User talk:Nickhall263

Hope you enjoy contributing to Wikipedia. Be bold in editing pages. Here are some links that you might find useful:

Try the Tutorial. If you have less time, try Wikipedia:How to edit a page.
To sign your posts (for eg. on talk pages) use ~~~~ (four tildes). This will insert your name and timestamp. To insert just your name, type ~~~ (3 tildes).
You can experiment in the Sandbox.
For help, see Wikipedia:Where to ask a question.
Some other pages that will help you know more about Wikipedia: Manual of Style and Wikipedia:Five pillars, Wikipedia:Neutral point of view, Wikipedia:Civility, Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not
You can contribute in many ways: write a great article, fight vandalism, upload pictures, perform maintainance tasks, contribute to existing projects...

I hope you stick around and keep contributing to Wikipedia. Drop us a note at Wikipedia:New user log.

-- utcursch | talk 09:23, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Pinelands! Bye!.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Pinelands! Bye!.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 11:11, 7 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:Shockey.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Shockey.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 06:06, 20 March 2007 (UTC)

Unspecified source for Image:Edwardh.JPG[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Edwardh.JPG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self-no-disclaimers}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 20:47, 2 April 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Strangerer (Talk) 20:47, 2 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of Chris lovingham[edit]

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Chris lovingham, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Chris lovingham seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Chris lovingham, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. --Android Mouse Bot 2 07:17, 20 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unspecified source for Image:Niggaz.JPG[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Niggaz.JPG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 13:17, 2 July 2007 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 13:17, 2 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re: User_talk:ArielGold#wake_up_call[edit]

You wrote:

dont u dare send a message to my little johnny. he is only 24 years old and "mentally handicapped" and he was playing with his brand new computer. who are you to tell him what is wrong and what is right? leave the parenting up to me. you are some waste who works for wikipedia, go get a life you fat cow. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nickhall263 (talk • contribs)

Dear Nickhall263, first of all, let me direct you to the policy regarding your personal attacks towards me, which are not allowed here. Second, I have no idea who your "little johnny" is, without you providing a user name. Finally, any and all warnings or notices given are done with polite language, as well as being done because the user has done something to warrant them. While I can appreciate your protectiveness, your attacks towards me are not welcome, and if you seek to resolve a situation, do not help your cause. My suggestion would be for you to supervise any edits "johnny" makes to Wikipedia, to ensure additional warnings or notices are not given. Thank you, ^Ariel♥Gold 22:54, 5 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I assure you next time you call anybody on this project a fat cow, especially those who dedicate there time and efforts to this project, I will personally block you. Please read WIkipedias policies on no personal attacks and and information about civility. If you have any questions please feel free to contact me on my user talk page. Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 23:20, 5 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Dedicate time? go ahead delete the stupid thing. You guys on here don't do that great of a job on here anyway. i will call whoever i want a fat cow

Blocked[edit]

You have been blocked for a period of 1 month for making personal attacks. After the block expires, I hope you choose to edit constructivley and in a civil manner. If you have any questions or need assistance after the block expires, please contact me on my user talk page. Thanks! Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 13:48, 6 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of E (DVD)[edit]

I have nominated E (DVD), an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/E (DVD). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Do U(knome)? ^yes...|_{or no} · 22:57, 8 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

facetious

April 2009[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Ryu Lee has been reverted, as it appears to have removed content from the page without explanation. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Jojhutton (talk) 01:51, 14 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ryu Lee[edit]

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Ryu Lee, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Missing reliable sources to indicate notability associated with a non-notable wrestling organization.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. tedder (talk) 19:13, 4 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

yep. time i wasted because it wasn't up to your "guide lines" ..just because he doesn't have a major belt from a major federation? It's funny because the actual has a wiki-page. Some wrestlers that work for the company have a wiki page. and because I even created the page, Look under one of the belts for the title history. Oh "Ryu Lee" was there. He technically is a professional wrestler, so you shut that mouth and if he gets into WWE & TNA you'll be crawling back to me. and I don't care why the article was deleted. Because some fool who has too much time on their hands doesn't think its required to be in there. so, again shut that mouth. Wikipedia sucks.

April 2010[edit]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at C. C. Brown, you will be blocked from editing. Eagles 24/7 (C) 02:46, 28 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Well tell him to learn how to cover people and maybe you should wake up and disrespect trash like CC brown,

PS Eagles Suck

September 2010[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Victor Cruz (American football) has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 01:23, 7 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

October 2010[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Roberto Clemente Award, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Muboshgu (talk) 01:02, 29 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

January 2014[edit]

Hello, I'm Ugog Nizdast. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Fred Cox because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Ugog Nizdast (talk) 16:46, 28 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Admr Boltz 17:07, 28 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nope. Watch the episode stupid sand nigga.