User talk:Obsessivelibrarian

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Tammy Bruce[edit]

I have replied on my user talk page. CIreland (talk) 15:44, 29 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. Jimintheatl (talk) 17:24, 29 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Jimintheatl, I'll note here what I posted on your your talk page regarding "Tammy Bruce.". Considering your history of edit warring and being blocked for that, it's amusing you found it important to warn *me* about "edit warring" considering I'm responding to *your* initiation of insertion of malevolent POV in an effort to personally malign the subject as a racist. In fact, you have a history of harassing and maliciously editing the pages of Fox political commentators. As you know, this is an issue now being dealt with by various administrators. But just to return the favor, consider yourself warned as well.Obsessivelibrarian (talk) 05:45, 31 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Prots[edit]

I have rejected your request for semi-protection on Tammy Bruce as inappropriate (per the prot-pol, semi-protection does not prevent autoconfirmed users from editing and is inappropriate for content disputes besides). HOWEVER, I have made a note that the next administrator to review it should see if full-protection is plausible (I'm not acting as the article is politically-related, and I do not wish my political affiliations plastered on Wikipedia). -Jéské Couriano (v^_^v) 06:01, 31 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

October 2008[edit]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Tammy Bruce has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Flewis(talk) 07:34, 31 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Conflict of interest on Tammy Bruce[edit]

If you have a close connection to some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Tammy Bruce, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred from the tone of the edit and the proximity of the editor to the subject, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

  1. editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
  2. participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors;
  3. linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam); and,
  4. avoid breaching relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for businesses. For more details about what, exactly, constitutes a conflict of interest, please see our conflict of interest guidelines.

I strongly suggest you refrain from editing the article directly, instead using the talk page to raise any issues you have with the article's content. As an administrator, I will be watching the article closely. Please note I have no agenda in determining how the article reads, necessarily; rather I want to ensure that the content accurately reflects Wikipedia's policies regarding a neutral point of view and accurate, reliable sourcing. I am happy to listen to any concerns you have, and will help you where I can, as I recognise you are new to Wikipedia and may find much of this bewildering! My talk page is always open. Regards, fish&karate 16:35, 31 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]