User talk:Onel5969/Archive 70

Archive 65

←

Archive 68

Archive 69

Archive 70

Archive 71

Archive 72

→

Archive 75

Archive 58: September 2019

Jalor City F.C. and Wat Bot City F.C. playing in Thai League 4 not Thailand Amateur League

Jalor City F.C. is competing in Thai League 4 Southern region. Wat Bot City F.C. is competing in Thai League 4 Northern region. You can find additional data from Thai League's official website [1]. Now they are not amateur teams. Thai League 4 is a professional league system. 2019 season featured since 9 February to 1 September, 27 matches for Northern region and 24 matches for Southern region. So that, these teams must not redirect to Thailand Amateur League. Gunkiet (talk) 03:41, 2 September 2019 (UTC)

Igor Krivokapic

You nominated my creation of the article about "Igor Krivokapic" for deletion and already deleted it. You saythe text is copied, and user Jimfbleak points to my personal website. Actually I am really pissed off because I first created the text on Wikipedia and THEN LATER copied the text to my website. I did this order because I already did it vice versa and some other wonderful admins here then deleted my articles because it was first on my website and 10 minutes later on Wikipedia. I thought I got the point and so made it correctly. So the Wiki text was first and I copied the text for my website LATER IN TIME. So you please restore my article immediately. Thanks. Tobias Broeker — Preceding unsigned comment added by 20th c violin concerto (talk • contribs) 12:46, 2 September 2019 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	For cleanup of new articles ~Kvng (talk) 17:22, 2 September 2019 (UTC)

Thanks Kvng - Keep up your good work over at AfC.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 10:10, 3 September 2019 (UTC)

mensura jahic english version

Hello, you wrote that my article will be removed because it seems it is copied from another article, it is an english version of Mensura Jahic article on wikipedia on srpsko/hrvatski language. Please, I kindly ask you to help me pair it with original version on srpsko/hrvatski language as an translation, that was my intention but I obviously didn't do it right. thank you in advance for your help. — Preceding unsigned comment added by AmraAB (talk • contribs) 20:08, 2 September 2019 (UTC)

Jalor City F.C. and Wat Bot City F.C. playing in Thai League 4 not Thailand Amateur League

Jalor City F.C. is competing in Thai League 4 Southern region. Wat Bot City F.C. is competing in Thai League 4 Northern region. You can find additional data from Thai League's official website [2]. Now they are not amateur teams. Thai League 4 is a professional league system. 2019 season featured since 9 February to 1 September, 27 matches for Northern region and 24 matches for Southern region. So that, these teams must not redirect to Thailand Amateur League. Gunkiet (talk) 15:03, 3 September 2019 (UTC)

Can I get Mark Rosen Reviewed

I would like to have the page Mark Rosen reviewed. I created this page a while back, over a year ago and it was never reviewed. Thanks! Eibln (talk) 14:36, 4 September 2019 (UTC)

Thank you! Eibln (talk) 15:05, 4 September 2019 (UTC)

Births of U.S. states and territories by race/ethnicity

It seems to me that it is not necessary to place another source that simply copy this source that I place, since this source is primary. Other sources would be just copies based on this. it seems to me that this source is already enough, because it's a list, it's data created by them, and they are the indicated ones to provide this information. See the wikipedia article of the Kaiser Family Foundation.--BrugesFR (talk) 23:36, 5 September 2019 (UTC)

Check for Copyright Violations

Hello, hope you're doing good.

I created 3 fresh pages today which are Amar Dedić, Emmanuel Michael and Bryan Okoh.

I'll like you to review and check them, to make sure I'm no more violating copyrights again.

Thanks. Nnadigoodluck (talk) 12:51, 6 September 2019 (UTC)

Jessore

Thanks for cleaning it up - figured a histmerge and then moving it back to Jessore (town) would be the correct move. SportingFlyer T·C 03:19, 11 September 2019 (UTC)

No worries, SportingFlyer - wasn't a bad choice, just felt it was better if all the redirect/revert redirect crap was better if it simply wasn't there. I've actually never gone the histmerge route, having always gone the del and then move route. But I can see places where that's a completely valid method, for example if there was simply a redirect with zero history. Regardless, keep up the good work. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 03:41, 11 September 2019 (UTC)

Draft:Temple Neuf, Metz

If you would like to review Draft:Temple Neuf, Metz, I've added references and material to it! Paris91 (talk) 05:59, 11 September 2019 (UTC)

Nice job Paris91 - moved it back to mainspace. keep up the good work.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 10:27, 11 September 2019 (UTC)

Re:RBU-1200 moved to draftspace

Dear Onel5969, The article was a translation of the original article[[3]] (German),which lacked enough sources and citations. I just translated the article. Now, I improved the article b a bit and resubmit it for review.You can review Draft:RBU-1200 ,and tell me if anything else is needed.Thank you.-AzfarShams (talk) 06:47, 11 September 2019 (UTC)

Hi AzfarShams - That happens a lot when pages are translated from other Wiki's, most of which don't have the same standards as English WP. I've moved it back to mainspace. If you can find more sources for it, that would be a good thing. Thanks for your contributions.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 10:35, 11 September 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: United Cube Concert – One

Hello Onel5969. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of United Cube Concert – One, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: notable performers and notable organisator both indicate significance. Thank you. SoWhy 13:01, 12 September 2019 (UTC)

I have unreviewed a page you curated

Hi, I'm Arthistorian1977. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Uthman ibn Abi'l-Ula, and have marked it as unpatrolled. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you.

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Arthistorian1977 (talk) 17:31, 12 September 2019 (UTC)

Hey there, Arthistorian1977 - any particular reason? Seems like a valid redirect to me. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 17:33, 12 September 2019 (UTC)

Not this again :(. Looks like when I press review seconds after you do it, the tool does an opposite action. My apologies. Arthistorian1977 (talk) 17:35, 12 September 2019 (UTC)

No worries, Arthistorian1977 - I've done that too. Thought that might be the case, but I always like to check in case there's something I missed. Keep up the good work. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 17:40, 12 September 2019 (UTC)

Deletion of my page

Hello, I had created a page for Italian Entrepreneur Maria Sole Agnelli. I had multiple sources and people that agreed with me. Furthermore,there is already an italian page for her and there are english pages for her nephews that have done much less with much less sources (Most of the Brandolini D'Adda cousins on the wiki) I wanted to restore the page to my version but I of course wanted to communicate with you before doing anything Thanks in Advance Kind Regard Ranieri001 (talk) 22:10, 13 September 2019 (UTC)

Hi Ranieri001 - First, the fact that an article exists on another wiki is irrelevant. Most other wikis have much less stringent notability criteria than English WP. Second, while her nephews may have pages, that is also irrelevant. It's called an WP:OSE argument. Just because an article exists on Wikipedia does not mean it is necessarily a good model to base a new article on. Wikipedia is monitored by volunteers, so it's not unusual for an inappropriate article to slip through the cracks. That's why every month 100s of articles go through the AfD process and get deleted. Third, it appears you translated the page from the Italian wiki. Thank you for that, since we need folks to translate articles. But when you do, please provide the proper attribution, which in this case would read something like "translated from Italian Wikipedia article". Fourth, biographies of living people (see BLP), require that virtually every assertion have a reliable source. So the information about her horse, as well as the opening statement need references. Now, because I restored the redirect does not mean that this woman is not notable, it simply means that in its current state the article isn't sourced well enough to show her notability. Currently, there are two sources. The first is a simple listing, while the second is to a work of fiction, which while it is based on historical events, makes it an invalid source. On English WP, to show notability you need at least 2-3 in-depth references from independent, reliable sources to show notability. Take a look at WP:GNG for general notability guidelines, and WP:RS for what constitutes a reliable source. If you wish to work on the article, I can move it into draft space for you, and you can work on it there until you feel it's sourced well enough for mainspace. Hope this helps. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:40, 14 September 2019 (UTC)

Hello. I guess your propose for Ekaterina Katashinskaia for non notability, she also quailfy the terms of “Won a Junior Grand Prix event or qualified to the Junior Grand Prix Final.” She won her JGP event twice. Yoniiieei (talk) 22:34, 21 September 2019 (UTC)

Rudolf Bayr final

Hey man, im back, and as promised I have found 3 or 4 more sources directly from this guy's books to add to the Rudolf Bayr article, as versions might vary i also added the pages but if you go and look at them personally the pages might vary. anyways as always thanks for ur time and friendship my man. have a good one (if you have time i also made my first article on a living person, its called Fred De Palma because i saw that it had a bit of visits on the italian Wiki so i thought it would be a good idea). — Preceding unsigned comment added by Spaicol (talk • contribs) 07:02, 14 September 2019 (UTC)

Hi Spaicol and welcome back. First, please take a look at WP:CIT on how to properly format citations. Looking at those will also give you an understanding of what information needs to be included in the citations. While page numbers are a definite need, there are other items needed to properly identify a source. Until that happens, I can't truly evaluate whether Bayr meets WP:GNG. I think he does, but I'm not sure. Regarding blp's, as I told the editor just above, make sure that every assertion has a reliable source to back it up. The only issue I see in your article is the final several sentences, which appear to be unreferenced, which I've tagged. Once you reference them, simply remove that tag. Also, thank you for translating articles, we need that on English WP, but remember when you do to give proper attribution. I made a small edit, and left the attribution, which you can see on the article's history page. Hope this helps.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:58, 14 September 2019 (UTC)

Hey man, thanks for linking me the stuffs, ill get on it as soon as possible, good to see u again too, much love Spaicol (talk) 21:01, 14 September 2019 (UTC)

wow

you are organised! thanks for your response to the NSW bizarro stuff - much appreciate your effort! JarrahTree 11:46, 15 September 2019 (UTC)

Thanks JarrahTree - block evasions really piss me off. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 11:48, 15 September 2019 (UTC)

some of the subs created by both user names were legit enough - which would confuse anyone reviewing what the frank zappa was going on... JarrahTree 11:51, 15 September 2019 (UTC)

Absolutely. But I'm of the opinion, that even if an article is a valid subject, if it was created by a blocked user it should be summarily deleted. Else, it's simply an encouragement to block evaders to continue to attempt to evade blocks. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 11:54, 15 September 2019 (UTC)

indeed, you have the energy and enthusiasm - just a small fyi

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Australian_Wikipedians%27_notice_board/Archive_51#Revisiting_cadastral_divisions from the depths of the oz archives regarding an aspect of the particular editors enthusiasms JarrahTree 11:58, 15 September 2019 (UTC)

but I have a problem where there is a genuine attempt by other eds to improve or add to like https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hundred_of_Perlubie

the New South Wales items I understand your concern, but wherein the contents of such items at South Australia, well I have a problem with full edit removal (ie the earlier user name the legit items I believe have a case for existence, creations by the second name I understand) - a moral dilemma me thinks... JarrahTree 12:20, 15 September 2019 (UTC)

I understand the dilemma when other editors have made contributions to the article. In my mind I weigh those contributions versus the incentive to block evaders. I think if there has been significant improvement, I have no issue with keeping the article. But barring that, I think we should delete the article. Regardless, thanks for all you do on WP.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 22:42, 15 September 2019 (UTC)

edit war

there is a war of editions in the article of Mexico City between me and the User:Generic515, please I need you to act in mediation, it is about the color of a group of images that he wants to gray the box and I think it distorts the article besides that it does not match the rest of images. thank you very much.--BrugesFR (talk) 05:45, 16 September 2019 (UTC)

Well, first, don't edit war. Start a discussion on the talk page. Second, I see culpability on both sides, since this is a style issue for the most part. However, there was definitely some communication issues. Bottom line is, the other editor is correct that in English WP it is perfectly acceptable to use the conversion template from meters to feet, since both are used in the English speaking world. I would change the label at the top of the box from masl to simply say "elevation". That would alleviate the duplication issue. And FWIW, I agree that the table looks better without the foot conversion, but the other editor is perfectly within their rights to add it.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 10:38, 16 September 2019 (UTC)

Ynés Mexia

I noticed you undid my edit, as I used the copy-and-paste method to superficially move Ynés Mexia. Please see Talk:Ynés Mexia#Requested move 16 September 2019. WikiWinters (talk) 13:41, 16 September 2019 (UTC)

Thanks for the ping WikiWinters - commented at the move request. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:53, 16 September 2019 (UTC)

Vish redirect

Hi Onel5969, you recently turned Vish (TV series) into a redirect to Viacom 18. There's no mention of the show at the target, and the last revision with content doesn't mention Viacom 18. Could you explain why you chose the target that you did so that I know how to categorize it correctly? Wug·a·po·des​ 18:05, 18 September 2019 (UTC)

Hi Wugapodes - Sorry, I've been neglecting my talk page. I redirected it to Viacom 18 because the article says it was aired on Colors TV, which redirects there.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 23:04, 21 September 2019 (UTC)

Kasumi Suzuki

Hey, I noticed you reverted my edits on Kasumi Suzuki and I was wondering if there was a way I could contest the redirect since she's notable with some lead roles? lullabying (talk) 18:41, 18 September 2019 (UTC)

Sorry, only one signficant role, which is where the redirect points to.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 22:47, 21 September 2019 (UTC)

This edit shows she was also in plenty of other lead roles, such as Karas and a couple of dramas. It just seems weird to have the redirect point to that page when she's more well-known in other roles. lullabying (talk) 17:09, 26 September 2019 (UTC)

Hey, sorry to bother you again, but I didn't get a response on this. I know there was an AfD to delete her article (resulting in redirect) but I have found plenty of sources since then where she was cast in lead roles for several projects. I would like to restore this article if necessary. lullabying (talk) 16:46, 4 November 2019 (UTC)

Sorry, she's had no significant roles since the AfD in 2016. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 23:24, 4 November 2019 (UTC)

I agree she has had no significant roles since the AfD, but she has had significant roles in the past. Most of the people who nominated for the article to be deleted don't speak Japanese, where there are more sources available. I tried to find as many existing articles that discussed her in lead roles. lullabying (talk) 18:51, 7 November 2019 (UTC)

Rogers All Stars

Hi Onel5969, I saw that you added some maintenance tags to an article I recently moved to main, Rogers All Stars. I appreciate the feedback but I am a little unclear on where additional inline citations are needed. I have cited everything in the prose of the article inline, although sometimes if all the info in one paragraph comes from one source I prefer to just put one citation at the end of the paragraph rather than after each sentence. Thanks for your help. Boomur [☎] 01:56, 21 September 2019 (UTC)

Hi Boomur - I should have only tagged it with a single tag, needing more references, and only really one, for the Artists section, which is wholly unreferenced. Keep up the good work. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 22:50, 21 September 2019 (UTC)

Thank you for clarifying! I have moved the refimprove tag to the Artists section and cited a couple of the entries. Cheers. Boomur [☎] 00:54, 24 September 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion declined: Nikolas Tesla

Hello Onel5969. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Nikolas Tesla, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: G5: The user was neither blocked nor banned at the time of page creation. Thank you. –Darkwind (talk) 06:34, 21 September 2019 (UTC)

Err, I realized the automated message above isn't very clear. G5 only applies to pages created by a blocked or banned user who violated their block/ban to create the page. It does not retroactively apply to pages created by a now-blocked user before they were blocked. –Darkwind (talk) 06:35, 21 September 2019 (UTC)

No worries, Darkwind - I was hesitant to do it regardless, since although the user is blocked, it's not a bad redirect. I tend to lean towards delete when dealing with blocked users, so as not to encourage them to sock. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 22:43, 21 September 2019 (UTC)

Figure skating notability

Hello. you’ve marked on my creation “Devid Naryzhnyy” for non notability and I’ve looked over the detailed terms. And Devid Naryzhnyy has notability for qualifing Junior grandprix Finals, https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Figure_Skating/Notability go check number 7 : Won a Junior Grand Prix event or qualified to the Junior Grand Prix Final. Yoniiieei (talk) 22:31, 21 September 2019 (UTC)

Hi Yoniiieei - That's an inactive, historical page. The current guideline is WP:NSKATE, which I named in my prod. You'll see that the simply qualifying is no longer applicable. Sorry. But don't let this discourage you. It's a well-crafted page, simply doesn't meet notability guidelines.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 22:36, 21 September 2019 (UTC)

Hi, But as here says ....it meets the “general” notability guidelines. “Q3: If a sports figure does not meet the criteria specified in a sports-specific notability guideline, does this mean he/she does not meet Wikipedia's notability standards? A3: No, it does not mean this—if the subject meets the general notability guideline, then he/she meets Wikipedia's standards for having an article in Wikipedia, even if he/she does not meet the criteria for the appropriate sports-specific notability guideline. The sports-specific notability guidelines are not intended to set a higher bar for inclusion in Wikipedia: they are meant to provide some buffer time to locate appropriate reliable sources when, based on rules of thumb, it is highly likely that these sources exist. Q4: What is considered a "reasonable amount of time" to uncover appropriate sources? A4: There is no fixed rule, as it may differ in each specific case. Generally, though, since there is no fixed schedule to complete Wikipedia articles, given a reasonable expectation that sources can be found, Wikipedia editors have been very liberal in allowing for adequate time, particularly for cases where English language sources are difficult to find. For a contemporary sports figure in a sport that is regularly covered by national media in English, less leeway may be given.”. I don’t know how much you know about figure skating, Junior Grandprix final is the biggest event of Figure Skating. And they qualified for this. Yoniiieei (talk) 22:52, 21 September 2019 (UTC)

Can you stop with the blanking spree?

Not 20 Anymore has quite a few news articles on the article. Lalalay reached the top 5 in Korea. Y2K (record producer) has charted in a bunch of countries. None of these fail notability criteria. The Saint Asonia article has three news articles listed on it. I think your take on WP:NSONGS and WP:NALBUMS is out of step with everybody else's, and I think you just like redirecting articles. Please stop with the blanking sprees, they're not helpful and very contentious. The next step is AFD. Feel free to nominate them. Ss112 04:17, 22 September 2019 (UTC)

Also, you are problematically blanking articles like Shaped by Fire when there are a dozen news sources present, and Korean topics that there is plenty of coverage on—Dear My Dear and Closer to You (Exo-SC song) being two—this reads like bias against Korean topics just because you don't understand them. Songs and albums do not require English-language sources and can still be notable without them, and those two definitely are. Ss112 04:23, 22 September 2019 (UTC)

Hi Onel5969. I am assuming good faith here, but these page blankings don't appear to be supported by our guidelines. Blanking pages, while not prohibited in all cases, is a pretty extreme step and you need to be sure you are on solid ground. The fact that there appear to be multiple cases of inappropriate such actions suggests at the very least, an unfortunate lapse in judgement. We all have bad days, but please be more careful. As Ss112 noted, if you think any of these pages don't meet our guidelines... WP:AfD <<<< is that way. Thanks for your long record of work on the project. -Ad Orientem (talk) 04:55, 22 September 2019 (UTC)

Greetings Ad Orientem and Ss112. I agree Not 20 Anymore and Lalalay were errors. My apologies for those. I did redirect Y2K (record producer), since there is only a single in-depth article about the producer. The rest are about the song, or are primary sources. As for Shaped by Fire, the "dozen" news sources barely talk about the album. They are more about the notoriety of the lead singer. In fact, several do not mention the album at all (Blabbermouth, Loudwire 2/9/2017, PRP, Loudwire 12/18/17, Loudwire 4/12/19, Loudwire 9/13/19), while others (YouTube and Facebook) are not reliable sources, while others give a brief mention of the album (metalnexus (which I also question the RS of - appears to be a blog)), others (Blabbermouth, ultimate guitar) are simply promo announcements or blogs. In that morass of poor citations, I did redirect that as well. Regarding Closer to You (Exo-SC song) and other Korean songs, there's no bias regarding foreign language sources, not with translator programs. The first two sources don't mention the song, YouTube sources are not RS as to notability, Twitter is not a reliable source, and the final two news sources don't mention the the song at all. In fact, they seem to contradict what is in the article, as they say the three title tracks are: "Wat a Life", "Slightly Faint", and "You Can Sing". And the EP charted, not the song, so yes, WP:NSONG would apply. Others, such as The Practice of Love (album) were wholly uncited. While others, like Pose To Do, with only a single in-depth source, were so poorly sourced that I did follow WP:NSONG and redirect. Then there were articles like Flawed Design (album), which only had 3 primary sources (since interviews are primary). Both NSONG and NALBUM state that sourcing must be independent, and WP:NALBUM clearly states that "other publications where the musician or ensemble talks about the recording" do not count towards notability. Others, like You Can't Stop the Girl, are poorly sourced (in terms of notability). Only the Variety piece goes to notability (the other 4 sources being two listings and two tweets), and it doesn't really go into depth about the song. The rest of the redirects used similar methodology. I've reviewed literally hundreds of articles which have been created out of Ss112's stubs, and probably 95% of them pass review. In fact, yesterday I think I reviewed about 50, and redirected about a dozen. And other than the two I admit should have simply been marked "reviewed", the others as per WP:SONG and WP:NALBUM should have been redirected. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:30, 22 September 2019 (UTC)

I'm not saying much beyond that I am not getting into deconstructing all the sources present on each of the articles, and even if we did at AfD or the like, whether the sources currently present prove notability or not, it is my belief the articles I restored are all notable topics and there are sources that exist on them that prove their notability, and said nominations would fail. I did not revert every article you redirected—you might notice I left Pose to Do alone, and I did not restore The Practice of Love (album)—that was another editor. Also, K-pop tracks frequently have an English and a Korean title. The source you pointed out does not contradict what the article states. That Exo-SC song's Korean title translates to Faintly while its English title is "Just Us 2". Ss112 12:50, 22 September 2019 (UTC)

Boubon

Hi Onel5969, I see you commented on my new Boubon article. Your complaint that this article is an orphan seems an unfair criticism, as it is quite logic that no (or few) articles refer to an article that did not previously exist! If you go to other wiki-articles on "Populated places in Niger" you will see that most of them are orphans but you did not add an orphan-tag there. Why didn't you? In fact, it is quite hard for articles on small villages in Africa NOT to be orphans, as -generally speaking- very few Wiki-worthy things happen in such villages. Anyway, to quench your thirst I added references to Boubon in 5 other wiki-articles. You also say there are not enough citations. This I do not understand either: the climate data are clearly referenced. The detailed story about French colonial rule is clearly referenced, from a book by André Salifou. I have that book at home and even went so far as to see if it was available on the web (it was). Even the former existence of a hotel is clearly referenced and demonstrated with a photo. Still, I added an extra reference for your convenience. Best regards, NigerTZai (talk) 12:45, 23 September 2019 (UTC)

Hi NigerTZai - First, you mistake observation with criticism. If an article is an orphan, than it's an orphan. That's not a criticism, but simply a tag placed on the page so that other editors know to look for ways to de-orphan it. There are some editors who specialize in doing just that. Second, terms like "quench your thirst" are pretty much uncivil, if you have that attitude, please do not post on my page again. Third, while you've added a reference, there are still items in your article which are unsourced (your footnote #2 is not a valid footnote).Onel5969 ^{TT me} 10:39, 25 September 2019 (UTC)

I have unreviewed a page you curated

Hi, I'm QuiteUnusual. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Joseph N. Chambers, and have marked it as unpatrolled. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you. The page needs a little work for style and format, so I've unmarked it so that the NPP will pick it up.

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

QuiteUnusual (talk) 15:26, 23 September 2019 (UTC)

For all your reviews and cleanup

		The Reviewer Barnstar
		Thanks for all the reviews of articles I've recently created and the general cleanup of them. I appreciate all your diligent work. The Mirror Cracked (talk) 18:23, 23 September 2019 (UTC)

Thanks The Mirror Cracked, keep up the good work. My grandparents hail from Abertillery, got married across the mountain in the church in Six Bells, so I love stuff about Wales. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 10:47, 25 September 2019 (UTC)

nomination of deletion

hi. I know you contribute so much on wikipedia’s deletion I suggest you to put flag also [Kamila Valieva], Lee Hae-in(figure skater), Andrei Mozalev I guess your contributio. may contribute to suggest a revise on standard on figureskaters. Thxx Yoniiieei (talk) 03:28, 24 September 2019 (UTC)

Hi. I don't go looking for articles to delete. But when I come across an article during NPP that doesn't meet notability standards, I do nominate it. I have no interest in figure skating, and so would not participate in any discussion regarding the WP:SKATE SNG.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 10:50, 25 September 2019 (UTC)

Delete my Wikipedia page

Hello Onel5969, My Wikipedia page was delete 26th August, 2019. I was create my profile this year June, after 2 months my profile was delete by reason of same content, refers http://atanuraychaudhuri.com/bio/. Atanu Ray Chaudhuri is a very respectable person in India, and he is professionally a advocate & well known film producer in Bengali film industry.

So, I would like to inform you that, I want to start this page with different content, which will be not used in any other places, and it will be not any copy paste content. So Can i do that? Please inform me, it's urgent. Roy Chaudhuri Atanu (talk) 08:22, 25 September 2019 (UTC)

(talk page watcher) You seem to have a conflict of interest. Tamravidhir (talk) 08:25, 25 September 2019 (UTC)

Hi Roy Chaudhuri Atanu, as Tamravidhir - It appears you do have a COI issue, are you related to this individual in any way? If so, you should not work on their page. You could make a request at Wikipedia:Requested articles, providing valid sources showing this person's notability (hint, the link you provided above doesn't). And creating a page is never "urgent". Making that statement might mean that you wish to create a page for advertising purposes, which is not what Wikipedia is for. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 10:59, 25 September 2019 (UTC)

I’m very sorry to disturb you boss

I apologize for disturbing you. I’m doing so because I need your help in reviewing the page I created Chris Okagbue. I come to you because You are the person who reviewed the last 3 or 4 pages I created after other reviewers left hanging for months. Thanks boss Amaekuma (talk) 02:25, 26 September 2019 (UTC)

September 2019

Hello, why you're reverting those award pages? What's the problem? ABTHEBOSS (talk) 13:03, 26 September 2019 (UTC)

They were merged as part of AfD discussions. The information can be added to the target page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 13:17, 26 September 2019 (UTC)

Be careful, man! ;-)

I just applied full protection to the An App a Day article, as this is clearly a content-related issue and dispute that needs to be resolved by discussion and consensus. You obviously want to be careful in situations like these, as you both were engaging in edit warring on the article. ;-) Just keep this in mind next time you run into a similar situation next time (as we all undoubtedly will... lol). I just don't want to see you get into any hot water over something like this, and I definitely don't want to see you get blocked by another admin who doesn't take time and talk to users and help resolve the matter at-hand. ;-) I'm just leaving you an informal message to let you know; no need to worry about it or lose and sleep over this. I hope you're having a great day, and it's good to see you again! :-) Cheers - ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 16:28, 27 September 2019 (UTC)

Never mind! Apparently this user is Fourlaxers, and is engaging in block evasion. Sorry for bothering you with the message I left above. :-) ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 16:33, 27 September 2019 (UTC)

No worries, Oshwah - thanks for looking out for me. My response was that I thought this was a sock, and had no way of checking, however. Regardless, thanks for your concern. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 21:44, 27 September 2019 (UTC)

No problem! Just lookin' out for you and watching your back. ;-) ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 23:46, 27 September 2019 (UTC)

As always, always a pleasure Oshwah - appreciate your oversight. And thanks for all you do on WP. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 00:39, 28 September 2019 (UTC)

Hi, good afternoon.

Good afternoon; I live in this state; this articles are diferents; one article is for municipality and other article is for settlement; municipality and settlement is not the same.Marrovi (talk) 16:22, 29 September 2019 (UTC)

Hi Marrovi - I have no idea what you are talking about. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 16:24, 29 September 2019 (UTC)

Category:Municipalities of the State of Mexico‎

Category:Municipality seats in the State of Mexico‎

Category:‎Populated places in the State of Mexico‎

There are three diferent categories by Mexico state political subdivitions; regards.Marrovi (talk) 16:26, 29 September 2019 (UTC)

For example; Tequixquiac is a municipality; Santiago Tequixquiac is a municipality seat or municipality capital and Tlapanaloya is a village or town inside in Tequixquiac municipality.Marrovi (talk) 16:29, 29 September 2019 (UTC)

Hi again. Sorry, but I still have no idea what you are talking about. It does not appear that I've edited any of those pages or categories.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 17:15, 29 September 2019 (UTC)

Deletion of my page

Hi. I wanted you let you know Devid Naryzhnyy ‘s article was decided to be kept by wikipedia managers. So from now on DO NOT put flag on other figure skaters who qualifed for Junior GrandPrix Final. Thank you. Yoniiieei (talk) 23:19, 30 September 2019 (UTC)

Hi Yoniiieei, I read the message that Onel5969 left you on your talk page and he was friendly and respectful. Your message to him here doesn't strike me as quite as respectful.

I also wanted to let you know that Wikipedia doesn't have managers - it's the community, people like you and like him and like me, who decide together what is kept and what is deleted.

And one more thing which I think you may find useful to know is that there is no such thing as your page - once you add anything to Wikipedia it's no longer yours, it belongs to the project.

I hope Onel5969 continues to do the great job he does in making sure articles created in Wikipedia are notable, even if sometimes it's necessary to err on the side of caution. But as you've seen, the system is not broken, as the article you created is still there.

Dr. Vogel (talk) 23:30, 30 September 2019 (UTC)

First, thank you DrVogel for your kind words. Second, Yoniiieei, in my opinion, "your" article was kept as a simply result of vote counting, which shouldn't happen during an AfD process, but unfortunately does happen from time to time. There is no basis in notability criteria for the article to have been kept. Another article, similar to the one you created, was deleted on the same set of facts, on the same day, created by one of the other folks who !voted at this AfD. Having said all that, NEVER post on my talk page again. Your comments are irrelevant and unwanted. You might want to read WP:CIVIL.Onel5969 ^{TT me} 01:42, 1 October 2019 (UTC)

Hi, Onel5969. I know you dont seem to like me here but I came because I feel responsibility on this. First I will apologize I was not kind, and hope you forgive. I was thinking about “Another article, similar to the one you created, was deleted on the same set of facts, on the same day, created by one of the other folks who !voted at this AfD.” you wrote and I have the conclusion that you’ve misunderstood something. The article which got deleted was skater who only participated in Junior Grandprix series. And the article which got to be kept was about skaters who qulified for Junior Grandprix “final”. which is very selective 6 teams among 70teams. here you can see.[4]. It was reasonable that many editors who know the sport agreed with me. Anyway since this little unhappy conflicts, I’ve made a suggestion to revise wp:NSKATE at Wikipedia talk:Notability (sports). And also apologize I’ve called “my” article last time I came here because i was just so knew here. didnt know what to call. Anyway thanks to you I’ve learned lots of rules here. thanks a lot again and wish you forgive me. Yoniiieei (talk) 15:33, 10 October 2019 (UTC)