User talk:Oiyarbepsy/Archive 9

This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Archive 5

←

Archive 7

→

All posts on this page are permanently linked through User talk:Oiyarbepsy/2015G

Nomination of Bellevue, Mississippi for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bellevue, Mississippi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bellevue, Mississippi until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Magnolia677 (talk) 04:49, 17 October 2015 (UTC)

Michael F. McDaniel

Yea, I made it all up. Go ahead and let me be blocked, I suppose. Jporter7789 (talk) 04:10, 22 October 2015 (UTC)

A cup of tea for you!

With this ever dramatic world including WikiDrama, here's a cup of tea to alleviate your day!

This e-tea's remains have been e-composted SwisterTwister talk 03:56, 23 October 2015 (UTC)

User:SwisterTwister, Thanks. It's certainly been drama on New Page Patrol today. Oiyarbepsy (talk) 03:57, 23 October 2015 (UTC)

My first article

I see that you have patrooled my article :Egyptians in the Netherlands. does that mean that it´s gonna be deleted? --Wafaashohdy (talk) 12:25, 23 October 2015 (UTC)

Patrolling simply means that we have an experienced editor take a look at all new articles, or at least as many as we can. I took a look at it, and it looks fine to me. Nobody is getting deleted today. Oiyarbepsy (talk) 14:18, 23 October 2015 (UTC)

Arbitration posts

Vested contributors arbitration case opened

You may opt-out of future notifications related to this case at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Vested contributors/Notification list. You recently offered a statement in a request for arbitration. The Arbitration Committee has accepted that request for arbitration and an arbitration case has been opened at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Vested contributors. Evidence that you wish the arbitrators to consider should be added to the evidence subpage, at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Vested contributors/Evidence. Please add your evidence by November 5, 2015, which is when the evidence phase closes. You can also contribute to the case workshop subpage, Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Vested contributors/Workshop. For a guide to the arbitration process, see Wikipedia:Arbitration/Guide to arbitration. For the Arbitration Committee, L235 (t / c / ping in reply) 01:19, 29 October 2015 (UTC)

Comment at Wikipedia talk:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Vested contributors

Discussion at Wikipedia talk:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Vested contributors is strictly sectioned, per the notice at the top of the page, Sectioned discussion will be strictly enforced on all talk cases in this arbitration case (other than comments by clerks or arbitrators), by direction of a drafter. Please expeditiously move your comment to your own section, or it may be refactored or removed by me or any other clerk or arbitrator. Thanks, L235 (t / c / ping in reply) 04:46, 29 October 2015 (UTC)

Vested contributors retitled Arbitration enforcement 2

You may opt-out of future notifications related to this case at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Arbitration enforcement 2/Notification list. You recently offered a statement in a request for arbitration. The Arbitration Committee has accepted that request for arbitration and an arbitration case has been opened at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Arbitration enforcement 2. Evidence that you wish the arbitrators to consider should be added to the evidence subpage, at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Arbitration enforcement 2/Evidence. Please add your evidence by November 5, 2015, which is when the evidence phase closes. For this case, there will be no Workshop phase. For a guide to the arbitration process, see Wikipedia:Arbitration/Guide to arbitration. For the Arbitration Committee, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 13:45, 29 October 2015 (UTC)

Arbitration enforcement 2 case closed

You are receiving this message because you are a party or offered a preliminary statement and/or evidence in the Arbitration enforcement 2 case. This is a one-time message.

The Arbitration enforcement 2 arbitration case (t) (ev / t) (w / t) (pd / t) has been closed, and the following remedies have been enacted:

1.1) The Arbitration Committee confirms the sanctions imposed on Eric Corbett as a result of the Interactions at GGTF case, but mandates that all enforcement requests relating to them be filed at arbitration enforcement and be kept open for at least 24 hours.

3) For his breaches of the standards of conduct expected of editors and administrators, Black Kite is admonished.

6) The community is reminded that discretionary sanctions have been authorised for any page relating to or any edit about: (i) the Gender Gap Task Force; (ii) the gender disparity among Wikipedians; and (iii) any process or discussion relating to these topics, all broadly construed.

For the Arbitration Committee, Kharkiv07 (T) 02:41, 25 December 2015 (UTC)

Discuss this at: Wikipedia talk:Arbitration Committee/Noticeboard#Arbitration enforcement 2 case closed

Virginia Tech Commonwealth Campus Centers

You had asked about an article I created Virginia Tech Richmond Center. According to the VT Website it's considered at Commonwealth Campus Center.[1] Huskers110110 (talk) 00:54, 2 November 2015 (UTC)

Help

I am being asked a number of pressing questions by User:Widefox and request assistance.Huskers110110 (talk) 10:30, 2 November 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 3

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Plagioselmis, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Saltwater. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:46, 3 November 2015 (UTC)

Talk:Four past Midnight

You can undo the closure and then just vote. Right? I won't compare to discussions revolving like as preposition. --George Ho (talk) 22:43, 3 November 2015 (UTC)

Umm, I don't understand your second sentence. But for a minor capitalization change like this, there is little chance that anyone would object, so just boldly rename it in the future like I did. Oiyarbepsy (talk) 00:29, 4 November 2015 (UTC)

Talk:Five past Midnight in Bhopal and Talk:Years Past Matter would help. Different from Talk:Hurts Like Heaven. --George Ho (talk) 05:10, 4 November 2015 (UTC)

I don't know what you mean when you say those discussions "would help". As far as Hurts Like Heaven, if you had simply moved it, no one probably would have cared. Oiyarbepsy (talk) 05:13, 4 November 2015 (UTC)

I meant they might guide you. "Hurts like Heaven" has never been people's minds; they simply used "Hurts Like Heaven" as if it's not a big deal. Since then, I stayed away from case-by-case "Like"-like discussions. --George Ho (talk) 05:38, 4 November 2015 (UTC)

A short reply to your Welcome Message

Thank you for the Welcome Message but the tag you applied on the article I just wrote (Trichromatic Color Analyser) is not encouraging for continuing my contributions on Wikipedia. I was in the process of collecting references for another article, one about the first flatbed scanner transformed into a densitometer (Chromimage), but I'm going to stop now. If the notability of transforming a scanner into a colorimeter is challanged, then using a scanner as a densitometer (which is far less complicated according to literature) must not be notable at all. So, I'm not going to waste time with Chromimage anymore. If nobody deletes my article in one week, I will delete it myself in case the notability tag is still there. :-) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Colorchaser (talk • contribs) 20:47, 4 November 2015 (UTC)

November 2015

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Bellevue, Mississippi, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 22:53, 5 November 2015 (UTC)

An appropriate source for obtaining geo-coordinates for locations in the United States is GNIS. Magnolia677 (talk) 22:53, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
Sure, template the regular for not using the source that you like and instead using a different source, after you haven't substantially discussed it on the talk page. Oiyarbepsy (talk) 01:58, 6 November 2015 (UTC)

Test page

I removed the red link from the Flow page, and changed the speedy deletion tag to Db-7 (author requests deletion). If G2 is easier, feel free to undo the changge. generic_hipster 03:30, 7 November 2015 (UTC)