User talk:Observer900

Welcome!

Hello, Observer900! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! I dream of horses If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{U|I dream of horses}} to your message. (talk to me) (contributions) @ 08:16, 30 April 2015 (UTC) Getting Started Contributing to Wikipedia The five pillars of Wikipedia • Tutorial • Your first article How to: edit a page • upload an image Getting Help Frequently Asked Questions New contributors' help page Where to: ask questions • make requests Request administrator attention Policies and Guidelines Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Simplified Manual of Style • Three-revert rule Copyrights • Policy for non-free content • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism • Sock puppetry Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability The Community Community Portal • Adopt-a-user program Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • Resolving disputes Build consensus • Village pump IRC channels • Mailing lists Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community (The Signpost) Things to do Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Maintenance • Peer review • Requested articles Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism Miscellaneous Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

Recent edit to Clandon Park

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Clandon Park, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Materialscientist (talk) 08:45, 30 April 2015 (UTC)

March 2016

Please do not add or change content, as you did at New Buckenham, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Charles (talk) 20:30, 9 March 2016 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content, as you did at New Buckenham, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Charles (talk) 22:50, 11 March 2016 (UTC)

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to New Buckenham. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Charles (talk) 10:02, 13 March 2016 (UTC)

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to New Buckenham. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. _Fortuna ^{Imperatrix Mundi} 10:20, 13 March 2016 (UTC)

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Observer900 reported by User:Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi (Result: ). Thank you. _Fortuna ^{Imperatrix Mundi} 10:25, 13 March 2016 (UTC)

Your recent edits

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 12:22, 13 March 2016 (UTC)

March 2016

Please remember to assume good faith when dealing with other editors, which you did not do on User talk:Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi. Thank you. _Fortuna ^{Imperatrix Mundi} 12:22, 13 March 2016 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at New Buckenham shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
Normally you would be blocked from editing at this point, but you did not receive a formal warning about edit warring. This is that warning, so do not violate this hard and fast rule again. Katie^talk 18:45, 13 March 2016 (UTC)

Old- / New- / Buckenham / -Castle

• 8 December 1455: The earl of Salisbury was part of a group complaining that they have been ‘thrust out’ of Buckenham manor, castle, and hundred by the royal escheator ‘which unlawfully remained in the king’s hands,’ as, they say, was proved in court; and so they are claiming to be put in possession again. "Calendar of Close Rolls 1454-61," 91.

• THE PRIORY OF OLD BUCKENHAM, A History of the County of Norfolk: Volume 2 Victoria County History, London, 1906

• Map of Buckenham c. late 188os.- Think this image is probably copyrighted to BHO; you'd probably need your own from the original O/S. Check with some c/r bods on WP though.

• Buckenham Priory and manor, An Essay Towards A Topographical History of the County of Norfolk: Volume 10, London, 1809.

• Buckenham Old + New, A Topographical Dictionary of England, London, 1848.

Talkback

Hello, Observer900. You have new messages at DisillusionedBitterAndKnackered's talk page.
Message added 23:18, 19 March 2016 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Sorry about the very slow reply! DBaK (talk) 23:18, 19 March 2016 (UTC)

March 2016

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. _Fortuna ^{Imperatrix Mundi} 14:24, 22 March 2016 (UTC)

Please assume good faith in your dealings with other editors, which you did not on User talk:NR16NB. Assume that they are here to improve rather than harm Wikipedia. _Fortuna ^{Imperatrix Mundi} 12:24, 23 March 2016 (UTC)

New Buckenham

(In reply to "hello, as a matter of general interest to everybody could you please let us know what are your credentials for knowing anything about New Buckenham, thanks. Observer900 (talk) 08:53, 28 April 2016 (UTC)")

Only secondary sources, so if you're local, please check all statements carefully and thank you in advance. There's not much of about it at the moment: no reference for the "Planned Town" section, nothing on Governance, Landscape, History, Amenities (schools, churches, shopping, transport). Bit of a wreck, really. If you're up for tackling it, you might find it useful to read over pages for a few other places nearby. Woodbridge, Suffolk is a good one, I think. Alburgh I worked on but it was a bit of an uphill struggle. There's been some argument over Southwold (not with me, and mainly about the lighthouse), but the page at the moment reads well and certainly has a lot of information. So has Aldeburgh. Heacham has worked out, I think. Still, those are bigger places. See what you think of Car Colston and Flimby, further afield. Brian Bmcln1 (talk) 09:43, 28 April 2016 (UTC)