User talk:Njeremijenko

Welcome!

Hello, Njeremijenko, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Sceptr e ^(Talk) 23:23, 31 December 2005 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:Logo transa.gif[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Logo transa.gif. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 12:07, 17 January 2007 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Weisure[edit]

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Weisure, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Non-notable neologism

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Jvr725 (talk) 05:55, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Re. your article[edit]

Hello! In my experience, most text of the level at which you write combined with a lack of wiki markings almost always resolves back to some other site in the course of a Google search. I reviewed the log; yours is in fact original and I apologize for the error. Another editor had tagged it for deletion before I deleted it, possibly for the same reason.

The problem is that of style. It's brilliantly detailed, but comes off as more of an essay than an encyclopedia article and should be written to appeal to a general audience as opposed to a scholarly one. In all honesty, I wish more scholars would contribute.

In cases like this, I often suggest building the article via a user subpage, like this: User:Njeremijenko/Lifestyle experiments. You can rewrite the text to conform to the site's style (outlined at WP:MOS) and when it's done, you can simply paste the text back to Lifestyle experiments.

I've pasted the last version of the article to the subpage so that you don't have to recreate it. Thank you very much for your contribution. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 17:36, 6 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]