https://9animetv.to/watch/dt-eightron-6541?ep=92362 NickWadley26 (talk) 22:26, 4 April 2023 (UTC)

Nick:

• https://www.animenewsnetwork.com/encyclopedia/anime.php?id=2186 is user-generated content, and so is not considered a reliable source.
• https://gamerant.com/best-anime-set-22nd-century/#dt-eightron is a blogging/listicle site. Not likely to be considered a reliable source, and nothing there verifies your thesis.
• https://saalck-uky.primo.exlibrisgroup.com/discovery/fulldisplay?docid=cdi_proquest_reports_233760176&context=PC&vid=01SAA_UKY:UKY&lang=en&search_scope=MyInst_and_CI&adaptor=Primo%20Central&tab=Everything&query=any,contains,dt%20eightron&offset=0 looks to be a legitimate source for the information it contains, but again, it says nothing of your thesis about DT Eightron being some metaphor for the suffering of Japanese animators.
• https://9animetv.to/watch/dt-eightron-6541?ep=92362 is an actual video of a DT Eightron episode. You may use that to verify the content of the episode, but not as a source for any conclusions you choose to draw about the episode.

I hope this helps. WikiDan61^ChatMe!_ReadMe!! 23:39, 4 April 2023 (UTC)

Thanks @WikiDan61, appreciate you taking the time to review. Philipnelson99 (talk) 01:43, 5 April 2023 (UTC)

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at DT Eightron, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Bbb23 (talk) 22:57, 4 April 2023 (UTC)

Thank you! I was going to use the third link to talk about how DT Eightron was used to appeal to a bigger audience! I was also going to use the video to describe an episode of the anime!

I have come up with two mo links that I think are reliable sources:

https://archive.org/details/dteightronost (give users the ability to listen to the soundtrack, website from my college's database)

https://www.fujitv.com/contents/ (Official site of Bandai Namco Filmworks (aka Sunrise); I want to use this article to list their other works since Sunrise's are also mentioned).

Thank you! NickWadley26 (talk) 00:51, 5 April 2023 (UTC)

Neither of those would substantiate the sweeping claims you made in your edits earlier. Philipnelson99 (talk) 01:43, 5 April 2023 (UTC)

I completely understand that! I was thinking about using those websites for completely different purposes than for the edits I made earlier. NickWadley26 (talk) 02:11, 5 April 2023 (UTC)

I'm also disregarding the earlier claims I made NickWadley26 (talk) 02:12, 5 April 2023 (UTC)