User talk:OBrasilo

Welcome! (We can't say that loudly enough!)

Here are a few links you might find helpful:

You can sign your name on talk pages and votes by typing ~~~~; our software automatically converts it to your username and the date.

If you have any questions or problems, no matter what they are, leave me a message on my talk page. Or, please come to the Wikipedia Boot Camp, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

We're so glad you're here! Perfecto 14:31, 23 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Tokyo Mew Mre Itialian version[edit]

since you know more about the itialian version, are the mews weapons the same in the italian version?

"THROUGH FIRE, JUSTICE IS SERVED!" 23:59, 12 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Question[edit]

You said in the Tokyo Mew Mew talk page that episode 48 was removed. Is that really true? I dont know anything about the Italian version so thats why I'm asking you. "THROUGH FIRE, JUSTICE IS SERVED!" 13:21, 21 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well, all I know is, that I set my VCR to record all the Tokyo Mew Mew episodes from Italia Uno (the Italian TV channel, which was airing Tokyo Mew Mew/Mew Mew: Amiche Vincenti), and episode 48 didn't get recorded, and a second Spongebob Squarepants episode got recorded instead.

Now, I'm not sure, if it's because the episode itself got removed, or because that chanenl can't keep a constant air time (and sometimes, airs the things with up to 15 minutes, or even more, of delay), so that's, why it didn't get recorded (this same thing also happened with a Mermaid Melody Pichi Pichi Pitch Italian episode, as my VCR is now recording that, seeing, how that's being aired nowadays, in the slot, where Tokyo Mew Mew used to be aired before). ;) - OBrasilo 16:23, 21 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:UNDERGAS.jpg)[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:UNDERGAS.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 04:37, 21 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Plagiarism by Green Day deleted as an attack[edit]

Please do not make personal attacks as you did at Plagiarism by Green Day. Wikipedia has a strict policy against personal attacks. Attack pages and images are not tolerated by Wikipedia and are speedily deleted. Users who continue to create or repost such pages and images, especially those in violation of our Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons policy, will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you. Dloh cierekim 15:50, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Scene07.png[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Scene07.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 04:50, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Neptune5000Login2.jpg[edit]

A tag has been placed on File:Neptune5000Login2.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Zoo Fari 02:56, 14 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

December 2009[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, we must insist that you assume good faith while interacting with other editors, which you did not on Talk:Tokyo Mew Mew‎. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. If you want to discuss something with the article, discuss it, but your comments will continue to be removed as long as you continue your pointless insults to the editors who actually contributed to and took those articles to FA/FL/FT level by calling it "butchering" and falsely claiming you made any contribution to the current articles (nothing you did remains I'm sure). As for your actual question - this is the English Wikipedia and no, the foreign language dubs are neither notable nor relevant. The non-English versions are mentioned briefly, and not given undue weight by going into excessive detail on them. No manga/anime series article of any quality goes into detail on anything other than the original Japanese and any English language versions. -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 19:51, 14 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Little Big Adventure[edit]

Hey OBrazilo! It's an honour to finally talk to you. I'm very familiar with your contributions to the LBA community and greatly appreciate it. I didn't know you were present on Wikipedia. I'm a part of the LBA community for about 2 years but a fan for much, much longer. I remember first reading your posts several years ago.

I realise these circumstances aren't particularly positive but that's life. We had problems with User:Eik Corell for quite some time already and unfortunately, we're not the only ones. The guy vandalises a variety of game-related topics. He's a crazy teenager, who believes he contributes by deleting everything in sight. He also has significant experience in edit warring. Producing trolls like him is Wikipedia's speciality.

I'm a junior user but have had a fair share of experience with Wikipedia already. It made me quite frustrated, especially as far as quarreling with administrators goes. I'm not active here anymore and people like User:Collectonian (I believe you have already met him) are the primary reason. They're like mafia that runs this sad, pathetic place.

However, I love LBA and will do everything I can to protect the LBA-related articles. For that reason, I'll be glad if you notify me whenever you can use my assistance. I will always be here - even if I'm not very active. If there's anything I can do right now (or at a later time), please write to me. It is quantity that matters on Wikipedia and support of fellow users is beneficial no matter what one tries to achieve.

I use the same nickname here and on MBN. You can either communicate with me using Wikipedia or by PM-ing me on MBN. Thanks.

OutOfTimer ^{Wanna chat?} 23:53, 14 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Oh boy, you've had problems with Collectonian as well? Look above, I keep arguing with her in her profile about Tokyo Mew Mew, since she's taking an Anglosphere-sided POV about it.

The people I have problems with right now, are User:Collectonian, User:Eik Corell, User:Rehevkor, and User:SchmuckyTheCat. All four are idiots, who go, and destroy other people's hard work, because of their opinions. Yes, Wikipedia has some policies, but one would expect people to be mature enough to actually put some of them to doubt, and not to see people here going on, how Wikipedia's policies are the Bible, and how whoever doesn't agree with them, is a blasphemere of the worst kind. This is ruining the Wikipedia seriously.

Also I think Rehevkor is Eik Corell's sockpuppet. I do re-call reading somewhere about these two before, and also opinions by several people, that they might be sock-puppets, I just can't remember, where I read this information.

Also, the problems I'm having with Collectonian - some 2-3 years ago, I, along with other people, among with user:Yume no kishi, have put a lot of work into the articles of a Japanese Anime series, Tokyo Mew Mew. Specifically, we worked a lot on the sections detailing its various international adapatation. Pass the 2-3 years, I go check the articles, and find most of it removed, with no explanation left behind. Of course, I contact Collectonian, and ask her, as of why. And I'm still trying to make her go off her damn ego-trip, as of now. Check her talk page, there's a long section of discussion between me, and her, there, on the topic, and make yourself your own opinion about t.

BTW, do you have MSN? If yes, please add me, my address is oubattler@gmail.com . BTW, I'm now known as Battler on the MBN. I recently opened a thread on the vandalism of the LBA articles by Eik Corell, and Rehevkore, there. Feel free to check it out, if you want. - OBrasilo (talk) 18:02, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive comments.
The next time you make a personal attack as you did at User talk:OBrasilo, you will be blocked for disruption. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. keep in mind your personal attacks above are public -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 19:02, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

We lack resources to stand up to these people. They spend their whole lives in here. Have you already seen this [1]? The best thing to do is just to ignore the whole situation and don't pay too much attention to Wikipedia. There's really not much else I can say. I feel really sorry for you and all your deleted contributions. I don't have to read it to know what happened. I've seen it time and again already. Wikipedia is a true phenomenon. The site has been quite successful so far but if you join the community it quickly becomes apparent that it's a swamp. To be honest, it's the most corrupted and sick environment I've ever seen on the internet. And just like you, I'm sure... I've seen a lot. Do you know there are several communities that try to sabotage Wikipedia from within? LOL It's very funny what this site managed to produce. One of a kind experience. I only wish I would be able to understand what these people do this for. I mean, don't they have a life? You join a forum or play multiplayer to learn something, meet new people and have fun. Now, look at Wikipedia... WTF is going on here? You won't find such people anywhere else. See you on MBN, dude. It was a pleasure to meet you. OutOfTimer ^{Wanna chat?} 23:37, 15 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Windows Neptune[edit]

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Windows Neptune. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Windows Neptune. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:14, 6 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppetry case[edit]

You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/OBrasilo for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. -- Collectonian (talk · contribs) 06:07, 8 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Neptune5111Login.PNG[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Neptune5111Login.PNG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 07:40, 9 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Neptune5000Login.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Neptune5000Login.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore will not be able to answer your questions.

I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used once again.

If you received this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.

To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to somewhere on your talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:04, 14 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Neptune5000About.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Neptune5000About.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore will not be able to answer your questions.

I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used once again.

If you received this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.

To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to somewhere on your talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 18:54, 14 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by PatSter21 (talk • contribs) 20:48, 8 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

November 2014[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Glory to Ukraine may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

наші герої!''<ref>http://tsn.ua/ukrayina/mer-lvova-bandera-ta-shuhevich-ce-nashi-geroyi.html</ref> (most commonly used in [[L'viv]] - [[Stepan Bandera|Bandera]], [[Roman Shukhevych|Shukhevych]] are

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 17:27, 3 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

January 2015[edit]

Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit of yours to the page Glory to Ukraine has an edit summary that appears to be inaccurate or inappropriate. Please use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did, and feel free to use the sandbox for any tests you may want to do.
Also note that blatant WP:ADVOCACY through WP:OR involving YouTube footage in order to refactor an article into a WP:COATRACK is tendentious editing. Iryna Harpy (talk) 02:52, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't even attempt. You and your mates such as L'vivs'ke, have unilaterally declared all Russian-language sources to be automatically unraliable. Now please show me one single Wikipedia guideline that clearly says so. Though I will concede that you are right on the YouTube footage, however I would still like any evidence that would prove the YouTube footage is fake or manipulate or in any other way dishonest.

And before you try anything, let me tell you that I've been to Ukraine myself, multiple times, I've been to both the Odessa oblast' as well as to West Ukrainian places such as L'viv, and I have personally experienced people in West Ukraine turning their backs on myself and others traveling with me if we dared speak Russian to them.

Oh, and I live in Slovenia, EU, and have Slovenian citizenship, so I am definitely not any kind of paid Kremlin man.

I also speak both Russian and enough Ukrainian to understand news reports from both sides and read what people say in the respective social media, so I am fully well informed about what's going on in Ukraine. I have even seen live streams from both sides showing events such as the Odessa May 2nd massacre, so people stop attempting to push your pro-Ukrainian POV. I would recommend that sensitive articles about the on-going crisis in Ukraine, as well as on other related topics such as the "Glory to Ukraine" slogan, be managed by neutral people rather than by either pro-Ukrainians like you or pro-Russians like me, because as things are right now, the pro-Ukrainian POV pushing and anti-Russian discrimination perpetrated by people like you is making all those articles worse than they should be.

If this pushing does not stop, I am going to bring it to ANI myself. - OBrasilo (talk) 09:51, 29 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

By all means, feel free to bring your WP:ASPERSIONS regarding myself and other regular contributors to a WP:ANI. Be certain to provide a strong case for your attacks based on our ethnicity. Naturally, I couldn't possibly be a neutral editor. Don't judge others based on your own character. --Iryna Harpy (talk) 22:54, 29 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Not solely based on ethnicity but also based on your own actions. Maybe, you know, reading everything I said would have made it more clear. When you declare things such as that all Russian-language sources are automatically reliable, does that not make you non-neutral? After all, it stems from your personal belief that all Russian-language sources are bad, a belief that I so far haven't seen any substantiation for outside Western mainstream media and Governments (and even then not all - Hungary and now Greece too seem to not agree with such a stance).

And no need to adopt such an offended stance. Why is it that people like you always make strong statements about anyone, viz. your unsubstantiated accusations of sockpuppetry leveled against anyway with a pro-Russian opinion (which by the way is another point against your neutrality), yet when similarly strong statements are directed at you, you get offended like it's the worst sin. Stop this and try to find a common ground instead of defending your own stance as if the world would collapse if you gave even the slightest concession. - OBrasilo (talk) 09:47, 30 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

WP:NPA and EE discretionary sanctions[edit]

Please be advised that making personal ethnicity-based accusations, without any supporting evidence, as you did here is a violation of WP:NPA policy. Also keep in mind that this subject area is covered by discretionary subjects on Eastern Europe [2] by Arbcom - please see this guidance. My very best wishes (talk) 03:13, 30 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Woah, woah, woah. Yet editors from the other side are allowed to accuse anyone with a pro-Russian opinion of sockpuppetry, all Russian-language sources as automatically unreliable, etc.? Sorry, but I've had it with the double standards of Wikipedia. - OBrasilo (talk) 09:48, 30 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

February 2017[edit]

Hello, I'm Iryna Harpy. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit to Glory to Ukraine seemed less than neutral to me, so I removed it for now. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Iryna Harpy (talk) 20:18, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to 2014 Ukrainian revolution. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Iryna Harpy (talk) 20:21, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Frankly, Iryna, that whole article, and all the other articles on the Ukraine situation, have a giant POV problem, which is to be expected when any news source not agreeing with the pro-American/pro-Ukrainian POV has been conveniently classified as not reliable... Also, I would have expected a constructive debate rather than immediate revert and accusations (to which I responded in tone), but then again, you're Ukrainian, so that's to be expected. - OBrasilo (talk) 21:58, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop making disruptive edits, as you did at 2014 Ukrainian revolution.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing.
Note, also, that you should aware of your tone. Read WP:PERSONAL. Iryna Harpy (talk) 22:16, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

So calling for a review of the article in accordance with Wikipedia's NPOV policy is disruptive editing? Since when? Please calm down and discuss this rationally or else I am taking this incident to the ANI board. - OBrasilo (talk) 22:20, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

By all means, feel free to take it to the ANI. --Iryna Harpy (talk) 22:22, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]