User talk:OGfromtheGut

Nikki Phoenix article[edit]

Thanks so much for putting this article back up! Could you please check it and remove anything you think is fluff or too autobiographical? I would like to get the warning at the top removed that was put up by another editor, but am glad to see that the article survived notability from his check also! Thanks so much!! art javier —Preceding undated comment added 19:10, 4 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

JasonFX article[edit]

Hi, just read this article. I'm a bit concerned about it because it doesn't cite any non-self-published sources (that the designer didn't write).

People who have Wikipedia articles on them need to be 'notable'. That's a link to a guide, but basically it means covered in the media or in reliable sources they didn't write. Are there any news articles or website features on this person available? I'm concerned since the article may get deleted if not.

If so just edit the article and add citations using the cite tool. If you've got any questions just reply below this and I'll try to get back to you. Blythwood (talk) 07:54, 23 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Thanks for the heads up, I'm a little bit new in here and was concerned about the notability after reading all the guidelines. However, I will try to get even more references. OGfromtheGut (talk) 15:16, 23 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

February 2016[edit]

Hello, I'm Yamaguchi先生. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person on Meek Mill, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source, so I removed it. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 00:22, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, had to add a source but forgot to. OGfromtheGut (talk) 23:51, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of YTView for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article YTView is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/YTView until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Antrocent (♫♬) 00:17, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Dejuan Lucian.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Dejuan Lucian.jpg, which you've attributed to Dejuan Lucian. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 15:37, 19 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I have forward the permission of usage to the e-mail (permissions-en). Thanks OGfromtheGut (talk) 16:20, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I have removed the speedy deletion tag and added an {{OTRS pending}} template to the page. It may take a while for the permission email to be matched up with the file, as the OTRS team has a heavy backlog right now. Thanks for taking care of this. — Diannaa (talk) 20:03, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Rapper Banknote Mitch Free Use Photo, Oct 2013.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Rapper Banknote Mitch Free Use Photo, Oct 2013.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Majora (talk) 22:12, 8 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Banknote Mitch.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Banknote Mitch.jpg. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:33, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Banknote Mitch.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Banknote Mitch.jpg, which you've attributed to Mitchell Similton. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 13:30, 1 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion pending for File:Dejuan Lucian.jpg[edit]

Hello, OGfromtheGut. Some time ago, a file you uploaded — File:Dejuan Lucian.jpg — was tagged with {{OTRS pending}}, indicating that you (or perhaps the copyright holder if you did not create this image) submitted a statement of permission to permissions-en@wikimedia.org. Though there is often a backlog processing messages received at this address, we should have received your message by now.

If you have not submitted (or forwarded) a statement of permission, please send it immediately to permissions-en@wikimedia.org and let us know at the OTRS noticeboard that you have done so.

If you have already sent this message, it is possible that there was a problem receiving it. Please re-send it to permissions-en@wikimedia.org and let us know at the OTRS noticeboard that you have done so.

If we don't hear from you within one week, the file will be deleted. If we can help you, please feel free to ask at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 14:44, 7 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Dmitry Fedotov for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dmitry Fedotov is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dmitry Fedotov until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DGG ( talk ) 08:33, 15 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kid Lucky speedy deletion nomination[edit]

Hello this is Jaron. I'm curious as to why you feel that my article for Kid lucky, isn't relivent in the matter, as a beatboxer kid lucky is one of the leading figures in the industry he has pioneerd many techniques and has promoted many of the artists well known in the industry. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jaron Felix Patton (talk • contribs) 11:34, 15 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Jaron, there is almost nothing notable of a beatboxer kid, with bare references. However, if the Speedy Deletion gets declined, I will submit it to AfD to discuss it with the community. OGfromtheGut (talk) 11:37, 15 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Koriefsky[edit]

Hello OGfromtheGut, This is Koriefsky. I have noticed that you have placed my page "Martin Koriefsky" up for speedy deletion. I am not Koriefsky, and the composer died in 1980. I really love his music and contemporary - classical style approach to piano. I was shocked that there was not already a Wikipedia article on him already, so I took the initiative to make one. Kindly remove the nomination for speedy deletion. Best Regards, Koriefsky. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Koreifsky (talk • contribs) 07:38, 16 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Ayaan Chawla (businessman)[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Ayaan Chawla (businessman), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Wgolf (talk) 03:30, 20 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 20[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ayaan Chawla (businessman), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Indian. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:53, 20 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ayaan Chawla[edit]

There has been a long and disruptive history of attempts to push articles about this person. For a summary, see User talk:Vinay089#Ayaan Chawla - the advice I gave another user who wanted to write about him. The title has been "salted" (protected against creation) because of all this trouble, and you cannot get around that by varying the title. Rather than delete your page, I have moved it to Draft:Ayaan Chawla where you can work on it. Do not post it directly, but when it is ready click the "submit" button to send it for review by an uninvolved user.

The references there now are not enough to show notability in Wikipedia's sense. Press releases do not count; interviews do not count for much, because they are the subject talking about himself. Just getting an award is not much. Anyone can set up companies and make himself CEO and set up websites, but what have any of these companies achieved? What is needed is someone independent of Chawla writing about him and his achievemenst in some depth. See WP:Notability (summary). To quote an experienced user in one of the deletion reviews: "Notability has to be for something, and if there are references expressing coverage for nothing much, it doesnt belong in an encyclopedia."

Please note that if you are employed or paid by Chawla, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use ("Paid contributions without disclosure" under section 4) to disclose your interest in any edits where you have a WP:Conflict of interest. JohnCD (talk) 20:47, 21 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppet investigation[edit]

Because we have had so much trouble with sockpuppets pushing Ayaan Chawla, anyone who wants to write about him is now regarded with suspicion. I have listed your name at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Ron Gates with a request for a WP:Checkuser investigation, which will use technical means to determine whether your account is linked to the previous socks. Please make yourself familiar with the notes for the suspect, then, if you wish to do so, respond to the evidence at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Ron Gates.

I am sorry that this is necessary, but this case has caused a great deal of disruption and wasted time, and we need to make clear that people cannot use Wikipedia for publicity purpose by persistently setting up more accounts. If you are not "Ron Gates" the checkuser will make that clear. JohnCD (talk) 20:59, 21 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Bridge of time is a real film[edit]

It was nominated for best short at the 25th Academy Awards also. Ming Hu 232 (talk) 02:39, 22 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This looks like a HOAX. It has no format. OGfromtheGut (talk) 02:40, 22 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry I'm new to wikipedia-i'm not sure how to format it out-I put the imdb link even. also check what links to it. Ming Hu 232 (talk) 02:42, 22 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Dejuan Lucian, Photography.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Dejuan Lucian, Photography.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Whpq (talk) 18:48, 23 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback[edit]

Hello, OGfromtheGut. You have new messages at Whpq's talk page.
Message added 20:48, 23 May 2016 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Whpq (talk) 20:48, 23 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback[edit]

Hello, OGfromtheGut. You have new messages at Whpq's talk page.
Message added 22:20, 23 May 2016 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Whpq (talk) 22:20, 23 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of JaxonFX[edit]

The article JaxonFX has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No indication of notability. The given sources are not reliable and do not serve to verify the article's content.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Huon (talk) 17:33, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

DJ Many[edit]

You asked for DJ Many to be unprotected. I'd advise you to create a draft article in your userspace; when there's a valid article we can go about moving it into articlespace. Please also take a look at the Terms of Use and make sure you comply with the disclosure requirements laid out in the section on "Paid contributions without disclosure". One additional reference you may want to use is this, but extreme care must be taken since the LA Times carefully avoids to endorse any of DJ Many's claims.

On another note, if you want a page to be undeleted, there's WP:DRV; to unprotect it, WP:RPP would be the appropriate venue. Asking random admins, particularly ones not previously involved in the page, is much less likely to succeed. Huon (talk) 17:48, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of PromoBoi[edit]

The article PromoBoi has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No indication of notability, no reliable sources; the best is a group blog. The content largely isn't based on the references anyway. WP:BLP issues.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Huon (talk) 17:59, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Dejuan Lucian[edit]

The article Dejuan Lucian has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No indication of notability, no reliable sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Huon (talk) 18:03, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Delilah Alvares for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Delilah Alvares is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Delilah Alvares until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Velella ^{Velella Talk} 19:22, 27 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Das Dunkle Land (EP) and In My Fragile (album) from Vic Anselmo marked for deletion[edit]

The reason was that there's no reference of the main artist, when in fact the artist is mentioned more than one time, as the standards of many other music's albuns pages. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Menelkir (talk • contribs) 03:45, 29 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I believe also that Vic Anselmo should be marked for deletion. If the album get deleted, I will proceed. User:Menelkir. --OGfromtheGut (talk) 13:23, 29 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Prafful Sarda for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Prafful Sarda is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Prafful Sarda until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DGG ( talk ) 04:42, 30 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: DJ Many (May 30)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Technical close as this is resubmitted for review despite the numerous deletions at DJ Many including a Community Listing which ended as Delete, therefore with this current article giving nothing else different to suggest otherwise, I have to remove this for Review for the time being.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:DJ Many and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SwisterTwister talk 19:42, 30 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

To Everyone[edit]

Hello EVERYONE, I will be creating drafts in the UserSpace I had saved on my notes. This has nothing to do with bulk articles, just some I wrote about because I got interested. Sicerenly, OGfromtheGut (talk) 21:38, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Dejuan Lucian, Photography.jpg[edit]

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Dejuan Lucian, Photography.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:40, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Lucky89 Casino & Resort[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Lucky89 Casino & Resort requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. CNMall41 (talk) 20:21, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 12[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Joshua Ferdinand, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page BA. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:46, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Mark Haapala.png[edit]

A tag has been placed on File:Mark Haapala.png requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an image licensed as "for non-commercial use only," "non-derivative use" or "used with permission," it has not been shown to comply with the limited standards for the use of non-free content. [1], and it was either uploaded on or after 2005-05-19, or is not used in any articles. If you agree with the deletion, there is no need to do anything. If, however, you believe that this image may be retained on Wikipedia under one of the permitted conditions then:

state clearly the source of the image. If it has been copied from elsewhere on the web you should provide links to: the image itself, the page which uses it and the page which contains the license conditions.
add the relevant copyright tag.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 08:37, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I have the signed licence of usage! Where I can send it to. OGfromtheGut (talk) 14:26, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

That license appears to be for "use" on "Wikipedia". It's much too narrow for our purposes; we need it for "commercial use and modification" "everywhere".Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 15:04, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yes! I have a license for all that. Where can I send it to? OGfromtheGut (talk) 15:13, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

WP:OTRS would be the place. Or the photographer could send it in via the procedure described in Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 15:27, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ticket #2016061710013879 OGfromtheGut (talk) 15:51, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Um, was I asked to do something here? I don't have OTRS access. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 15:16, 14 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Ayaan Chawla[edit]

Hello, OGfromtheGut. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Ayaan Chawla".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. 1989 (talk) 04:52, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of BTM Agency[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on BTM Agency requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. bonadea contributions talk 18:06, 12 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of VESSBROZ for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article VESSBROZ is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/VESSBROZ until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Velella ^{Velella Talk} 12:09, 11 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Damir Grubisa[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Damir Grubisa requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. reddogsix (talk) 03:32, 23 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Frank-Michael Preuss for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Frank-Michael Preuss is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Frank-Michael Preuss until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DGG ( talk ) 03:37, 26 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Artz Beatz[edit]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Artz Beatz requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. South Nashua (talk) 16:41, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Formulators Aquaflex[edit]

The article Formulators Aquaflex has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No indication of notability, only sources are press releases.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ... discospinster _talk 13:23, 12 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Formulators Aquaflex for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Formulators Aquaflex is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Formulators Aquaflex until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ... discospinster _talk 18:25, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Justin Wu for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Justin Wu is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Justin Wu until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. FiendYT ★ 19:31, 17 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of International Screenwriter Association[edit]

The article International Screenwriter Association has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NPROD. Article appears strictly promotional in nature. References are either self-generated or provide only passing reference to subject. No reliable sources found in Google search

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Rogermx (talk) 20:05, 28 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Banknote Mitch for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Banknote Mitch is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Banknote Mitch until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

pinktoebeans ^(talk) 11:03, 30 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Hertz Nazaire for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hertz Nazaire is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hertz Nazaire until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

DGG ( talk ) 18:13, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]