User talk:OakRunner

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

OakRunner, you are invited to the Teahouse[edit]

Teahouse logo

Hi OakRunner! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Please join other people who edit Wikipedia at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space on Wikipedia where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. We hope to see you there!

This message was delivered automatically by your friendly neighborhood HostBot (talk) 04:34, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Slightly off-kilter categories[edit]

Thanks I appreciate you diffusing Category:Biology--it needs it--but AD/HD, manic-depression, and OCD are not neurological disorders. If you want to populate Category:Biology of neurological disorders then please do and if you want to create Category:Biology of mental disorders please also do. —Justin (koavf)TCM 20:21, 21 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I was not aware of where these should go and was having a difficult time navigating the differences between neurology, neurobiology, etc. Should the category be named Category:Biology of mental and behavioural disorders since its parent category would likely be Category:Mental and behavioural disorders? Also, once they find better homes do you mind if I remove these different categories from Category:Biology since they are very specific?OakRunner (talk) 20:30, 21 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Not sure Try WT:PSYCH--they should know. Please do remove Category:Biology! It's a good task that you're doing. —Justin (koavf)TCM 20:35, 21 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for the feedback I will ask about this over there.OakRunner (talk) 20:37, 21 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Biological concepts[edit]

Category:Biological concepts, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. fgnievinski (talk) 05:49, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:57, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Scientific laws has been nominated for deletion[edit]

Category:Scientific laws has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Jochen Burghardt (talk) 12:49, 31 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]