User talk:NotWith/Archive 4

This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Archive 1

Archive 2

Archive 3

Archive 4

Archive 5

Archive 6

Disambiguation link notification for January 7

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Tomzanonia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Dod (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:04, 7 January 2014 (UTC)

Orchid anatomy

Hi, bearing in mind that Plant anatomy is about microscopic structures, your recent category additions seem to belong in [[Category:Orchid morphology]]. Best wishes, Sminthopsis84 (talk) 20:06, 20 January 2014 (UTC)

Thanks. --NotWith (talk) 14:29, 21 January 2014 (UTC)

January 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Piperia elongata may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

[[[[Category:Orchids of the United States]]

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 15:30, 5 January 2014 (UTC)

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Caladenia carnea may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s and 1 "[]"s likely mistaking one for another. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

often rely on mycorrhizal fungi in the native soil.<ref>The Australasian Native Orchid Society [Qld) – Kabi Group Inc [http://www.ourshopfront.com/kabi/Natives/Caladenia%20carnea.php (Caladenia
[[Category:Orchid type species])

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 14:40, 15 January 2014 (UTC)

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Habenaria rhodocheila may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

[[Category:Orchids of the Philippines]]]]

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 20:23, 24 January 2014 (UTC)

Italic title template

Hi, this template is not needed with {{Speciesbox}}, which supplies it. Also when it is needed before a taxobox, it is generally important NOT to include a newline between it and the taxobox template, otherwise you get an extra blank line at the start of the article. Peter coxhead (talk) 10:15, 26 January 2014 (UTC)

Tabernaemontana pandacaqui geographic categories

Hello NotWith, I've reverted your recent category change to Tabernaemontana pandacaqui. The plant is described as a "shrub or tree" so the "Flora of" categories seem more appropriate than the narrower "Trees of" categories which might not capture the "shrubbiness". Declan Declangi (talk) 05:10, 2 February 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Urolithin, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Colon (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:05, 10 February 2014 (UTC)

Balansae listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Balansae. Since you had some involvement with the Balansae redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Declangi (talk) 10:52, 12 February 2014 (UTC)

February 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Dehydroaltenusin may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

[Category:Polyphenols]]

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 10:01, 14 February 2014 (UTC)

Category:Greek and Latin words found in species names

Category:Greek and Latin words found in species names, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. DexDor (talk) 05:49, 28 February 2014 (UTC)

Category:Spiders by country

Category:Spiders by country, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. DexDor (talk) 05:23, 2 March 2014 (UTC)

Sockpuppet ?

Hi, have you ever editted using any other accounts in a way that might be construed to be an attempt to avoid WP:SCRUTINY. If so, please place a note on the user page of all your accounts linking to the other account(s). An explanation for any use of multiple accounts might also be helpful. DexDor (talk) 15:13, 2 March 2014 (UTC)

March 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Sitticus floricola may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

[[Category:Fauna of the United Kingdom]]]]

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 15:45, 2 March 2014 (UTC)

Autopatrolled rights

Hi NotWith! I notice you create a lot of articles. Have you considered requesting autopatrolled rights? This would save new page patrollers from having to review all of your newly created articles. Anyway, just some food for thought. -Iago Qnsi 05:41, 9 March 2014 (UTC)

Category:Biota of Overseas departments and territories of France

Category:Biota of Overseas departments and territories of France, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. DexDor (talk) 20:51, 15 March 2014 (UTC)

Spiders!

Hello! I'm not sure if you're computer program or just a very dedicated spider enthusiast (or the latter using the former), but many of your recent spider additions have no references, simply links to external sources or no source whatsoever. While there are certainly many species of invertebrate lacking coverage, please keep WP:VERIFY in mind, one of Wikipedia's 3 Core Content Policies. Also, please consider adding a WikiProject Spiders template ({{WPSpiders}}) to the talk page of your stubs, to help the project manage, keep track of, and most importantly, improve articles on spiders. --Animalparty-- (talk) 00:23, 16 March 2014 (UTC)

Category:Moths of Andorra

Category:Moths of Andorra, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. DexDor (talk) 13:41, 16 March 2014 (UTC)

Category:Species common name disambiguation pages

Category:Species common name disambiguation pages, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. DexDor (talk) 22:01, 16 March 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 31

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Dux Belgicae secundae, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Metis (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:53, 31 March 2014 (UTC)

Category:Mammals of Metropolitan France

Category:Mammals of Metropolitan France, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 11:06, 18 April 2014 (UTC)

Category:Moths of Metropolitan France

Category:Moths of Metropolitan France, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. DexDor (talk) 13:39, 18 April 2014 (UTC)

Invitation join the new Physiology Wikiproject!

Based on the long felt gap for categorization and improvization of WP:MED articles relating to the field of physiology, the new WikiProject Physiology has been created. WikiProject Physiology is still in its infancy and needs your help. On behalf of a group of editors striving to improve the quality of physiology articles here on Wikipedia, I would like to invite you to come on board and participate in the betterment of physiology related articles. Help us to jumpstart this WikiProject.

Feel free to leave us a message at any time on the WikiProkect Physiology talk page. If you are interested in joining the project yourself, there is a participant list where you can sign up. Please leave a message on the talk page if you have any problems, suggestions, would like review of an article, need suggestions for articles to edit, or would like some collaboration when editing!
You can tag the talk pages of relevant articles with {{WikiProject Physiology|class=|importance=}} with your assessment of the article class and importance alongwith. Please note that WP:Physiology, WP:Physio, WP:Phy can be used interchangeably.
You will make a big difference to the quality of information by adding reliable sources. Sourcing physiology articles is essential and makes a big difference to the quality of articles. And, while you're at it, why not use a book to source information, which can source multiple articles at once!
We try and use a standard way of arranging the content in each article. That layout is here. These headings let us have a standard way of presenting the information in anatomical articles, indicate what information may have been forgotten, and save angst when trying to decide how to organise an article. That said, this might not suit every article. If in doubt, be bold!
Why not try and strive to create a good article! Physiology related articles are often small in scope, have available sources, and only a limited amount of research available that is readily presentable!
Your contributions to the WikiProject page, related categories and templates is also welcome.
To invite other editors to this WikiProject, copy and past this template (with the signature):
- {{subst:WP Physiology–invite}} ~~~~
To welcome editors of physiology articles, copy and past this template (with the signature):
- {{subst:WP Physiology–welcome}} ~~~~
You can feel free to contact us on the WikiProkect Physiology talk page if you have any problems, or wish to join us. You can also put your suggestions there and discuss the scope of participation.

Hoping for your cooperation! Diptanshu^Talk 12:50, 27 April 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Platidic

Hello NotWith,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Platidic for deletion, because it doesn't appear to contain any encyclopedic content. Take a look at our suggestions for essential content in short articles to learn what should be included.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Jhona43 (talk) 09:11, 29 April 2014 (UTC)

May 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Bleeding Canker of Horse Chestnut may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

| hosts = chestnut trees (''[[Aesculus hippocastanum]]''

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 11:55, 4 May 2014 (UTC)

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Peniophora sacrata may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s and 1 "[]"s likely mistaking one for another. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

* [[List of apple diseases])

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 11:44, 8 May 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 9

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Meloidogyne fruglia (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to African daisy

Meloidogyne gajuscus (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to African daisy

Pestalotia longisetula (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Fruit rot

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:54, 9 May 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 16

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Phyllosticta alliariaefoliae, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bellflower (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:52, 16 May 2014 (UTC)

Category:Freshwater fish of Metropolitan France

Category:Freshwater fish of Metropolitan France, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 22:39, 18 May 2014 (UTC)

Category:Damselflies of Metropolitan France

Category:Damselflies of Metropolitan France, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. DexDor (talk) 18:41, 19 May 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 6

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Fomitiporia mediterranea, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Michael Fischer (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:57, 6 June 2014 (UTC)

Wikispecies is not a reliable source.

Please do not use Wikispecies as a reference, ever. Like Wikipedia, it can be edited by anyone at any time, and thus is not a reliable source. For instance, you used apparently used Wikispecies as a reference in Aterpini, which in turns references Oberprieler, 2010 which, since it was published , dated, and unalterable, would be a much better source to cite, assuming it verifies the information in the wiki article. At the same time, you should never cite Wikipedia on Wikipedia, since the article cited may not have the information when someone refers to it at a later date. Ask me on my talk page if you have any questions. Cheers, --Animalparty-- (talk) 02:23, 9 June 2014 (UTC)

Amycterini

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Amycterini, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.scientificlib.com/en/Biology/Animalia/Arthropoda//Insects/Amycterini.html.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 04:15, 9 June 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 17

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Gene silencing pesticide, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bollworm (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:54, 17 June 2014 (UTC)

Category:Beetles of Metropolitan France

Category:Beetles of Metropolitan France, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. DexDor (talk) 20:34, 24 June 2014 (UTC)

Category:Lepidoptera of Metropolitan France

Category:Lepidoptera of Metropolitan France, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. DexDor (talk) 21:26, 24 June 2014 (UTC)

Category:Fish of Liechtenstein

Category:Fish of Liechtenstein, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. DexDor (talk) 06:00, 2 July 2014 (UTC)

July 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Adela repetitella may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s and 1 "[]"s likely mistaking one for another. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

[[Category:Moths of Europe])

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 08:35, 6 July 2014 (UTC)

"Evolutionary history of"

I'd never seen the logic of having articles at titles like "Evolutionary history of plants" as opposed to "Evolution of plants" – evolution necessarily operates over time, so is intrinsically historical in this sense. So I applaud your move. But what about Evolutionary history of life? Surely this should also be moved? Peter coxhead (talk) 08:25, 12 August 2014 (UTC)

Move

Is there a reason why you moved the page Evolutionary history of lemurs without discussing it first? I feel many things about the article, including the title were probably well-vetted during its FAC... – Maky ^« talk » 06:09, 13 August 2014 (UTC)

Thanks for your moves

Many thanks for being bold in bringing sanity to the naming of articles about evolution of taxa!--cyclopia ^speak! 09:34, 13 August 2014 (UTC)

Nomination of Maculata for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Maculata is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maculata until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. The Banner talk 09:53, 23 August 2014 (UTC)

Category:Reptiles of Metropolitan France

Category:Reptiles of Metropolitan France, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. DexDor (talk) 20:02, 29 August 2014 (UTC)

Categorization of plant taxa

Hi, the system for categorizing plant taxa is complicated (too complicated in my view, but I didn't invent it!). It's described at Wikipedia:WikiProject_Plants/Categorization. Category:Boryaceae, for example, does not belong in Category:Asparagales families. Only the article Boryaceae belongs in Category:Asparagales families as well as in Category:Asparagales. Peter coxhead (talk) 22:05, 5 September 2014 (UTC)

Also, consider Category:Oxyanthus. Rather than putting this category into Category:Ixoroideae, really the articles in the category should be re-categorized as Category:Ixoroideae and Category:Oxyanthus marked for deletion since it's too small (10 seems a possible minimum size, although some regard this as too small). Peter coxhead (talk) 22:14, 5 September 2014 (UTC)

Category question

Hi, could you perhaps enlighten me what the difference is between "mouse genes" and "Genes mutated in mice", I'm a bit at a loss here... --Randykitty (talk) 09:47, 11 August 2014 (UTC)

Here the small intro in the catagoey "Genes mutated in mice" : Genes that have been mutated in the germline of a mouse; including those genetically engineered in knock out mice, those disrupted by random mutagenesis and spontaneously acquired mutations. Cheers. --NotWith (talk) 09:51, 11 August 2014 (UTC)

I guess that's what I expected. So that's what mutated genes are. I don't think that definition leaves a single gene for the "mouse genes" category... --Randykitty (talk) 09:59, 11 August 2014 (UTC)

Any further thoughts on this? --Randykitty (talk) 13:48, 1 September 2014 (UTC)

Anybody home? --Randykitty (talk) 10:30, 6 September 2014 (UTC)

Category redirection

Unfortunately, categories cannot be redirected. See WP:CATRED. Another of those irritating Wikipedia technicalities! Peter coxhead (talk) 07:54, 20 September 2014 (UTC)

Categorization of plant articles

Hi, I'm afraid that you've been categorizing plant articles incorrectly, albeit doubtless in good faith. First, see the note at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Plants#Taxonomy categories. Second, obsolete taxa, like Diplophragma should be put into a (sub)category of Category:Historically recognized angiosperm taxa.

Additionally, obsolete taxa don't have a taxobox, and at the level of genus or species generally shouldn't have an article, but be just a redirect to the currently accepted name. Peter coxhead (talk) 19:52, 9 September 2014 (UTC)

Note that categories should not be created unless they will contain at least 10 items (other categories or articles) or, exceptionally, clearly have the potential to contain many items (e.g. a large genus with few species articles yet written might warrant its own category). Peter coxhead (talk) 09:38, 11 September 2014 (UTC)

For example "Monotypic Urticaceae genera" is never going to be a large enough group to justify a separate category. Peter coxhead (talk) 08:01, 20 September 2014 (UTC)

Question

More than a month ago I left a category question here (above). I'd appreciate an answer. Thanks. --Randykitty (talk) 13:14, 20 September 2014 (UTC)

Classification of monotypic taxa

There is a consensus that a genus article (like Sarcobatus, which we both recently categorized) is classified into both a taxonomic category (in this case Category:Caryophyllales) and a "TAXON genus" category (in this case Category:Caryophyllales genera). However, I can't find any agreement anywhere about the "monotypic" categories. Sometimes an article about a monotypic genus is categorized three ways: a "TAXON" category, a "TAXON genera" category, and a "Monotypic TAXON genera" category, other times the "TAXON genera" category is left off.

Do you know if this is explained anywhere? Is there a rationale for either choice? Peter coxhead (talk) 10:37, 21 September 2014 (UTC)

Removing taxon categories

When you add a category "TAXON genera", you shouldn't remove the plain "TAXON" category. For example, Parasitaxus should be in both Category:Podocarpaceae and Category:Podocarpaceae genera. This is clearly explained at WP:PLANTS#Articles and in more detail at WP:PLANTS/Categorization. Peter coxhead (talk) 07:16, 24 September 2014 (UTC)

You are still removing taxon categories. Please STOP! Peter coxhead (talk) 19:08, 27 September 2014 (UTC)

@Peter coxhead:, I have found that User:NotWith rarely replies to queries about editing behavior. This is frustrating and complicates collaboration and providing feedback for the editor. I've noticed this trend over many years, where NotWith will be asked to alter editing patterns with categories and fails to acknowledge or change the way s/he edits. In this instance, the behavior is disruptive and frequent enough to not be simple mistakes. NotWith has been asked to stop and provided a clear explanation. @NotWith:, if you do not stop removing taxon categories while running through the "Fooaceae genera" categories, you will be blocked from editing for a short time, not as a punitive measure but to protect the project from further disruptive edits. Peter, I will give NotWith some time to comply with this, but if you notice any further edits of this nature, let me know and I will apply the block. Thanks, Rkitko ^(talk) 23:41, 27 September 2014 (UTC)

September 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Petagnaea may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

[Category:Endemic flora of Sicily]]

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 17:36, 13 September 2014 (UTC)

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Homoisoflavonoid may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

[[3,9-dihydro-autumnalin]] can be found in ''[[Eucomis autumnalis]]''.<ref>The homo-isoflavones II1). Isolation and structure of 4′-o-methyl-punctatin, autumnalin and 3,9-dihydro-autumnalin. W.T.L.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 06:25, 28 September 2014 (UTC)

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Eucomis autumnalis may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

Legumes]], [[:Category:Edible plants]], and so on. See the subcategories under [[:Category:Plants]]); most of the subcategories listed there have lower-level subcategories that may fit better.
] and [[3,9-dihydro-autumnalin]] can be found in ''E. autumnalis''.<ref>The homo-isoflavones II1). Isolation and structure of 4′-o-methyl-punctatin, autumnalin and 3,9-dihydro-autumnalin. W.T.L.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 06:27, 28 September 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 28

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Barnardia japonica, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Siyin. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:20, 28 September 2014 (UTC)

Creating redirects

@NotWith: Please do not create redirects that are in foreign languages, such as 棉棗兒 and 绵枣儿, redirects you created that had Barnardia japonica as their target. This is the English language Wikipedia; any foreign language names not in common use in English are inappropriate as redirects or as article content. Other language interwiki links, now stored in WikiData, are the best means to link other languages.

On a related issue, I also deleted Albo-viridis, a redirect you created that also had Barnardia japonica as its target article. I understand that this is a variety epithet included in a synonym of the target article, but without the remainder of the synonym, the redirect is meaningless. Rkitko ^(talk) 16:50, 28 September 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 6

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Nasturtium africanum, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Nasturtium (plant). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:18, 6 October 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Moths of Ukraine

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Category:Moths of Ukraine, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. DexDor (talk) 17:59, 12 October 2014 (UTC)

Gastropods by country

Hello NotWith. One big problem with this category is that it only makes a (very slight) amount of sense for non-marine gastropods, and even not very much sense for them. Marine gastropods need to be categorized by marine faunal zone, not by country (think of Europe, so many countries, many with almost identical mollusk faunas. Also, a serious error: "Africa" is not a country; it is a continent. I would very much recommend that you ask the Gastropod Project for input before you create these categories and start to populate them. Invertzoo (talk) 23:56, 19 October 2014 (UTC)

Another note

If you had read the Gastropod Project page you would have seen that we specifically requested that Mollusks of New Zealand and Mollusks of Australia be eliminated as categories, and instead become list articles, backed up with the relevant sources of course. Invertzoo (talk) 23:58, 19 October 2014 (UTC)

October 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Vanmanenia may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

[[Category:Freshwater fish of China]]]

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 06:12, 26 October 2014 (UTC)

Category:Land animals

Category:Land animals, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. DexDor (talk) 22:41, 27 October 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 28

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Odostomiinae, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Taxonomy. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:38, 28 October 2014 (UTC)

Warning

Please STOP creating inappropriate categories. There is a discussion going on about your behavior here and if you continue to create such categories without appropriate discussion, this might well end up at WP:ANI and you might be blocked from editing. You really must start communicating with other editors about your edits. Thanks. --Randykitty (talk) 16:11, 29 October 2014 (UTC)

Seconded. It is disruptive to create categories when similar ones have been deleted at cfd. (Eg Spiders of France was deleted in March 2014 and yet you created Category:Moths of Ivory Coast in Oct 2014.) Many of your category creations seem at best dubious to me. Oculi (talk) 18:25, 29 October 2014 (UTC)

You really do need to stop and discuss this, not just keep going making more and more categories that are inappropriate. Invertzoo (talk) 12:59, 30 October 2014 (UTC)

It's constructive to have disagreements about categorization with other editors. It is *not* constructive to keep on creating categories that you know are controversial as similar ones are deleted. Please join the conversations about your categories in the CFD discussions so we can discuss. RevelationDirect (talk) 00:48, 2 November 2014 (UTC)

What were you thinking?! (Do you know what "Tetrapod" means?)

In your edit of 07:11, 10 March 2014 of the Category:Birds of Israel, you changed its higher-level category from Category:Fauna of Israel to Category:Tetrapods of Israel. I just discovered this and reverted your edit using "Undo." Look up "tetrapod" in the dictionary to see why. Your User talk page indicates that you have some history of interfering with valid categories. A productive direction for your editing would be appreciated. -- Cheers, Deborahjay (talk) 21:04, 31 October 2014 (UTC)

I dont have to look at the dictionary. A look at the wikipedia article is enough to convince me that I am perfectly right on that point. Cheers --NotWith (talk) 04:28, 1 November 2014 (UTC)

Yes, scientifically "birds" are "tetrapods". The argument against having a category for tetrapods is different. Look at Category:Tetrapods by country. To be useful categories must be of a reasonable size (at least 10 entries is sometimes suggested). There aren't enough subcategories of tetrapods to make "Tetrapods of X" a viable category. All of them should be deleted, and would be I'm sure if anyone bothers to open the deletion discussion. Categorizing at the level of "Fauna of X" should be enough, although since most animals are not confined to one country, "X" should be a biogeographical region, not a country. Peter coxhead (talk) 08:04, 1 November 2014 (UTC)

Previous animals by country categories have been deleted when nominated. Clearly, some island countries are exceptions but this is not one of them. RevelationDirect (talk) 00:53, 2 November 2014 (UTC)

Category:Tetrapods by country

Category:Tetrapods by country, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. DexDor (talk) 21:24, 2 November 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Moths of Algeria

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Category:Moths of Algeria, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Kkmurray (talk) 16:14, 5 November 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Moths of Afghanistan

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Category:Moths of Afghanistan, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Kkmurray (talk) 17:13, 5 November 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Moths of Angola

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Category:Moths of Angola, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Kkmurray (talk) 17:14, 5 November 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Moths of Argentina

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Category:Moths of Argentina, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Kkmurray (talk) 17:14, 5 November 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Fish of Cape Verde

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Category:Fish of Cape Verde, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Kkmurray (talk) 19:55, 5 November 2014 (UTC)

Moths of Africa subcategories nominated for upmerging

Subcategories of Category:Moths of Africa, many of which you created, have been nominated for upmerging. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. --Kkmurray (talk) 02:11, 6 November 2014 (UTC)

Category:Arctiid moths of South America

Category:Arctiid moths of South America, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Oculi (talk) 17:35, 7 November 2014 (UTC)

Category:Plume moths of South America

Category:Plume moths of South America, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Oculi (talk) 19:30, 7 November 2014 (UTC)

Category:Tetrapods of Algeria

Category:Tetrapods of Algeria, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Oculi (talk) 19:30, 9 November 2014 (UTC)

Category:Tetrapods by year of formal description

Category:Tetrapods by year of formal description, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. DexDor (talk) 22:52, 10 November 2014 (UTC)

Sorry, NotWith

It's been a great time, I have been patrolling recent changes and ended up with this redirect to a non existent page. I tagged it under CSD G8, meanwhile, you created that page. Sorry, but how do you feel now? DSCrowned^(talk) 07:24, 25 November 2014 (UTC)

Category:Invertebrates described in 1896

Category:Invertebrates described in 1896, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Oculi (talk) 22:07, 26 November 2014 (UTC)

Category:Arthropods described in 1896

Category:Arthropods described in 1896, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Oculi (talk) 22:19, 26 November 2014 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Flora of New Britain

A tag has been placed on Category:Flora of New Britain requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for four days or more and it is not presently under discussion at Categories for discussion, or at disambiguation categories.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Declangi (talk) 10:54, 27 November 2014 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Animal anatomy

Template:Animal anatomy has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Epipelagic (talk) 21:35, 3 December 2014 (UTC)

Category:Orchids of Austria

Category:Orchids of Austria, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. DexDor (talk) 22:20, 26 January 2015 (UTC)

Category:Moths of France

Category:Moths of France, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. DexDor (talk) 21:21, 27 January 2015 (UTC)

Category:Insects of Ukraine

Category:Insects of Ukraine, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. DexDor (talk) 22:12, 9 February 2015 (UTC)

Please see

…recent comment on the confounded listing of phenols, at [1]. I look forward to your reply at that Talk page. 71.239.87.100 (talk) 05:33, 12 February 2015 (UTC)

Category:Spiders of Corsica

Category:Spiders of Corsica, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. DexDor^(talk) 06:21, 21 April 2015 (UTC)

Category:Asparagales of Metropolitan France

Category:Asparagales of Metropolitan France, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. DexDor^(talk) 21:31, 25 April 2015 (UTC)

Category:Flora of Cornwall

Category:Flora of Cornwall, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. DexDor^(talk) 22:11, 26 April 2015 (UTC)

Category:Arthropods of Italy

Category:Arthropods of Italy, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. DexDor^(talk) 16:03, 17 May 2015 (UTC)

Category:Molluscs of Portugal

Category:Molluscs of Portugal, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. DexDor^(talk) 05:18, 5 June 2015 (UTC)

Category:Reptiles of Finland

Category:Reptiles of Finland, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. DexDor^(talk) 05:43, 13 June 2015 (UTC)

Category:Arthropods of the Isle of Man

Category:Arthropods of the Isle of Man, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. DexDor^(talk) 21:27, 26 June 2015 (UTC)

Category:Moths of Oman

Category:Moths of Oman, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. DexDor^(talk) 20:53, 7 July 2015 (UTC)

Category:Prokaryotic obsolete taxonomic groups

Category:Prokaryotic obsolete taxonomic groups, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. BDD (talk) 17:46, 9 July 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:46, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Repens (disambiguation)

A tag has been placed on Repens (disambiguation) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G6 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an orphaned disambiguation page which either

disambiguates two or fewer extant Wikipedia pages and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic); or
disambiguates no (zero) extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Oiyarbepsy (talk) 07:58, 27 November 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Striatum (disambiguation)

A tag has been placed on Striatum (disambiguation) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G6 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an orphaned disambiguation page which either

disambiguates two or fewer extant Wikipedia pages and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic); or
disambiguates no (zero) extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Oiyarbepsy (talk) 20:05, 29 November 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Pulchella (disambiguation)

A tag has been placed on Pulchella (disambiguation) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G6 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an orphaned disambiguation page which either

disambiguates two or fewer extant Wikipedia pages and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic); or
disambiguates no (zero) extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Oiyarbepsy (talk) 03:16, 30 November 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Stenophylla (disambiguation)

A tag has been placed on Stenophylla (disambiguation) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G6 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an orphaned disambiguation page which either

disambiguates two or fewer extant Wikipedia pages and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic); or
disambiguates no (zero) extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Oiyarbepsy (talk) 04:12, 30 November 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Amphibia (disambiguation)

A tag has been placed on Amphibia (disambiguation) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G6 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an orphaned disambiguation page which either

disambiguates two or fewer extant Wikipedia pages and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic); or
disambiguates no (zero) extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Oiyarbepsy (talk) 04:38, 30 November 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Caudata (disambiguation)

A tag has been placed on Caudata (disambiguation) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G6 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an orphaned disambiguation page which either

disambiguates two or fewer extant Wikipedia pages and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic); or
disambiguates no (zero) extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Oiyarbepsy (talk) 04:41, 30 November 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Stolonifera (disambiguation)

A tag has been placed on Stolonifera (disambiguation) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G6 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an orphaned disambiguation page which either

disambiguates two or fewer extant Wikipedia pages and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic); or
disambiguates no (zero) extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Oiyarbepsy (talk) 04:59, 30 November 2015 (UTC)

Amphibium listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Amphibium. Since you had some involvement with the Amphibium redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Oiyarbepsy (talk) 05:06, 30 November 2015 (UTC)

Strong-smelling listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Strong-smelling. Since you had some involvement with the Strong-smelling redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Oiyarbepsy (talk) 05:19, 16 January 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Clusii

The article Clusii has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

After removing the partial title matches, there is nothing left.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Oiyarbepsy (talk) 02:42, 11 March 2016 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Hemisphaerica

The article Hemisphaerica has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Once you remove the partial title matches, there is nothing left to disambiguate

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Oiyarbepsy (talk) 03:24, 11 March 2016 (UTC)