User talk:Nickwilliams45

Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse![edit]

Hello! Nickwilliams45, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us!

I, and the rest of the hosts, would be more than happy to answer any questions you have! SarahStierch (talk) 18:02, 28 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation[edit]

Amanda Sonia Berry, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you are more than welcome to continue submitting work to Articles for Creation.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

David_FLXD (Talk) 19:30, 2 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome![edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia, Nickwilliams45! Thank you for your contributions. I am David FLXD and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type {{helpme}} at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! David_FLXD (Talk) 19:32, 2 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, the above is the template welcome, this is the personal one. For a first article, Amanda Berry was exceptional. I really mean that: very, very few first articles submitted reach this standard. If you want numbers, it is something like one in 200. You must have done some study on how-to-wikipedia! Anyway, very well done. I hope you will continue to contribute. Regards, David_FLXD (Talk) 19:36, 2 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:BAFTA award.jpg)[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:BAFTA award.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Werieth (talk) 16:33, 13 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

WP:COI[edit]

Hi Nick. I see you've been focusing on BAFTA articles and that makes your edits a conflict of interest. You should, at least, place a note here somewhere that indicates that you are employed by the organisation about which you're making edits. The Rambling Man (talk) 15:23, 9 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, will do! Nickwilliams45 (talk) 16:57, 9 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

About me[edit]

I'm Nick Williams. I've worked at the British Academy of Film and Television Arts (BAFTA) since 2006, and I'm here to contribute and clarify information on Wikipedia related to BAFTA to help people's understanding of what the organisation is, what it does, and why.

There are so many pages here related to BAFTA and its awards, and most of it is great, but there are some places where the historical information in our archive and the information displayed here don't, for whatever reason, marry up. It's my job to make sure that Wikipedia is home to the most reliable and accurate information on BAFTA on the web, definitely not to pass comment or judgement on its work or indeed censor the views of others. I'm just here to help with the consistency of some of the naming conventions used across the site, for example, and contribute to a fuller and better informed background of BAFTA on the web.

I don't have much experience with Wikipedia so it's a steep learning curve for me; if you've got any questions about the changes I'm making or suggesting, please don't hesitate to contact me.

You can find my details at www.bafta.org/press/press-contact-details.

Nickwilliams45 (talk) 16:57, 9 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reference errors on 16 March[edit]

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

On the British Academy of Film and Television Arts page, your edit caused a URL error (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:30, 17 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]