User talk:One-point-twenty-one-jigawatts

July 2020[edit]

Hello, I'm Nkon21. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Non-primary sources are needed in order to justify a big claim such as the one you added. Also, do not add wikilinks to pages still in draftspace. ɴᴋᴏɴ21 ❯❯❯ talk 22:36, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome![edit]

Hello, One-point-twenty-one-jigawatts, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Nathan2055^{talk - contribs} 22:40, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Graham Ivan Clark[edit]

A tag has been placed on Draft:Graham Ivan Clark requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Per WP:BLPCRIME and WP:PERPETRATOR, an article should not be created until the accused is actually convicted

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, pages that meet certain criteria may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Nathan2055^{talk - contribs} 22:43, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

MfD nomination of Draft:Graham Ivan Clark[edit]

Draft:Graham Ivan Clark, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Graham Ivan Clark and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Draft:Graham Ivan Clark during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Nathan2055^{talk - contribs} 22:52, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Nathan2055: Thank you for your comments. I have provided a justification for why this page should not be deleted here. Thank you. One-point-twenty-one-jigawatts (talk) 23:59, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Premature mention of suspect's identity on 2020 Twitter bitcoin scam[edit]

Please stop adding unreferenced or poorly referenced biographical content, especially if controversial, to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at 2020 Twitter bitcoin scam. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Deryck C. 22:59, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Consensus at Talk:2020 Twitter bitcoin scam#Premptive caution right now is to NOT name the accused in the article per the established policy on non-notable and non-convicted accused at WP:BLPCRIME and WP:PERPETRATOR. You are welcome to discuss this on the talk page, but please stop edit warring against the established consensus or you may end up being blocked. Nathan2055^{talk - contribs} 23:37, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I did not intend to edit war. I believe I cited appropriate sources with a factual statement about the state of affairs regarding the event. I understand there is a distinct and separate discussion about the name of the accused (and now charged) minor. My understanding of wikipedia is that contributions may be added directly to the article rather than discussed ahead of time if they are factual, abide by the wikipedia policies, and are appropriately sourced. My intention was not to cause conflict but to provide meaningful and accurate content to the article. My sincere apologies if I have unknowingly violated written policies or established social norms among editors. Thank you. One-point-twenty-one-jigawatts (talk) 23:55, 31 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Deryck Chan: I have reviewed your claim and I believe it is not accurate. The content I contributed is sourced with multiple sources and it appears that the page editors have retained the contribution at 2020 Twitter bitcoin scam. If you agree, I would sincerely appreciate your removing the claim against me above. If you do not agree, I would sincerely appreciate a precise account of exactly why the content and sources violate wikipedia policy (which I believe they do not). Thank you. One-point-twenty-one-jigawatts (talk) 00:07, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I get your point and have retitled this section and struck out the warning I gave. Please follow the discussion at Talk:2020 Twitter bitcoin scam#Premptive caution; I don't have anything else to add that what other editors have already said. Deryck C. 00:20, 1 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Graham Ivan Clark[edit]

Hello, One-point-twenty-one-jigawatts. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Graham Ivan Clark".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Celestina007 (talk) 22:01, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]