User talk:Nickliverpool

what have i done that is so innapropraite then??? tell me?

there is nothing wrong with that! you know all i do on wiki is help scoop up your shitty mistakes, so a page would be nice

Without dealing with the unanswerable bits of the above, it's "inappropriate" to create pages about yourself -- see the conflict of interest policy and the policy on autobiography -- and our notability standards with respect to the notability of athletes do not allow the creation of articles about amateur athletes who are not competing at the highest standard of amateur competition; for soccer/football, that would be playing for England, I believe, or perhaps World Cup. Alternatively, articles can be about professional athletes. In either case, the individual would have to be competing at pretty much the highest level of available competition. See WP:ATHLETE for details. Accounting4Taste:talk 21:23, 3 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

February 2010[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for spam, advertising, or promotion. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Blueboy 96 21:24, 3 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Nick broken leg.jpg[edit]

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as File:Nick broken leg.jpg, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Blueboy 96 21:25, 3 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Nick broken leg.jpg[edit]

Thank you for uploading File:Nick broken leg.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. FASTILY ^(TALK) 23:59, 3 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock request[edit]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Nickliverpool (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Igoring what i wrote below, please may i be able to edit pages again, i find it VERY boring not being able to do so!! I won't make myself a page, it was very selfish! if i get famous maybe? but not now!! if there is any kind of 'Probation' period, then i would happily comply with that!! NickLiverpool p.s looking at my history MINUS my page problem, i've done brilliant edits on a few pages! e.g Kanye west, Lemar, Stuart Atwell are just a few!

Decline reason:

Cannot confirm that anonymous edits were from the actual user. Should the actual user login to submit an unblock request, they should ensure that they cover the issues that led to the block. (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 09:15, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I would point out that the user is blocked with talk page disabled, which means he wouldn't be able to edit here even if he wanted to. Excirial^{(Contact me,Contribs)} 09:17, 6 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]