User talk:Niyati Gupta

Ravi Mehrotra moved to draftspace[edit]

Thanks for your contributions to Ravi Mehrotra. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it needs more sources to establish notability and it is promotional and reads like an advertisement. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Thilsebatti (talk) 03:39, 16 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Ravi Mehrotra[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Ravi Mehrotra, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Jamiebuba (talk) 13:06, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse![edit]

Hello! Niyati Gupta, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:15, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Ravi Mehrotra has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Ravi Mehrotra. Thanks! UtherSRG (talk) 18:29, 24 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

August 2023[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for advertising or promotion.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

UtherSRG (talk) 14:12, 25 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Niyati Gupta (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I have taken the time to thoroughly review Wikipedia's policies and guidelines during the period of my account's block. This has given me a better understanding of the high standards expected within the community. I am dedicated to strictly adhering to these standards moving forward to ensure that my contributions are valuable, neutral, properly sourced, and respectful of the collaborative nature of the platform.

In light of my learning and commitment to improvement, I kindly request the opportunity to have my account unblocked. I genuinely believe that my future contributions can be constructive and in line with Wikipedia's guidelines. I assure you that I will exercise caution, seek guidance when needed, and actively participate in discussions to ensure the accuracy and quality of content.

I appreciate your time and consideration in reviewing my appeal. If there are any specific conditions or probationary periods associated with unblocking my account, I am more than willing to comply with them. Please feel free to ask any questions or seek additional information that would aid in your decision-making process. Niyati Gupta (talk) 05:16, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining this request because it seems to have been written by an AI. You are blocked, not an AI, so we want to hear from you. Please write a request in your own words, and be specific- tell us what you did wrong, what you will do differently, and what contributions you wish to make. This should include discussion of any connection you have with the subject of your edits(which you must have since you took a picture of him). 331dot (talk) 13:01, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

As I am the blocking admin, I shall not formally decline this request, but from my experience, you have failed to appeal in a manner that will be successful. Please read and understand the Guide to appealing blocks while you are waiting for another admin to formally reply. - UtherSRG (talk) 10:39, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Niyati Gupta (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Sorry for the incovenience, I appologize for my mistake. I have understood that my account was blocked because I have been using Wikipedia for promoting and advertising purpose which was not my intention. Actually, I was trying to add some information about a successful person in the category of scientist which would motivate people to do something great in their lives that will not only increase their own knowledge but will also help the country to develop. I kindly request you to unblock my account so that I can amend the mistakes and work on my skills as a result of which my article can be a contribution to wikipedia.

Decline reason:

I will now evaluate your request on the merits. Please read conflict of interest. If you are compensated by your mentor in any manner(it doesn't have to be money, it can be something like a grade, consideration for a job, experience to put on a resume, etc.), the Terms of Use require you to make a paid editing disclosure. Please read WP:BOSS and have your mentor read it too. We prefer to call the content of the encyclopedia articles, and not the broader term "pages". This is an important distinction. Our articles are typically written by independent editors wholly unconnected with the subject in any way. Those article summarize what independent reliable sources with significant coverage have chosen on their own to say about the topic, showing how it meets the special Wikipedia definition of a notable person or in this case a notable academic. What you describe as your purpose here is considered promotional; Wikipedia is not merely for telling the world about something good. You won't be unblocked to, at this time, edit about the professor. If that is your only goal here, this is the end of the road. If you want to first edit about other topics as a general contributor, please tell what those might be. I am declining your request. 331dot (talk) 12:24, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

.

You took a picture of Professor Mehrotra, so how do you know him? 331dot (talk) 08:55, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have been assigned this task by my mentor Amitesh Kumar Sharma whose collaborates with Professor Mehrotra. They both have published research papers together, whose link are attached herewith.

1. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30264759/

2. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31347432/

3. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29505798/

4. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29037125/

So, Professor has asked him to write his Wikipedia page and if you required any kind of information then we can approach him. Here, is the official website of Professor which was made by my mentor Amitesh Kumar Sharma from where you can get contacts him.

http://ravimehrotra.co.in/ Niyati Gupta (talk) 12:14, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Niyati Gupta (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I Niyati Gupta confess that there are no such type of verbal or written agreements regarding any type of job, stipend, or experience to put on a resume, etc. I have read their resumes and papers with literature that found Prof. Ravi Mehrotra is a noble person to be on Wikipedia and he deserves that. I request you that please guide me if I am wrong in any steps to publish that page. I would like to create more pages and support the Wikipedia community. It is a pleasure for me that I have learned these things and am trying to publish noble person. Please guide me on how can i do the next process. Please unblock me to create the new pages on Wikipedia.

Decline reason:

You have a conflict of interest. You will not be unblocked to do this. Yamla (talk) 12:29, 23 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

So you weren't asked to do this by your mentor? 331dot (talk) 15:43, 7 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Because my mentor is directly connected to Prof Ravi Mehrotra and when he discussed him with me, we both thought of bringing his information on Wikipedia. Niyati Gupta (talk) 12:04, 8 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

As I have already stated the genuine reason of creating the Wikipedia page of Prof Ravi Mehrotra, So kindly consider the request to unblock my account. Niyati Gupta (talk) 10:00, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Admins are volunteers, doing what they can when they can. Please be patient. 331dot (talk) 15:48, 18 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to humbly request you to please unblock my account as I have already appealed for unblock. Niyati Gupta (talk) 11:26, 7 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I would request you to please unblock my account so that I can edit and contribute to Wikipedia. Its a humble request from my end. Niyati Gupta (talk) 16:57, 10 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

December 2023[edit]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. In addition, your ability to edit your talk page has also been revoked.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then submit a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. UtherSRG (talk) 18:26, 10 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]