User talk:NoErr

Image tagging for Image:Coxless-pair.gif[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Coxless-pair.gif. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 16:07, 14 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image tagging for Image:Coxless-pair.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Coxless-pair.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 17:06, 14 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Socket G2[edit]

This is an automated message from VWBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Socket G2, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.cpu-world.com/Sockets/Socket%20G2%20(rPGA988B).html.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) VWBot (talk) 18:07, 5 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Socket G3 cancelled[edit]

This is an automated message from VWBot. I have performed a search with the contents of Socket G3 cancelled, and it appears to be very similar to another Wikipedia page: Socket G3. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case. If you are intentionally trying to rename an article, please see Help:Moving a page for instructions on how to do this without copying and pasting. If you are trying to move or copy content from one article to a different one, please see Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia and be sure you have acknowledged the duplication of material in an edit summary to preserve attribution history.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. VWBot (talk) 18:34, 5 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you![edit]

	The Original Barnstar
	For the tedious work of creating processor tables at Haswell (microarchitecture) Thue (talk) 18:59, 5 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Socket G3[edit]

When moving pages you need to use the Move function to preserve the history of the article (which is required by the GFDL and CC-BY-SA 3.0 licenses that Wikipedia uses. If you don't then it is a copyright violation (hence the bot warnings above). I have fixed it by doing the following:

Deleted Socket G3 cancelled because it was a copyright violation
Moved "Socket G3" to "AMD Socket G3" (because most of the history was concerning the AMD socket)
Copy/pasted the content relevant to the Intel version to a new article, Intel Socket G3, and in the edit summary attributed it to you (as required by the licenses)
Because Socket G3 was left empty by the move I created a disambiguation page there.

I just thought I'd let you know what I've done because it might appear confusing. Regards, James086 ^Talk 19:23, 5 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Zdenko Domančić moved to draftspace[edit]

An article you recently created, Zdenko Domančić, is not suitable as written to remain published. It appears there is a WP:UPE or WP:COI conflict. Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, and have addressed the UPE/COI issue, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. As per WP policy, please do not move into mainspace yourself. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:09, 5 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:People from Ugljan[edit]

A tag has been placed on Category:People from Ugljan indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:10, 23 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Zdenko Domančić (July 7)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by InterstellarGamer12321 was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Because this is a WP:BLP article, all statements and claims should be backed up with inline citations to reliable sources. There are currently several unreferenced paragraphs in the article. Inline citations to reliable sources should be added or unverifiable information should be removed.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Zdenko Domančić and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

InterstellarGamer12321 (talk | contribs) 15:34, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, NoErr! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! InterstellarGamer12321 (talk | contribs) 15:34, 7 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:30, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Zdenko Domančić[edit]

Hello, NoErr. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Zdenko Domančić, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:06, 7 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]