User talk:Octopus-Hands

Welcome!

Hello, Octopus-Hands, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 10:27, 26 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sustainable Development Strategy in Canada[edit]

The place you're looking for is Wikipedia:Featured article candidates. The featured article review page is for articles that are already featured. If you want suggestions for how to improve the article before listing it at featured article candidates, I suggest Wikipedia:Peer review. The article you made is a very impressive effort, especially from a newcomer, but I can see some room for improvement. Good luck. Andrew Levine 00:14, 27 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Going Concern[edit]

Hi Octopus-Hands!

Indeed, a going concern is the assumption that a business will continue its present operations into the foreseable future. This is an accounting concept. It is an underlying assumption in accounting as there would be no purpose in providing financial statements if there was no assumption that the entity was to continue it's operations. It can be found in the Statement of accounting policies (at least in elementary level accounting). None the less, it is very related at accountancy.

"going concern" + accounting

^-- Please google that for more information. I will not reverse the change unless you are completely satisfied though :)

Sincerely,

Michael

Yep, that would fit :) GAAP should probably be added to the accountancy section at some stage too though... *notes in mind*.

Cheers :) --Mishkle 06:01, 7 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Mission statement[edit]

I'm a little puzzled as to why you completely reverted the article. I may have been too blunt with the Dilbertian analysis, but there is no way that a mission statement (as that term is used in present practice) would be part of articles of incorporation. Mission statements are not usually created until an organization has been in operation for a while; articles of incorporation are legal documents.--Orange Mike 14:50, 7 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

War of 1812 Aboriginal people[edit]

Since this only has one sentence and no content, my guess is it was supposed to be Category:War of 1812 Aboriginal people --ArmadilloFromHell 15:45, 10 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Exceptional balance[edit]

It would have been nice to know exceptional balance was up for deletion; the convention is to post to the first contributor's talk page with a link to the AFD entry. However, on further investigation I agree that my accounting teacher was wrong about "exceptional balance" being an accepted term. Neon Merlin 04:33, 21 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

1812 problem[edit]

I fear the 1812 people category is buried too deep. (I overlooked it for days). It's simpler to have fewer layers for readers to find things. (We do not have an excessive # categories under 1812). Rjensen 00:21, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Category:American civil war books[edit]

You may have noticed that Category:American civil war books(edit talk links history) has been blanked without a comment. The user who did this may also have severed all links to this category without reconnecting them to the parent categories; at least this happened in the case of one other category. Please check all pages (articles and subcategories) that may have linked to this category for such changes. Thank you! — Sebastian (talk) 01:56, 8 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Never mind! I just noticed that you wrote "delete" yourself, so it's probably not a problem. I assume that you checked the articles that linked to this category, so none is dangling now. — Sebastian (talk) 02:00, 8 December 2006 (UTC) (I stopped watching this page. If you would like to continue the talk, please do so here and ping me.)[reply]

English White Terrier I redirected "Old English Terrier" to what the name of the dog is more commonly called (by Vero Shaw, Rawdon Briggs, Brian Plummer and every other dog writer I am aware of. The original "Old English Terrier" post plagiarised copy from Briggs without attribution, and quoted no source for its incorrect assertions about the history of the breed. I have left in Briggs' breed description, with attribution, and also quoted extensively from Brigg's decription of the breed and its history. Briggs was a top field dog expert and show ring judge during the entire time that the English White Terrier was a breed.

Wikipedia: Verifiable The standard for verifiability is not that the word or fact is mentioned on the internet somewhere, but that it is mentioned by a reputable source. A "spam bot" and a bull dog breeders chatty web cite do not qualify (see wiki link above for the standard). The Britannica citation does not say what is alleged -- it talks about the Enlgish White. And, for the record, is Octopus-Hands the same as "Headphonos"? Sounds and looks like it. -PBurn3711

Fair use rationale for Image:Esprit-cover.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Esprit-cover.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Rettetast (talk) 17:37, 28 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Pre-Homo[edit]

Template:Pre-Homo has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Ucucha 15:22, 15 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:Cover nature.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:Cover nature.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the file description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 17:42, 8 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open![edit]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:19, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:History of music[edit]

Template:History of music has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Zackmann08 (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 18:17, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Blue (Don Cherry's dog) for deletion[edit]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Blue (Don Cherry's dog) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Blue (Don Cherry's dog) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Acous mana 12:25, 21 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Legislation of the War of 1812 has been nominated for renaming[edit]

Category:Legislation of the War of 1812 has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Senator2029 【talk】 07:24, 19 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]