User talk:Ojovan

Welcome[edit]

Welcome!

Hello, Ojovan, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially what you did for Configuron. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes ~~~~; this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! --Slashme 16:21, 16 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Your adding of a Viscosity section on amorphous materials[edit]

{{User:Ojovan|Ojovan]], first let me also welcome you to Wikipedia. I thought that the section about amorphous materials which you added to Viscosity was a useful addition. I am the Wikipedian who converted all of your HTML equations into Wikipedia's TeX equations, so as to be consistent with the rest of the article. I see that you added a configurons link today and I assume that means that you probably reviewed my revisions to your original edit. I also assume that you found no mistakes on my part(I hope).

I would strongly suggest that you study Help:Formula to learn how to use TeX because that would serve you well in any future edits you make to Wikipedia articles. It would also be useful for you study Help:Footnotes to learn how to add references in the Wikipedia manner. Best regards, - mbeychok 18:14, 16 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Language[edit]

A tag has been placed on Стеклование, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article is in a foreign language. If you wish for Wikipedia to have this article, please log in or create an account in the Wikipedia of the language it's in.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on Talk:Стеклование. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

You could translate the atricle into English yourself. If you want this article translated by somebody else, please follow the instruction at Wikipedia:Translation. Andreas ^(T) 00:51, 19 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Viscosity B2O3.jpg[edit]

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Viscosity B2O3.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 09:51, 23 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicate images uploaded[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Viscosity B2O3.jpg. A machine-controlled robot account noticed that you also uploaded the same image under the name Image:Viscosity B2O3.JPG. The copy called Image:Viscosity B2O3.JPG has been marked for speedy deletion since it is redundant. If this sounds okay to you, there is no need for you to take any action.

This is an automated message- you have not upset or annoyed anyone, and you do not need to respond. In the future, you may save yourself some confusion if you supply a meaningful file name and refer to 'my contributions' to remind yourself exactly which name you chose (file names are case sensitive, including the extension) so that you won't lose track of your uploads. For tips on good file naming, see Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions about this notice, or feel that the deletion is inappropriate, please contact User:Staecker, who operates the robot account. Staeckerbot 09:59, 23 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicate images uploaded[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Geometry of bonds.jpg. A machine-controlled robot account noticed that you also uploaded the same image under the name Image:Density on Temperature G.JPG. The copy called Image:Density on Temperature G.JPG has been marked for speedy deletion since it is redundant. If this sounds okay to you, there is no need for you to take any action.

This is an automated message- you have not upset or annoyed anyone, and you do not need to respond. In the future, you may save yourself some confusion if you supply a meaningful file name and refer to 'my contributions' to remind yourself exactly which name you chose (file names are case sensitive, including the extension) so that you won't lose track of your uploads. For tips on good file naming, see Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions about this notice, or feel that the deletion is inappropriate, please contact User:Staecker, who operates the robot account. Staeckerbot 12:59, 23 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Image:Density vs T.jpg[edit]

A tag has been placed on Image:Density vs T.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on [[ Talk:Image:Density vs T.jpg|the talk page]] explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Mifter (talk) 00:24, 11 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Rydberg matter[edit]

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Rydberg matter. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rydberg matter. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:11, 16 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No self-advertising, please[edit]

Dear Dr. Ojovan, it's nice to see an established scientist like you contribute in his domain of expertise. Just make sure you are not focussing too closely on summarizing your own research. As of today, four of eight references in melting go to papers you co-authored. This looks to me like inappropriate self-advertising. Fragility has been discussed in hundreds of scientific papers; there are tens of "theories" and "explanations". As of today, the articles fragility and viscous liquid are advertising your view in a way that is not compatible with Wikipedia's policy "neutral point of view" and "no original research". To avoid conflict, it would be best you clean up said articles by your own, reducing the number of self-references, summarizing your views as shortly as possible, and making clear that they represent one theoretical among others. Thank you in advance, -- Marie Poise (talk) 21:07, 23 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Density vs Temperature.jpg listed for deletion[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Density vs Temperature.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Sven Manguard Wha? 14:16, 9 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Density vs Temperature.JPG listed for deletion[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Density vs Temperature.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Sven Manguard Wha? 14:17, 9 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Geometry of bonds.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Geometry of bonds.jpg, which you've sourced to Journal Exp. Theor. Phys. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-enwikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-enwikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 05:37, 22 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]