User talk:Nidhishunnikrishnan

July 2014[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. At least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to Garuda Purana, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at the welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Sreeking (talk) 11:59, 9 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This was a confusion, and has since been clarified.Nidhishunnikrishnan (talk) 22:14, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 11[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Thumbolarcha, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page G. K. Pillai. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:22, 11 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This has been rectified. Nidhishunnikrishnan (talk) 22:13, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

December 2022[edit]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at common ostrich. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. UtherSRG (talk) 17:19, 13 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

That was an edit in good faith. The word "strouthos" does mean "sparrow" in Greek (from which the Latin cognate derives), as you can see even on Wiktionary itself. https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/ostrich

Translating "ostrich" as "ostrich" (as it was originally in the article) doesn't serve any useful purpose; I don't see why this isn't obvious. Nidhishunnikrishnan (talk) 17:32, 13 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Given the sizes of the birds, isn't it obvious how it isn't obvious? :) I'll revert myself. - UtherSRG (talk) 17:35, 13 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ahh I see that now. :) Thanks, anyway. Nidhishunnikrishnan (talk) 17:44, 13 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No Plan B (novel) moved to draftspace[edit]

Thanks for your contributions to No Plan B (novel). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Significa liberdade (talk) 00:32, 12 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: No Plan B (novel) (October 25)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:No Plan B (novel) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 18:08, 25 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Nidhishunnikrishnan! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 18:08, 25 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:No Plan B (novel)[edit]

Hello, Nidhishunnikrishnan. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:No Plan B (novel), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:08, 19 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]