Jump to content

User talk:Oliverabc

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

February 2013[edit]

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion[edit]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. ProtossPylon 21:49, 1 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Peter Wray[edit]

So you genuinely believe this article was written from a neutral point of view? Oh wait, you are a brand new account created today for the purpose of keeping wray's hilariously non-neutral article intact.Hexrei2 (talk) 21:24, 1 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I am not a brand new account, my account was not "created today" and your unusual bias is clearly evident, as you seem to have become an instant expert on everything. I don't know what your odd agenda is but I see you were warned about vandalizing and imposing your obnoxious views on other pages as well. Oliverabc (talk) 15:24, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I moved this conversation from Oliverabc's user page; it doesn't belong there. Hexrei, you should be more civil in your comments. Oliverabc, you may have created this account last November, but you didn't use it to edit it until now, and your edits were hardly constructive.--Bbb23 (talk) 15:40, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Bbb23 thank you for your message, please note that I only reverted the constant modifications of Hexrei2 back to the original version that has been the ongoing work of several contributors over many years. I did not make any edits at all, just reverted the article. Thanks. Oliverabc (talk) 15:44, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, Oliverabc, you are correct, my apologies. That said, the article has been a mess since 2007, as the admin who closed the AfD noted. Restoring the deletions made by Hexrei isn't going to improve the article. Rewriting it in an encyclopedic manner with sources would be the best approach.--Bbb23 (talk) 15:58, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Bbb23. I don't disagree with your point at all about the article, my only concern was the evident bias and behavior of HexRei2. Thank you.Oliverabc (talk) 16:09, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Well, frankly, I don't know who is biased, if anyone. My two concerns are (1) preventing disruption (e.g., edit-warring) and (2) quality article content.--Bbb23 (talk) 16:12, 2 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]