User talk:OliverC200

December 2018[edit]

Hello, I'm Longhair. I noticed that you recently removed content from Brian Frosh without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Longhair\^talk 21:44, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Brian Frosh. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continual disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. LynxTufts (talk) 21:53, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Brian Frosh, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. Everedux (talk) 22:00, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at Brian Frosh. Everedux (talk) 22:09, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Longhair\^talk 22:23, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Unblocked[edit]

As discussed by email, I am unblocking this account following a successful appeal, on the condition that you follow community guidelines on conflicts of interest. Specifically, it is necessary to fully disclose conflicts of interest, including a personal or professional relationship with the subjects of articles you wish to edit, and to refrain from directly editing any article with which you have such a COI. Instead, to propose substantive edits, you should use edit requests posted on the talk page of the article, and wait for volunteer editors to review the request. You can reply to this post with your disclosure; it would also be a good idea to place the information on your user page (User:OliverC200) and mention your COI in any edit requests you make. Before proposing edits, please be familiar with relevant content policies, such as the neutral point of view and verifiability policies.

We have particularly strict expectations for the content of articles that are biographies of living persons. If you believe a biography article has problematic or inaccurate content, you can also request broader community review at the biographies of living persons noticeboard.

Thank you. Opabinia regalis (talk) 07:39, 6 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion[edit]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident with which you may be involved. Thank you. Adoring nanny (talk) 11:39, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]