User talk:OfficePuter

An editor has expressed a concern that this account may be a sockpuppet of Pastorwayne (talk · contribs · logs).
Please refer to the sockpuppet investigation of the sockpuppeteer, and editing habits or contributions of the sockpuppet for evidence. This policy subsection may be helpful.

Account information: block log – contribs – logs – abuse log – CentralAuth

Welcome to Wikipedia![edit]

Dear OfficePuter: Welcome to Wikipedia, a free and open-content encyclopedia. I hope you enjoy contributing. To help get you settled in, I thought you might find the following pages useful:

Don't worry too much about being perfect. Very few of us are! Just in case you are not perfect, click here to see how you can avoid making common mistakes.

If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user talk (discussion) page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. A third option is to ask a more experienced user such as an administrator.

One last bit of advice: please sign any discussion comment with four tildes (~~~~). The software will automatically convert this into your signature which can be altered in the "Preferences" tab at the top of the screen. I hope I have not overwhelmed you with information. If you need any help just let me know. Once again welcome to Wikipedia, and don't forget to tell us about yourself and be BOLD! -- SatyrTN (talk | contribs) 15:33, 18 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

CfD nomination of Category:Methodist artists[edit]

I have nominated Category:Methodist artists (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. After Midnight ⁰⁰⁰¹ 00:59, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Latter Day Saint categories[edit]

Hi, I've noticed that you have changed some of the Latter Day Saint categories to move them out of being classified as "Christian". Latter Day Saints self-identify as Christians, and although some Christians do not view them as such, a consensus decision has been made in categorizing Latter Day Saint articles that they will be included as a branch of Christianity. Thanks! Ubi Terrarum 10:24, 5 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

thanks for this info. I will stop making those changes. OfficePuter 11:03, 5 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Recreation of deleted material[edit]

Hi Wayne

Please do not recreate articles or categories which have been deleted after a deletion discussion, such as you did with Category:Catholic primates not in communion with Rome, deleted after this CfD. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 12:46, 5 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

thanks for this pointers. I follow your advise. OfficePuter 12:49, 5 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This blocked user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request.

OfficePuter (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

70.105.86.144 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

Block message:

Abusing multiple accounts: suspected sockpuppet of User:Pastorwayne

Blocking administrator: BrownHairedGirl (talk • blocks)

Decline reason: You have been blocked directly as stated in your block log. Since you have not provided a reason for being unblocked, your request has been declined. You may provide a reason for being unblocked by adding {{unblock | your reason here}} to the bottom of your talk page, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Yamla 19:01, 5 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I not sure I do this right. I think this is right. I not understand "block?" OfficePuter 18:44, 5 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wayne, see WP:BLOCK. --BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 14:51, 6 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

OfficePuter (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

not understanding this. Think perhaps I am confused with someone else. Who is wayne?? Please help to know this better.

Decline reason:

Inadequate reason. See here. — Sandstein 05:19, 7 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

OfficePuter (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I believe I am confused with someone else: wayne? Perhaps he/she is someone on another computer in this facility? I do not believe I do anything wrong. Sockpuppet? I simply did what wikipedia suggests: register. Now I am blocked? I believe this "blocked" is unjustified. Please provide relief. Much appreciation.

Decline reason:

Your editing pattern is remarkably similar to that of blocked user Pastorwayne (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log). Accordingly, the blocking admin's assumption that you are he is reasonable. — Sandstein 12:42, 7 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Help me understand[edit]

What is "editing pattern?" How is "remarkably similar?" Use of words? Common interests? I interest in Christian people. Biography? This other person has similar interest? Please help understanding. Much appreciation.

CfD nomination of Category:U.S. members of the Christian Reformed Church in North America[edit]

Category:U.S. members of the Christian Reformed Church in North America, which you created, has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. – Good Ol’factory ^(talk) 07:52, 14 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Dutch Reformed Christians[edit]

Category:Dutch Reformed Christians, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. JFH (talk) 01:08, 14 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Evangelical and Reformed Americans[edit]

Category:Evangelical and Reformed Americans, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. JFH (talk) 17:08, 6 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]