User talk:Nk3play2/Archive 4
 | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 | Archive 6 | → | Archive 10 |
Reliable sources
Per your additions to the List of fictional supercouples, newsblaze.com, soaps.sheknows.com and even soapoperasource.com are not considered WP:Reliable sources (although soapoperasource.com is debatable). While soaps.com is acceptable for news and interviews, the survey you keep adding is not...per Talk:List of fictional supercouples#soaps.com Survey Results for Favorite Supercouple of All time. Also, try not to add any and every couple referred to as a supercouple, per concerns expressed on the list talk page about that.
Daytimeconfidential and buddytv.com are generally acceptable for soap opera information, although Daytimeconfidential is sometimes debated in the same vein as soapoperasource.com. Flyer22 (talk) 15:23, 7 August 2011 (UTC)
- Hey, Nk3play2, just letting you know that your couples were removed by Sparrowhawkseven. This is being discussed at User talk:Sparrowhawkseven#Content must be from reliable sources. Flyer22 (talk) 18:26, 10 August 2011 (UTC)
I've gone ahead and removed your hidden comments and point of view used as a reference in the above noted article. While I concur with your statement that Peter Manning and Irene Manning were siblings, the proper response is not through edit warring to make your assertions. In the future, please support your assertions using a citation to a reliable source. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me. Best regards, Cind.amuse (Cindy) 20:06, 10 August 2011 (UTC)
Lucky and Elizabeth merge
Hi, I saw that a supercouple page was created for Lucky and Liz and they are also still on the page for minor GH couples. I wanted to move the more in depth information on them onto their supercouple page, but I didn't want to just delete the work that was already there, so I was wondering how you wanted to merge the two pages? Sparrowhawkseven (talk) 03:16, 13 August 2011 (UTC)
Improving the Sonny Corinthos and Brenda Barrett page
I had to revert an edit of this page, and since you are still doing the supercouple pages. I was wondering if you could watch the page. Jester66 (talk) 06:24, 24 August 2011 (UTC)
File source problem with File:Sarah_Brown-Carly_Benson_GH.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Sarah_Brown-Carly_Benson_GH.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.
If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.
Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. feydey (talk) 09:34, 10 September 2011 (UTC)
Tea Delgado
Please do not clutter infoboxes up as you did here. You write it in simple form. You are aware of all the trouble that page as had - yet you still did it - resulting in full protection - which suggests to me you are trying to be disruptive.RaintheOne BAM 13:25, 21 August 2011 (UTC)
- Well I was reverting your edit because you stemmed the marriage durations out again. I'd also like to point out that Starr should be listed as a step-daughter because they were married once before - which means she was her step mother at one point. We go by the whole duration. When the article is off protection Jack, Sam and (daughter) can be removed. If you'd also provide edit summaries, then it would be easier to know what your thinking - we'd of avoided this misunderstanding. :pRaintheOne BAM 13:42, 22 August 2011 (UTC)
I've asked you to stop cluttering infoboxes up. You do not indicate whether a character is alive or dead in the infobox because as a character they will always exist.RaintheOne BAM 13:19, 18 September 2011 (UTC)
Soap Articles in Trouble!
Hey Nk3play2, I wanted to let you know, since I enjoy your contributions and intent on improving all soap articles, that the user User:Gh87 is intentionally nominating hundreds (literally, hundreds) of soap character articles for deletion. In the past week, his grueling mistreatment has spread throughout the AMC characters most of all and has been trying to delete GL, ATWT, OLTL, DAYS, Santa Barbara, Sunset Beach (etc) characters nd history articles. He is also deleting images, all of which users have spent countless hours working on that he/she wants to delete due to "lack of notability". Just look at the contribution page - it is literally sickening at what he/she is doing. Account and IP users have tried to help but he bosses everyone around and gets admins on his side when others try to save the articles. Please help save these articles because I know you appreciate and love the soap world. Please spread the word to other users to participate in deletion discussions to save them. Again, please help and spread the word. Otherwise, users no longer have any articles to contribute for after he/she deletes them.149.4.204.17 (talk) 15:40, 11 October 2011 (UTC)
WikiProject Soap Operas alert
As a member of the Wikipedia:WikiProject Soap Operas, and in accordance with the appropriate notification in deference to canvassing, I am alerting your attention to several current discussions for deletion pertaining to soap opera characters. This is an invitation to participate in the discussion. Best regards, Cind.amuse (Cindy) 20:22, 12 October 2011 (UTC)
Nomination of Dante Falconeri and Lulu Spencer for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dante Falconeri and Lulu Spencer is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dante Falconeri and Lulu Spencer until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. RaintheOne BAM 23:10, 16 October 2011 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Tara Martin.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Tara Martin.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 03:21, 19 October 2011 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Dante Lulu.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Dante Lulu.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
PLEASE NOTE:
- I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a {{helpme}} template, along with your question, beneath this message.
- I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
- If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
- To opt out of these bot messages, add
{{bots|deny=DASHBot}}to your talk page. - If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.
Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 18:04, 24 October 2011 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Pete Cortlandt.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Pete Cortlandt.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
PLEASE NOTE:
- I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a {{helpme}} template, along with your question, beneath this message.
- I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
- If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
- To opt out of these bot messages, add
{{bots|deny=DASHBot}}to your talk page. - If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.
Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 18:47, 6 November 2011 (UTC)
Nomination of Asher Pike for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Asher Pike is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Asher Pike until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Wlmg (talk) 04:36, 7 November 2011 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Asher Pike.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Asher Pike.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
PLEASE NOTE:
- I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a {{helpme}} template, along with your question, beneath this message.
- I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
- If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
- To opt out of these bot messages, add
{{bots|deny=DASHBot}}to your talk page. - If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.
Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:41, 15 November 2011 (UTC)
The article Claire Walsh has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Braincricket (talk) 05:20, 12 December 2011 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Michael Corinthos.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Michael Corinthos.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 06:53, 24 December 2011 (UTC)