User talk:Nstepneski1
Nstepneski1, you are invited to the Teahouse![edit]
|
Hi Nstepneski1! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:04, 19 February 2017 (UTC) |
Recent edit to Yuri on Ice[edit]
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that you removed some content from Yuri on Ice without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Materialscientist (talk) 00:54, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
Crunchyroll licenses[edit]
Hi Nstepneski1,
There is a discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Anime and manga#Ongoing edit wars over licensees on multiple articles about listing Crunchyroll as the licensee for anime titles. Please feel free to join in that conversation. Also, I want to make my opinion clear that I think Hbartlett1's edits were correct, and that Crunchyroll does hold the home video rights for many titles. The term "master licensee" means that a company holds all or most of the rights to release a title in a territory, and Crunchyroll calling themselves the "master licensee" for titles in a press release would mean they have the home media rights. Crunchyroll has announced a partnership with Funimation where Funimation will dub and distribute on DVD/Blu-ray titles that Crunchyroll has licensed [1], but Crunchyroll is still the licensee for those titles. Anyway though, please feel free to join in the discussion I linked to above. Calathan (talk) 06:28, 8 March 2017 (UTC)
Thank you for your opinion, however I cannot bring myself to believe your words. I have stated my opinion on the matter at the talk page you mentioned stating why I believe TheFarix and that Hbartlett1 is incorrect. Please, feel free to take a look. Nstepneski1 (talk) 3:29, 8 March 2017
Reverting verifiable sources[edit]
Hi there. Please refrain from removing sourced changes to content w/o first going to the talk page. A press release by Crunchyroll posted by them on a news site relevant to anime is a verifiable source. There's no reason its authenticity is suspect and absent that, it should be included per the policy on sources that claim things about themselves. If you have a reason to doubt individual pieces of the press release, those discussions should occur where appropriate, but wholesale reverting sourced additions is disruptive.
If you personally believe the press release is incorrect, absent a countervailing source, that is insufficient reason to remove the source. Please let me know if you have any questions about what I've posted above. Thank you, Lord Roem ~ (talk) 03:54, 13 March 2017 (UTC)
I understand your source but I also placed my own verifiable source regarding Monster Hunter Stories: Ride On. I know it seems confusing but your source contradicts mine. (talk) 04:09, 13 March 2017 (UTC)
- When there are two sources that contradict each other, then you are correct regarding having to have a discussion about which should be used. But for other titles where it's clear who has the 'master license' (e.g. Yuri on Ice - Crunchyroll), that should be maintained. Can we agree on that much? :) Lord Roem ~ (talk) 04:13, 13 March 2017 (UTC)
Yes, I have accepted that Crunchyroll is the licensee for Yuri On Ice, Free! season one, and the ones mentioned at Anime Expo, but article with conflicting licensee sources such as Dragon Ball Super, Monster Hunter Stories: Ride On, and those licensed by Sentai and Aniplex I'll still edit those with valid sources. Are we good? (talk) 04:21, 13 March 2017 (UTC)
